- This topic has 205 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 9, 2010 at 10:41 AM #603710September 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM #602689AnonymousGuest
You can do a search on recent US patent applications (= latest technology) here:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html
And issued US patents here:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html
It’s fairly easy to use. Try some key words in the “abstract” field.I have several patents and pending applications, but they were done through my work, using a patent attorney. It’s not cheap, $10k+…. If you just want to get started, then you can file a provisional patent application. It doesn’t have all the formal requirements of a real application, but will last a year (after which you’ll have to abandon it or file a real application). You can write a provisional patent application yourself. The patent office has a how-to write-up. Within a year you should know if your idea has any commercial value. Make sure you do the search for prior art before spending too much time on an application.
September 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM #602778AnonymousGuestYou can do a search on recent US patent applications (= latest technology) here:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html
And issued US patents here:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html
It’s fairly easy to use. Try some key words in the “abstract” field.I have several patents and pending applications, but they were done through my work, using a patent attorney. It’s not cheap, $10k+…. If you just want to get started, then you can file a provisional patent application. It doesn’t have all the formal requirements of a real application, but will last a year (after which you’ll have to abandon it or file a real application). You can write a provisional patent application yourself. The patent office has a how-to write-up. Within a year you should know if your idea has any commercial value. Make sure you do the search for prior art before spending too much time on an application.
September 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM #603326AnonymousGuestYou can do a search on recent US patent applications (= latest technology) here:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html
And issued US patents here:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html
It’s fairly easy to use. Try some key words in the “abstract” field.I have several patents and pending applications, but they were done through my work, using a patent attorney. It’s not cheap, $10k+…. If you just want to get started, then you can file a provisional patent application. It doesn’t have all the formal requirements of a real application, but will last a year (after which you’ll have to abandon it or file a real application). You can write a provisional patent application yourself. The patent office has a how-to write-up. Within a year you should know if your idea has any commercial value. Make sure you do the search for prior art before spending too much time on an application.
September 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM #603433AnonymousGuestYou can do a search on recent US patent applications (= latest technology) here:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html
And issued US patents here:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html
It’s fairly easy to use. Try some key words in the “abstract” field.I have several patents and pending applications, but they were done through my work, using a patent attorney. It’s not cheap, $10k+…. If you just want to get started, then you can file a provisional patent application. It doesn’t have all the formal requirements of a real application, but will last a year (after which you’ll have to abandon it or file a real application). You can write a provisional patent application yourself. The patent office has a how-to write-up. Within a year you should know if your idea has any commercial value. Make sure you do the search for prior art before spending too much time on an application.
September 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM #603750AnonymousGuestYou can do a search on recent US patent applications (= latest technology) here:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html
And issued US patents here:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html
It’s fairly easy to use. Try some key words in the “abstract” field.I have several patents and pending applications, but they were done through my work, using a patent attorney. It’s not cheap, $10k+…. If you just want to get started, then you can file a provisional patent application. It doesn’t have all the formal requirements of a real application, but will last a year (after which you’ll have to abandon it or file a real application). You can write a provisional patent application yourself. The patent office has a how-to write-up. Within a year you should know if your idea has any commercial value. Make sure you do the search for prior art before spending too much time on an application.
September 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM #602699njtosdParticipantI am a registered patent attorney – although I am not currently working (well, I’m a stay at home mom – people differ on whether that counts as work). Not meaning to give legal advice here, but here are a few things to consider:
As I’m sure you know, the patent process is long and involved, but the very first thing to remember is not to disclose your invention before getting your application on file. Although the U.S. allows you to file your application up to one year after a public disclosure (and the word “public” has a very specific definition) almost all other countries forbid filing on inventions that have been publicly disclosed (and they have a slightly different standard for what is a public disclosure).
And don’t let someone convince you that you can file something thrown together as a “provisional” application that can be cleaned up later in a non-provisional application. If you file a provisional, it should be of the same quality as a standard filing – although you need not include claims until you file the non-provisional.
You might want to get in touch with UCSD Connect (http://www.connect.org/). My husband (also a patent attorney) used to volunteer with Connect and it seems to be a really good organization. I know that they provide free business assistance to companies who want to capitalize on their IP, but I don’t know if they have people who can help with preparing and filing applications.
