- This topic has 229 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 13, 2011 at 12:48 AM #710666July 13, 2011 at 12:49 AM #709461
CA renter
Participant[quote=TemekuT]The yardstick moved because of the proliferation of high carb, cheap fast food, and portion size. Eating out often leads to obesity.
The obesity solution is threefold:
1. clean, pure food prepared at home
2. more fruit and vegetable carbs and less grain carbs.
3. portion control[/quote]
Totally agree with this.
July 13, 2011 at 12:49 AM #709557CA renter
Participant[quote=TemekuT]The yardstick moved because of the proliferation of high carb, cheap fast food, and portion size. Eating out often leads to obesity.
The obesity solution is threefold:
1. clean, pure food prepared at home
2. more fruit and vegetable carbs and less grain carbs.
3. portion control[/quote]
Totally agree with this.
July 13, 2011 at 12:49 AM #710156CA renter
Participant[quote=TemekuT]The yardstick moved because of the proliferation of high carb, cheap fast food, and portion size. Eating out often leads to obesity.
The obesity solution is threefold:
1. clean, pure food prepared at home
2. more fruit and vegetable carbs and less grain carbs.
3. portion control[/quote]
Totally agree with this.
July 13, 2011 at 12:49 AM #710310CA renter
Participant[quote=TemekuT]The yardstick moved because of the proliferation of high carb, cheap fast food, and portion size. Eating out often leads to obesity.
The obesity solution is threefold:
1. clean, pure food prepared at home
2. more fruit and vegetable carbs and less grain carbs.
3. portion control[/quote]
Totally agree with this.
July 13, 2011 at 12:49 AM #710671CA renter
Participant[quote=TemekuT]The yardstick moved because of the proliferation of high carb, cheap fast food, and portion size. Eating out often leads to obesity.
The obesity solution is threefold:
1. clean, pure food prepared at home
2. more fruit and vegetable carbs and less grain carbs.
3. portion control[/quote]
Totally agree with this.
July 13, 2011 at 3:58 AM #709466moneymaker
ParticipantOK just checked my BMI and @ 6’2″ weighing 203 I’m overweight. I don’t look overweight, I admit though that I do “feel” overweight. I would have to lose 9 pounds to weigh in @ 194 and not be overweight. That’s 36288 Calories that I need to burn. Ok I will get started on it tomorrow, oh yeah I forgot tomorrow never comes,so how about right now. Most people under estimate how long it takes to lose weight. Other than fasting, which I agree would do a lot of people good to try, it would probably take atleast 3 weeks to lose those 9 pounds, minimum.
July 13, 2011 at 3:58 AM #709562moneymaker
ParticipantOK just checked my BMI and @ 6’2″ weighing 203 I’m overweight. I don’t look overweight, I admit though that I do “feel” overweight. I would have to lose 9 pounds to weigh in @ 194 and not be overweight. That’s 36288 Calories that I need to burn. Ok I will get started on it tomorrow, oh yeah I forgot tomorrow never comes,so how about right now. Most people under estimate how long it takes to lose weight. Other than fasting, which I agree would do a lot of people good to try, it would probably take atleast 3 weeks to lose those 9 pounds, minimum.
July 13, 2011 at 3:58 AM #710161moneymaker
ParticipantOK just checked my BMI and @ 6’2″ weighing 203 I’m overweight. I don’t look overweight, I admit though that I do “feel” overweight. I would have to lose 9 pounds to weigh in @ 194 and not be overweight. That’s 36288 Calories that I need to burn. Ok I will get started on it tomorrow, oh yeah I forgot tomorrow never comes,so how about right now. Most people under estimate how long it takes to lose weight. Other than fasting, which I agree would do a lot of people good to try, it would probably take atleast 3 weeks to lose those 9 pounds, minimum.
