OT: Foxnews polls?

[Portlock]

I’m interested in witnessing the long, dour looks on the faces of Fox’s republican foot soldiers come election night!

Their sadness will just validate the subjectivity of their info-tainment-based, right wing, biased reporting.

[svelte]

[quote=nostradamus]It wouldn’t surprise me that they don’t want to post poll results when there is talk of a democratic landslide victory and red states are turning blue while voters are registering democratic in record numbers.[/quote]

It’s starting to look that way, but we still have just over three weeks left. Only four short weeks ago, things looked much different.

The interesting thing about looking at the RealClearPolitics site’s electoral maps for past elections (hit “Polls” then “Electoral Maps”) is that there were some real landslides in the Red direction (look at 1972!)…this is the first one in my adult life that has a chance of being a Blue one.

Very interesting times.

[svelte]

[quote=nostradamus]It wouldn’t surprise me that they don’t want to post poll results when there is talk of a democratic landslide victory and red states are turning blue while voters are registering democratic in record numbers.[/quote]

It’s starting to look that way, but we still have just over three weeks left. Only four short weeks ago, things looked much different.

The interesting thing about looking at the RealClearPolitics site’s electoral maps for past elections (hit “Polls” then “Electoral Maps”) is that there were some real landslides in the Red direction (look at 1972!)…this is the first one in my adult life that has a chance of being a Blue one.

Very interesting times.

[svelte]

[quote=nostradamus]It wouldn’t surprise me that they don’t want to post poll results when there is talk of a democratic landslide victory and red states are turning blue while voters are registering democratic in record numbers.[/quote]

It’s starting to look that way, but we still have just over three weeks left. Only four short weeks ago, things looked much different.

The interesting thing about looking at the RealClearPolitics site’s electoral maps for past elections (hit “Polls” then “Electoral Maps”) is that there were some real landslides in the Red direction (look at 1972!)…this is the first one in my adult life that has a chance of being a Blue one.

Very interesting times.

[svelte]

[quote=nostradamus]It wouldn’t surprise me that they don’t want to post poll results when there is talk of a democratic landslide victory and red states are turning blue while voters are registering democratic in record numbers.[/quote]

It’s starting to look that way, but we still have just over three weeks left. Only four short weeks ago, things looked much different.

The interesting thing about looking at the RealClearPolitics site’s electoral maps for past elections (hit “Polls” then “Electoral Maps”) is that there were some real landslides in the Red direction (look at 1972!)…this is the first one in my adult life that has a chance of being a Blue one.

Very interesting times.

[svelte]

[quote=nostradamus]It wouldn’t surprise me that they don’t want to post poll results when there is talk of a democratic landslide victory and red states are turning blue while voters are registering democratic in record numbers.[/quote]

It’s starting to look that way, but we still have just over three weeks left. Only four short weeks ago, things looked much different.

The interesting thing about looking at the RealClearPolitics site’s electoral maps for past elections (hit “Polls” then “Electoral Maps”) is that there were some real landslides in the Red direction (look at 1972!)…this is the first one in my adult life that has a chance of being a Blue one.

Very interesting times.

[kicksavedave]

Not surprisingly, after the least debate which most every independent poll had Obama winning by an average of about 15%, I switched over to FNC to see what they had to say about it. The only poll the showed was a viewer text message poll and it had McCain winning 85% to about 7% for Obama. It was laughable.

I guess when the news isn’t good, you simply don’t report it?

[kicksavedave]

Not surprisingly, after the least debate which most every independent poll had Obama winning by an average of about 15%, I switched over to FNC to see what they had to say about it. The only poll the showed was a viewer text message poll and it had McCain winning 85% to about 7% for Obama. It was laughable.

I guess when the news isn’t good, you simply don’t report it?

[kicksavedave]

Not surprisingly, after the least debate which most every independent poll had Obama winning by an average of about 15%, I switched over to FNC to see what they had to say about it. The only poll the showed was a viewer text message poll and it had McCain winning 85% to about 7% for Obama. It was laughable.

I guess when the news isn’t good, you simply don’t report it?

[kicksavedave]

Not surprisingly, after the least debate which most every independent poll had Obama winning by an average of about 15%, I switched over to FNC to see what they had to say about it. The only poll the showed was a viewer text message poll and it had McCain winning 85% to about 7% for Obama. It was laughable.

I guess when the news isn’t good, you simply don’t report it?

[kicksavedave]

Not surprisingly, after the least debate which most every independent poll had Obama winning by an average of about 15%, I switched over to FNC to see what they had to say about it. The only poll the showed was a viewer text message poll and it had McCain winning 85% to about 7% for Obama. It was laughable.

I guess when the news isn’t good, you simply don’t report it?

[Author]

Posts