- This topic has 212 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 11 months ago by zk.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 24, 2014 at 11:21 AM #779408October 24, 2014 at 11:26 AM #779410ZeitgeistParticipant
[img_assist|nid=19354|title=Government in charge of Ebola|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=65][quote=outtamojo][quote=FlyerInHi]Who exactly is “they”?
We have a decentralized, disparate, private health care system. But a few cases of ebola, and we want the government to swoop-in and instantly control the whole situation.
It seems me like an opportunity not to be wasted.[/quote]
Political nutjobs please stay away. This is, or should be, all about safe handling of ebola cases and not getting anyone killed due to inadequate processes.[/quote]
October 24, 2014 at 11:28 AM #779411NotCrankyParticipant[quote=outtamojo][quote=FlyerInHi]Who exactly is “they”?
We have a decentralized, disparate, private health care system. But a few cases of ebola, and we want the government to swoop-in and instantly control the whole situation.
It seems me like an opportunity not to be wasted.[/quote]
Political nutjobs please stay away. This is, or should be, all about safe handling of ebola cases and not getting anyone killed due to inadequate processes.[/quote]
Not much different than the Ferguson case , Brian, not at all.October 24, 2014 at 11:55 AM #779412FlyerInHiGuest[quote=Blogstar][quote=outtamojo][quote=FlyerInHi]Who exactly is “they”?
We have a decentralized, disparate, private health care system. But a few cases of ebola, and we want the government to swoop-in and instantly control the whole situation.
It seems me like an opportunity not to be wasted.[/quote]
Political nutjobs please stay away. This is, or should be, all about safe handling of ebola cases and not getting anyone killed due to inadequate processes.[/quote]
Not much different than the Ferguson case , Brian, not at all.[/quote]Yes, I can definitely see your point. Same but different. The devil’s in the details.
October 24, 2014 at 12:00 PM #779416NotCrankyParticipant[quote=FlyerInHi][quote=Blogstar][quote=outtamojo][quote=FlyerInHi]Who exactly is “they”?
We have a decentralized, disparate, private health care system. But a few cases of ebola, and we want the government to swoop-in and instantly control the whole situation.
It seems me like an opportunity not to be wasted.[/quote]
Political nutjobs please stay away. This is, or should be, all about safe handling of ebola cases and not getting anyone killed due to inadequate processes.[/quote]
Not much different than the Ferguson case , Brian, not at all.[/quote]Yes, I can definitely see your point. Same but different. The devil’s in the details.[/quote]
You know I was with you until you added that bit about devils and details. Both are serious matters though.October 24, 2014 at 12:31 PM #779418FlyerInHiGuestEbola is all about science. All the medical and scientific experts I’ve heard said that we’ve handled Ebola very well so far, with some mistake we’ve learned from.
October 24, 2014 at 12:35 PM #779420NotCrankyParticipant[quote=FlyerInHi]Ebola is all about science. All the medical and scientific experts I’ve heard said that we’ve handled Ebola very well so far, with some mistake we’ve learned from.[/quote]
O.k very unlike Ferguson then.October 24, 2014 at 2:16 PM #779426ltsdddParticipant[quote=outtamojo][quote=flu]Nina Pham is cured… That’s good news.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/24/health/ebola-nurse/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
Also Vinson seems to be almost there too…
Good news.[/quote]
Yes, very good news. Less frightening to know that 1rst world medical care can make this level of virus less of a death sentence.[/quote]
Is she really cured and ebola-free? Or is she now a carrier of the virus that still can be transmitted to others (a la HIV)?
October 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM #779432moneymakerParticipantYes I’m surprised somebody can be “cured” so quickly. Too bad that is not true with AIDS. I was surprised to see the president hug her, just a little curious about the before and after scenario.
October 24, 2014 at 5:00 PM #779434FlyerInHiGuestMaybe the hug is part of a conspiracy.
October 24, 2014 at 9:41 PM #779464AecetiaParticipant“The current Ebola virus’s hyper-evolution is unprecedented; there has been more human-to-human transmission in the past four months than most likely occurred in the last 500 to 1,000 years. Each new infection represents trillions of throws of the genetic dice.”
October 24, 2014 at 9:59 PM #779468zkParticipant[quote=Aecetia]”The current Ebola virus’s hyper-evolution is unprecedented; there has been more human-to-human transmission in the past four months than most likely occurred in the last 500 to 1,000 years. Each new infection represents trillions of throws of the genetic dice.”
A lame and disappointing article. Just another fear monger with incomplete and incorrect information. He’s afraid that ebola could go airborne. But no human virus has ever changed its mode of transmission:
And the Canadian researchers did not prove that ebola “could be transmitted by the respiratory route from pigs to monkeys.”
http://healthmap.org/site/diseasedaily/article/pigs-monkeys-ebola-goes-airborne-112112
Nevermind the sensational title of the above link. Read the article.
January 20, 2015 at 7:13 PM #782215zkParticipant[img_assist|nid=20532|title=Exactly|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=73]
January 20, 2015 at 7:45 PM #782218no_such_realityParticipantI’ll go on out on a limb and say that measles, once eradicated in the USA will kill more people in the States than ebola.
January 20, 2015 at 11:48 PM #782223CA renterParticipant[quote=zk][img_assist|nid=20532|title=Exactly|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=73][/quote]
That’s a pretty good one. 🙂
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.