OT: A missile is launched by ???

[permabear]

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]The Office of Defense Secretary Robert Gates issued a statement today saying that the mystery contrail seen in the skies off Los Angeles County late Monday came from an aircraft, not a missile, as many have speculated … Cover up ???? 🙂 :)[/quote]

[Lieutenant Johnson] Hey, what does this button do?

[Eugene]

[quote=patb]
I’d like to see some details
such as

1) FAA Surveillance radar shows no unexpected returns

2) Radar at Pt Mugu and Vandenberg shows no returns.

3) DSP satellite XX shows no unexpected signatures.

4) SOSUS and Acoustic sensors show no unexpected signatures.[/quote]

the question is how you’re going to determine what’s expected and what’s unexpected. At any given moment, there are probably 10 planes within a 50 mile radius from the spot where the alleged missile was launched.

[quote]We don’t have those, but we do have the USA Notice to Mariners Nov. 6 2010.[/quote]

This probably refers to cruise missile testing. The object in the video, if it’s not an airplane contrail, has to be a SLBM. To my knowledge, the DoD isn’t working on new SLBMs, they had no reason to for the last 20 years, and, in any event, no sane person is going to authorise a SLBM test within a 100 mile range of the busiest airport on the West Coast, without coordinating with FAA and making damn sure that every pilot in the area knows about the test.

[Eugene]

[quote=patb]
I’d like to see some details
such as

1) FAA Surveillance radar shows no unexpected returns

2) Radar at Pt Mugu and Vandenberg shows no returns.

3) DSP satellite XX shows no unexpected signatures.

4) SOSUS and Acoustic sensors show no unexpected signatures.[/quote]

the question is how you’re going to determine what’s expected and what’s unexpected. At any given moment, there are probably 10 planes within a 50 mile radius from the spot where the alleged missile was launched.

[quote]We don’t have those, but we do have the USA Notice to Mariners Nov. 6 2010.[/quote]

This probably refers to cruise missile testing. The object in the video, if it’s not an airplane contrail, has to be a SLBM. To my knowledge, the DoD isn’t working on new SLBMs, they had no reason to for the last 20 years, and, in any event, no sane person is going to authorise a SLBM test within a 100 mile range of the busiest airport on the West Coast, without coordinating with FAA and making damn sure that every pilot in the area knows about the test.

[Eugene]

[quote=patb]
I’d like to see some details
such as

1) FAA Surveillance radar shows no unexpected returns

2) Radar at Pt Mugu and Vandenberg shows no returns.

3) DSP satellite XX shows no unexpected signatures.

4) SOSUS and Acoustic sensors show no unexpected signatures.[/quote]

the question is how you’re going to determine what’s expected and what’s unexpected. At any given moment, there are probably 10 planes within a 50 mile radius from the spot where the alleged missile was launched.

[quote]We don’t have those, but we do have the USA Notice to Mariners Nov. 6 2010.[/quote]

This probably refers to cruise missile testing. The object in the video, if it’s not an airplane contrail, has to be a SLBM. To my knowledge, the DoD isn’t working on new SLBMs, they had no reason to for the last 20 years, and, in any event, no sane person is going to authorise a SLBM test within a 100 mile range of the busiest airport on the West Coast, without coordinating with FAA and making damn sure that every pilot in the area knows about the test.

[Eugene]

[quote=patb]
I’d like to see some details
such as

1) FAA Surveillance radar shows no unexpected returns

2) Radar at Pt Mugu and Vandenberg shows no returns.

3) DSP satellite XX shows no unexpected signatures.

4) SOSUS and Acoustic sensors show no unexpected signatures.[/quote]

the question is how you’re going to determine what’s expected and what’s unexpected. At any given moment, there are probably 10 planes within a 50 mile radius from the spot where the alleged missile was launched.

[quote]We don’t have those, but we do have the USA Notice to Mariners Nov. 6 2010.[/quote]

This probably refers to cruise missile testing. The object in the video, if it’s not an airplane contrail, has to be a SLBM. To my knowledge, the DoD isn’t working on new SLBMs, they had no reason to for the last 20 years, and, in any event, no sane person is going to authorise a SLBM test within a 100 mile range of the busiest airport on the West Coast, without coordinating with FAA and making damn sure that every pilot in the area knows about the test.

[Eugene]

[quote=patb]
I’d like to see some details
such as

1) FAA Surveillance radar shows no unexpected returns

2) Radar at Pt Mugu and Vandenberg shows no returns.

3) DSP satellite XX shows no unexpected signatures.

4) SOSUS and Acoustic sensors show no unexpected signatures.[/quote]

the question is how you’re going to determine what’s expected and what’s unexpected. At any given moment, there are probably 10 planes within a 50 mile radius from the spot where the alleged missile was launched.

[quote]We don’t have those, but we do have the USA Notice to Mariners Nov. 6 2010.[/quote]

This probably refers to cruise missile testing. The object in the video, if it’s not an airplane contrail, has to be a SLBM. To my knowledge, the DoD isn’t working on new SLBMs, they had no reason to for the last 20 years, and, in any event, no sane person is going to authorise a SLBM test within a 100 mile range of the busiest airport on the West Coast, without coordinating with FAA and making damn sure that every pilot in the area knows about the test.

[Author]

Posts