The challenges the United States faces are familiar territory to the people at the IMF. If you hid the name of the country and just showed them the numbers, there is no doubt what old IMF hands would say: nationalize troubled banks and break them up as necessary.
Interesting read from the IMF perspective. I noticed it did not mention Geithner used to work for the IMF. I wonder if that was on purpose?
In a speech to a closed gathering at the Lowy Institute in Sydney on Thursday, Paul Keating gave a starkly different account of Geithner’s record in handling the Asian crisis: “Tim Geithner was the Treasury line officer who wrote the IMF [International Monetary Fund] program for Indonesia in 1997-98, which was to apply current account solutions to a capital account crisis.”
In other words, Geithner fundamentally misdiagnosed the problem. And his misdiagnosis led to a dreadfully wrong prescription.
Geithner thought Asia’s problem was the same as the ones that had shattered Latin America in the 1980s and Mexico in 1994, a classic current account crisis. In this kind of crisis, the central cause is that the government has run impossibly big debts.”
*Just an observation from a conspiracy theorist wacko…
[quote=arraya]*Just an observation from a conspiracy theorist wacko…[/quote]
Self-deprecating humor much appreciated by yours truly, a nonconspiracy theorist wacko.
The IMF has had its blunders over the years, but typically their advise has been appropriate. The US would do well in following it: nationalize insolvent banks, break them up, and any parts that survive can be re-privatized later.
Having the taxpayers pay inflated, fairy-tale prices for bad assets that the real experts don’t want is really bad policy.
[quote=arraya]*Just an observation from a conspiracy theorist wacko…[/quote]
Self-deprecating humor much appreciated by yours truly, a nonconspiracy theorist wacko.
The IMF has had its blunders over the years, but typically their advise has been appropriate. The US would do well in following it: nationalize insolvent banks, break them up, and any parts that survive can be re-privatized later.
Having the taxpayers pay inflated, fairy-tale prices for bad assets that the real experts don’t want is really bad policy.
[quote=arraya]*Just an observation from a conspiracy theorist wacko…[/quote]
Self-deprecating humor much appreciated by yours truly, a nonconspiracy theorist wacko.
The IMF has had its blunders over the years, but typically their advise has been appropriate. The US would do well in following it: nationalize insolvent banks, break them up, and any parts that survive can be re-privatized later.
Having the taxpayers pay inflated, fairy-tale prices for bad assets that the real experts don’t want is really bad policy.
[quote=arraya]*Just an observation from a conspiracy theorist wacko…[/quote]
Self-deprecating humor much appreciated by yours truly, a nonconspiracy theorist wacko.
The IMF has had its blunders over the years, but typically their advise has been appropriate. The US would do well in following it: nationalize insolvent banks, break them up, and any parts that survive can be re-privatized later.
Having the taxpayers pay inflated, fairy-tale prices for bad assets that the real experts don’t want is really bad policy.
[quote=arraya]*Just an observation from a conspiracy theorist wacko…[/quote]
Self-deprecating humor much appreciated by yours truly, a nonconspiracy theorist wacko.
The IMF has had its blunders over the years, but typically their advise has been appropriate. The US would do well in following it: nationalize insolvent banks, break them up, and any parts that survive can be re-privatized later.
Having the taxpayers pay inflated, fairy-tale prices for bad assets that the real experts don’t want is really bad policy.
.