If you want to pm me I can give you some more info. And I agree that if at all possible, you’re better off manufacturing in the U.S.If you’re interested in the patent system as a whole, you might also want to take a look at this article that I mentioned in another thread:
Inventing our Way Out of Joblessness (by Judge Paul Michel, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and Henry Northhaft)
The authors argue that returning $750 million (plus an additional $250,000) to the U.S. Patent Office would produce “over the next three years, at least 675,000 and as many as 2.25 million jobs. Assuming a mid-range figure of 1.5 million, the price would be roughly $660 per job — and that would be 525 times more cost effective than the 2.5 million jobs created by the government’s $787 billion stimulus plan.”
The article pointed to the Berkeley Patent Study, which supported the contention that each issued patent is associated with 3 to 10 new jobs.
Congrats for having the gumption to try to create something new. If everyone keeps trying to invest in someone else’s technology, we will eventually end up with a lot of investors and no technology to invest in.
September 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM #602788njtosdParticipantI am a registered patent attorney – although I am not currently working (well, I’m a stay at home mom – people differ on whether that counts as work). Not meaning to give legal advice here, but here are a few things to consider:
As I’m sure you know, the patent process is long and involved, but the very first thing to remember is not to disclose your invention before getting your application on file. Although the U.S. allows you to file your application up to one year after a public disclosure (and the word “public” has a very specific definition) almost all other countries forbid filing on inventions that have been publicly disclosed (and they have a slightly different standard for what is a public disclosure).
And don’t let someone convince you that you can file something thrown together as a “provisional” application that can be cleaned up later in a non-provisional application. If you file a provisional, it should be of the same quality as a standard filing – although you need not include claims until you file the non-provisional.
You might want to get in touch with UCSD Connect (http://www.connect.org/). My husband (also a patent attorney) used to volunteer with Connect and it seems to be a really good organization. I know that they provide free business assistance to companies who want to capitalize on their IP, but I don’t know if they have people who can help with preparing and filing applications.
If you want to pm me I can give you some more info. And I agree that if at all possible, you’re better off manufacturing in the U.S.If you’re interested in the patent system as a whole, you might also want to take a look at this article that I mentioned in another thread:
Inventing our Way Out of Joblessness (by Judge Paul Michel, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and Henry Northhaft)
The authors argue that returning $750 million (plus an additional $250,000) to the U.S. Patent Office would produce “over the next three years, at least 675,000 and as many as 2.25 million jobs. Assuming a mid-range figure of 1.5 million, the price would be roughly $660 per job — and that would be 525 times more cost effective than the 2.5 million jobs created by the government’s $787 billion stimulus plan.”
The article pointed to the Berkeley Patent Study, which supported the contention that each issued patent is associated with 3 to 10 new jobs.
Congrats for having the gumption to try to create something new. If everyone keeps trying to invest in someone else’s technology, we will eventually end up with a lot of investors and no technology to invest in.
September 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM #603336njtosdParticipantI am a registered patent attorney – although I am not currently working (well, I’m a stay at home mom – people differ on whether that counts as work). Not meaning to give legal advice here, but here are a few things to consider:
As I’m sure you know, the patent process is long and involved, but the very first thing to remember is not to disclose your invention before getting your application on file. Although the U.S. allows you to file your application up to one year after a public disclosure (and the word “public” has a very specific definition) almost all other countries forbid filing on inventions that have been publicly disclosed (and they have a slightly different standard for what is a public disclosure).
And don’t let someone convince you that you can file something thrown together as a “provisional” application that can be cleaned up later in a non-provisional application. If you file a provisional, it should be of the same quality as a standard filing – although you need not include claims until you file the non-provisional.
You might want to get in touch with UCSD Connect (http://www.connect.org/). My husband (also a patent attorney) used to volunteer with Connect and it seems to be a really good organization. I know that they provide free business assistance to companies who want to capitalize on their IP, but I don’t know if they have people who can help with preparing and filing applications.
If you want to pm me I can give you some more info. And I agree that if at all possible, you’re better off manufacturing in the U.S.If you’re interested in the patent system as a whole, you might also want to take a look at this article that I mentioned in another thread:
Inventing our Way Out of Joblessness (by Judge Paul Michel, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and Henry Northhaft)
The authors argue that returning $750 million (plus an additional $250,000) to the U.S. Patent Office would produce “over the next three years, at least 675,000 and as many as 2.25 million jobs. Assuming a mid-range figure of 1.5 million, the price would be roughly $660 per job — and that would be 525 times more cost effective than the 2.5 million jobs created by the government’s $787 billion stimulus plan.”
The article pointed to the Berkeley Patent Study, which supported the contention that each issued patent is associated with 3 to 10 new jobs.
