- This topic has 50 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by
Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2009 at 8:42 PM #356851February 27, 2009 at 9:19 PM #357356
urbanrealtor
ParticipantI don’t say this just to be contrary but isn’t just keeping your jobs a free market incentive?
I don’t agree with the position they put you in but thats also why I support heavier regulation.
Weird to be the self-employed realtor supporting gov’t regulation on a real estate blog that favors free marketeers populated by engineers and coders.
February 27, 2009 at 9:19 PM #357467ParticipantI don’t say this just to be contrary but isn’t just keeping your jobs a free market incentive?
I don’t agree with the position they put you in but thats also why I support heavier regulation.
Weird to be the self-employed realtor supporting gov’t regulation on a real estate blog that favors free marketeers populated by engineers and coders.
February 27, 2009 at 9:19 PM #357328ParticipantI don’t say this just to be contrary but isn’t just keeping your jobs a free market incentive?
I don’t agree with the position they put you in but thats also why I support heavier regulation.
Weird to be the self-employed realtor supporting gov’t regulation on a real estate blog that favors free marketeers populated by engineers and coders.
February 27, 2009 at 9:19 PM #357190ParticipantI don’t say this just to be contrary but isn’t just keeping your jobs a free market incentive?
I don’t agree with the position they put you in but thats also why I support heavier regulation.
Weird to be the self-employed realtor supporting gov’t regulation on a real estate blog that favors free marketeers populated by engineers and coders.
February 27, 2009 at 9:19 PM #356887ParticipantI don’t say this just to be contrary but isn’t just keeping your jobs a free market incentive?
I don’t agree with the position they put you in but thats also why I support heavier regulation.
Weird to be the self-employed realtor supporting gov’t regulation on a real estate blog that favors free marketeers populated by engineers and coders.
February 27, 2009 at 9:25 PM #357204scaredyclassic
Participanti dont know what the rule is but it sure sounds like a potential case. i mean, breeders get to work less on easier terms just cause they bred? discriminates potentially against homsexuals, the barren, those who choose not to overpopulate the planet, etc. why should a baby be a get-out-of work-free card? screw the breeders! hey wait a minute. …im a breeder. cut me a break…
February 27, 2009 at 9:25 PM #357482Participanti dont know what the rule is but it sure sounds like a potential case. i mean, breeders get to work less on easier terms just cause they bred? discriminates potentially against homsexuals, the barren, those who choose not to overpopulate the planet, etc. why should a baby be a get-out-of work-free card? screw the breeders! hey wait a minute. …im a breeder. cut me a break…
February 27, 2009 at 9:25 PM #356902Participanti dont know what the rule is but it sure sounds like a potential case. i mean, breeders get to work less on easier terms just cause they bred? discriminates potentially against homsexuals, the barren, those who choose not to overpopulate the planet, etc. why should a baby be a get-out-of work-free card? screw the breeders! hey wait a minute. …im a breeder. cut me a break…
February 27, 2009 at 9:25 PM #357343Participanti dont know what the rule is but it sure sounds like a potential case. i mean, breeders get to work less on easier terms just cause they bred? discriminates potentially against homsexuals, the barren, those who choose not to overpopulate the planet, etc. why should a baby be a get-out-of work-free card? screw the breeders! hey wait a minute. …im a breeder. cut me a break…
February 27, 2009 at 9:25 PM #357371Participanti dont know what the rule is but it sure sounds like a potential case. i mean, breeders get to work less on easier terms just cause they bred? discriminates potentially against homsexuals, the barren, those who choose not to overpopulate the planet, etc. why should a baby be a get-out-of work-free card? screw the breeders! hey wait a minute. …im a breeder. cut me a break…
February 27, 2009 at 9:35 PM #357493jpinpb
ParticipantThis is unfair, but KIM that unemployment is climbing and if they ever had to let someone go, they’ll want to keep you on if you’re going out of your way to do things above and beyond. You’ve made yourself indispensible, in a way.
Of course, if they let you go, I know a good discrimination attorney.
February 27, 2009 at 9:35 PM #357353ParticipantThis is unfair, but KIM that unemployment is climbing and if they ever had to let someone go, they’ll want to keep you on if you’re going out of your way to do things above and beyond. You’ve made yourself indispensible, in a way.
Of course, if they let you go, I know a good discrimination attorney.
February 27, 2009 at 9:35 PM #356912ParticipantThis is unfair, but KIM that unemployment is climbing and if they ever had to let someone go, they’ll want to keep you on if you’re going out of your way to do things above and beyond. You’ve made yourself indispensible, in a way.
Of course, if they let you go, I know a good discrimination attorney.
February 27, 2009 at 9:35 PM #357214ParticipantThis is unfair, but KIM that unemployment is climbing and if they ever had to let someone go, they’ll want to keep you on if you’re going out of your way to do things above and beyond. You’ve made yourself indispensible, in a way.
Of course, if they let you go, I know a good discrimination attorney.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.