July 13, 2011 at 3:58 AM #710315moneymaker
ParticipantOK just checked my BMI and @ 6’2″ weighing 203 I’m overweight. I don’t look overweight, I admit though that I do “feel” overweight. I would have to lose 9 pounds to weigh in @ 194 and not be overweight. That’s 36288 Calories that I need to burn. Ok I will get started on it tomorrow, oh yeah I forgot tomorrow never comes,so how about right now. Most people under estimate how long it takes to lose weight. Other than fasting, which I agree would do a lot of people good to try, it would probably take atleast 3 weeks to lose those 9 pounds, minimum.
July 13, 2011 at 3:58 AM #710676moneymaker
ParticipantOK just checked my BMI and @ 6’2″ weighing 203 I’m overweight. I don’t look overweight, I admit though that I do “feel” overweight. I would have to lose 9 pounds to weigh in @ 194 and not be overweight. That’s 36288 Calories that I need to burn. Ok I will get started on it tomorrow, oh yeah I forgot tomorrow never comes,so how about right now. Most people under estimate how long it takes to lose weight. Other than fasting, which I agree would do a lot of people good to try, it would probably take atleast 3 weeks to lose those 9 pounds, minimum.
July 13, 2011 at 9:24 AM #709479briansd1
Guest[quote=CA renter] Why can’t we change the world?
If we honestly believe that certain food additives or behaviors (of various sorts) are detrimental to our health and society, why should we not try to change them?[/quote]
If you read CD’s post you’d see that our backward primitive instincts are causing us, as humans, to be self-destructive.
Banning certain foods won’t help. In a world of abundance where everything is commoditized, we need to evolve psychologically to resist self-destruction.
That would take real leadership to tell people some painful truths. It won’t happen because people get all in a tizzy and offended if you even hint that they are fat. Michelle Obama being labeled as a food Nazi is a prime example.
But failing a change in thinking, banning/taxing harmful foods is a good start. Even that will be very hard. I think that CD would say that’s just kicking the can down the road.
July 13, 2011 at 9:24 AM #709574briansd1
Guest[quote=CA renter] Why can’t we change the world?
If we honestly believe that certain food additives or behaviors (of various sorts) are detrimental to our health and society, why should we not try to change them?[/quote]
If you read CD’s post you’d see that our backward primitive instincts are causing us, as humans, to be self-destructive.
Banning certain foods won’t help. In a world of abundance where everything is commoditized, we need to evolve psychologically to resist self-destruction.
That would take real leadership to tell people some painful truths. It won’t happen because people get all in a tizzy and offended if you even hint that they are fat. Michelle Obama being labeled as a food Nazi is a prime example.
But failing a change in thinking, banning/taxing harmful foods is a good start. Even that will be very hard. I think that CD would say that’s just kicking the can down the road.
July 13, 2011 at 9:24 AM #710175briansd1
Guest[quote=CA renter] Why can’t we change the world?
If we honestly believe that certain food additives or behaviors (of various sorts) are detrimental to our health and society, why should we not try to change them?[/quote]
If you read CD’s post you’d see that our backward primitive instincts are causing us, as humans, to be self-destructive.
Banning certain foods won’t help. In a world of abundance where everything is commoditized, we need to evolve psychologically to resist self-destruction.
That would take real leadership to tell people some painful truths. It won’t happen because people get all in a tizzy and offended if you even hint that they are fat. Michelle Obama being labeled as a food Nazi is a prime example.
But failing a change in thinking, banning/taxing harmful foods is a good start. Even that will be very hard. I think that CD would say that’s just kicking the can down the road.
July 13, 2011 at 9:24 AM #710328briansd1
Guest[quote=CA renter] Why can’t we change the world?
If we honestly believe that certain food additives or behaviors (of various sorts) are detrimental to our health and society, why should we not try to change them?[/quote]
If you read CD’s post you’d see that our backward primitive instincts are causing us, as humans, to be self-destructive.
Banning certain foods won’t help. In a world of abundance where everything is commoditized, we need to evolve psychologically to resist self-destruction.
That would take real leadership to tell people some painful truths. It won’t happen because people get all in a tizzy and offended if you even hint that they are fat. Michelle Obama being labeled as a food Nazi is a prime example.
But failing a change in thinking, banning/taxing harmful foods is a good start. Even that will be very hard. I think that CD would say that’s just kicking the can down the road.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