Congrats for having the gumption to try to create something new. If everyone keeps trying to invest in someone else’s technology, we will eventually end up with a lot of investors and no technology to invest in.
September 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM #603443njtosdParticipantI am a registered patent attorney – although I am not currently working (well, I’m a stay at home mom – people differ on whether that counts as work). Not meaning to give legal advice here, but here are a few things to consider:
As I’m sure you know, the patent process is long and involved, but the very first thing to remember is not to disclose your invention before getting your application on file. Although the U.S. allows you to file your application up to one year after a public disclosure (and the word “public” has a very specific definition) almost all other countries forbid filing on inventions that have been publicly disclosed (and they have a slightly different standard for what is a public disclosure).
And don’t let someone convince you that you can file something thrown together as a “provisional” application that can be cleaned up later in a non-provisional application. If you file a provisional, it should be of the same quality as a standard filing – although you need not include claims until you file the non-provisional.
You might want to get in touch with UCSD Connect (http://www.connect.org/). My husband (also a patent attorney) used to volunteer with Connect and it seems to be a really good organization. I know that they provide free business assistance to companies who want to capitalize on their IP, but I don’t know if they have people who can help with preparing and filing applications.
If you want to pm me I can give you some more info. And I agree that if at all possible, you’re better off manufacturing in the U.S.If you’re interested in the patent system as a whole, you might also want to take a look at this article that I mentioned in another thread:
Inventing our Way Out of Joblessness (by Judge Paul Michel, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and Henry Northhaft)
The authors argue that returning $750 million (plus an additional $250,000) to the U.S. Patent Office would produce “over the next three years, at least 675,000 and as many as 2.25 million jobs. Assuming a mid-range figure of 1.5 million, the price would be roughly $660 per job — and that would be 525 times more cost effective than the 2.5 million jobs created by the government’s $787 billion stimulus plan.”
The article pointed to the Berkeley Patent Study, which supported the contention that each issued patent is associated with 3 to 10 new jobs.
Congrats for having the gumption to try to create something new. If everyone keeps trying to invest in someone else’s technology, we will eventually end up with a lot of investors and no technology to invest in.
September 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM #603760njtosdParticipantI am a registered patent attorney – although I am not currently working (well, I’m a stay at home mom – people differ on whether that counts as work). Not meaning to give legal advice here, but here are a few things to consider:
As I’m sure you know, the patent process is long and involved, but the very first thing to remember is not to disclose your invention before getting your application on file. Although the U.S. allows you to file your application up to one year after a public disclosure (and the word “public” has a very specific definition) almost all other countries forbid filing on inventions that have been publicly disclosed (and they have a slightly different standard for what is a public disclosure).
And don’t let someone convince you that you can file something thrown together as a “provisional” application that can be cleaned up later in a non-provisional application. If you file a provisional, it should be of the same quality as a standard filing – although you need not include claims until you file the non-provisional.
You might want to get in touch with UCSD Connect (http://www.connect.org/). My husband (also a patent attorney) used to volunteer with Connect and it seems to be a really good organization. I know that they provide free business assistance to companies who want to capitalize on their IP, but I don’t know if they have people who can help with preparing and filing applications.
If you want to pm me I can give you some more info. And I agree that if at all possible, you’re better off manufacturing in the U.S.If you’re interested in the patent system as a whole, you might also want to take a look at this article that I mentioned in another thread:
Inventing our Way Out of Joblessness (by Judge Paul Michel, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and Henry Northhaft)
The authors argue that returning $750 million (plus an additional $250,000) to the U.S. Patent Office would produce “over the next three years, at least 675,000 and as many as 2.25 million jobs. Assuming a mid-range figure of 1.5 million, the price would be roughly $660 per job — and that would be 525 times more cost effective than the 2.5 million jobs created by the government’s $787 billion stimulus plan.”
The article pointed to the Berkeley Patent Study, which supported the contention that each issued patent is associated with 3 to 10 new jobs.
Congrats for having the gumption to try to create something new. If everyone keeps trying to invest in someone else’s technology, we will eventually end up with a lot of investors and no technology to invest in.
September 9, 2010 at 12:21 PM #602709jpinpbParticipantGreat info, everyone. Thanks.
September 9, 2010 at 12:21 PM #602798jpinpbParticipantGreat info, everyone. Thanks.
September 9, 2010 at 12:21 PM #603346jpinpbParticipantGreat info, everyone. Thanks.
September 9, 2010 at 12:21 PM #603453jpinpbParticipantGreat info, everyone. Thanks.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.