- This topic has 95 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 17, 2009 at 11:37 AM #484504November 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM #483657
Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=CONCHO]Margaret Atwood wrote a good SF book about where we might end up as a result of all of this genetic engineering — Oryx and Crake. It’s not a happy story.[/quote]
CONCHO: Well, at least its more upbeat than her other dystopian work, “The Handmaid’s Tale”.
“Oryx” was a good book.
November 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM #483822Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=CONCHO]Margaret Atwood wrote a good SF book about where we might end up as a result of all of this genetic engineering — Oryx and Crake. It’s not a happy story.[/quote]
CONCHO: Well, at least its more upbeat than her other dystopian work, “The Handmaid’s Tale”.
“Oryx” was a good book.
November 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM #484199Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=CONCHO]Margaret Atwood wrote a good SF book about where we might end up as a result of all of this genetic engineering — Oryx and Crake. It’s not a happy story.[/quote]
CONCHO: Well, at least its more upbeat than her other dystopian work, “The Handmaid’s Tale”.
“Oryx” was a good book.
November 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM #484282Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=CONCHO]Margaret Atwood wrote a good SF book about where we might end up as a result of all of this genetic engineering — Oryx and Crake. It’s not a happy story.[/quote]
CONCHO: Well, at least its more upbeat than her other dystopian work, “The Handmaid’s Tale”.
“Oryx” was a good book.
November 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM #484509Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=CONCHO]Margaret Atwood wrote a good SF book about where we might end up as a result of all of this genetic engineering — Oryx and Crake. It’s not a happy story.[/quote]
CONCHO: Well, at least its more upbeat than her other dystopian work, “The Handmaid’s Tale”.
“Oryx” was a good book.
November 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM #483682jpinpb
ParticipantMeanwhile, US suffers food insecurities. Hmmm. Aren’t we in a recovery?
November 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM #483847jpinpb
ParticipantMeanwhile, US suffers food insecurities. Hmmm. Aren’t we in a recovery?
November 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM #484223jpinpb
ParticipantMeanwhile, US suffers food insecurities. Hmmm. Aren’t we in a recovery?
November 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM #484307jpinpb
ParticipantMeanwhile, US suffers food insecurities. Hmmm. Aren’t we in a recovery?
November 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM #484534jpinpb
ParticipantMeanwhile, US suffers food insecurities. Hmmm. Aren’t we in a recovery?
November 17, 2009 at 1:12 PM #483697UCGal
ParticipantSpeaking of Monsanto – just look at rGBH – the bovine growth hormone given to cows to increase milk production.
It’s been banned in Europe and Canada. From my reading, Monsanto was involved in limiting the scope of the FDA safety trials to ONLY look to see if the milk had elevated levels of growth hormone. (It doesn’t) They didn’t look to see of cows given rGBH had other endocrine changes. Turns out they have much higher levels of adreniline, etc…
Monsanto had marketed this to dairy farmers for over 10 years before people learned of it. And their answer, when people heard about it and protested – Hey, it’s been going on for more than 10 years, so what’s the big deal.
I figure my kids don’t need to get excess hormones from their milk. So I buy my milk at Henries. (drug free cows.)
November 17, 2009 at 1:12 PM #483862UCGal
ParticipantSpeaking of Monsanto – just look at rGBH – the bovine growth hormone given to cows to increase milk production.
It’s been banned in Europe and Canada. From my reading, Monsanto was involved in limiting the scope of the FDA safety trials to ONLY look to see if the milk had elevated levels of growth hormone. (It doesn’t) They didn’t look to see of cows given rGBH had other endocrine changes. Turns out they have much higher levels of adreniline, etc…
Monsanto had marketed this to dairy farmers for over 10 years before people learned of it. And their answer, when people heard about it and protested – Hey, it’s been going on for more than 10 years, so what’s the big deal.
I figure my kids don’t need to get excess hormones from their milk. So I buy my milk at Henries. (drug free cows.)
November 17, 2009 at 1:12 PM #484238UCGal
ParticipantSpeaking of Monsanto – just look at rGBH – the bovine growth hormone given to cows to increase milk production.
It’s been banned in Europe and Canada. From my reading, Monsanto was involved in limiting the scope of the FDA safety trials to ONLY look to see if the milk had elevated levels of growth hormone. (It doesn’t) They didn’t look to see of cows given rGBH had other endocrine changes. Turns out they have much higher levels of adreniline, etc…
Monsanto had marketed this to dairy farmers for over 10 years before people learned of it. And their answer, when people heard about it and protested – Hey, it’s been going on for more than 10 years, so what’s the big deal.
I figure my kids don’t need to get excess hormones from their milk. So I buy my milk at Henries. (drug free cows.)
November 17, 2009 at 1:12 PM #484322UCGal
ParticipantSpeaking of Monsanto – just look at rGBH – the bovine growth hormone given to cows to increase milk production.
It’s been banned in Europe and Canada. From my reading, Monsanto was involved in limiting the scope of the FDA safety trials to ONLY look to see if the milk had elevated levels of growth hormone. (It doesn’t) They didn’t look to see of cows given rGBH had other endocrine changes. Turns out they have much higher levels of adreniline, etc…
Monsanto had marketed this to dairy farmers for over 10 years before people learned of it. And their answer, when people heard about it and protested – Hey, it’s been going on for more than 10 years, so what’s the big deal.
I figure my kids don’t need to get excess hormones from their milk. So I buy my milk at Henries. (drug free cows.)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
