- This topic has 65 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 12 months ago by
Nor-LA-SD-guy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 29, 2008 at 9:17 AM #12279
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:42 AM #178084
CostaMesa
ParticipantI’d caution that 300mpg is only possible when transporting a less-than human sized load of material – using any of the known methods of propulsion. The thermodynamic calculations are pretty straightforward.
OK – just read the article. What you don’t pay in gas will be paid in electricity bills.
Eeek. I just outed myself as a total geek. 😀
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:54 AM #178088
NotCranky
Participant“Eeek. I just outed myself as a total geek. :D”
Either that or you inherited the family joules.
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:54 AM #178444
NotCranky
Participant“Eeek. I just outed myself as a total geek. :D”
Either that or you inherited the family joules.
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:54 AM #178455
NotCranky
Participant“Eeek. I just outed myself as a total geek. :D”
Either that or you inherited the family joules.
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:54 AM #178456
NotCranky
Participant“Eeek. I just outed myself as a total geek. :D”
Either that or you inherited the family joules.
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:54 AM #178540
NotCranky
Participant“Eeek. I just outed myself as a total geek. :D”
Either that or you inherited the family joules.
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:55 AM #178094
kewp
ParticipantIt’s not really getting 300mpg, as its using the batteries as well. I gets something like 130mpg once the batteries are depleted.
I prefer the VentureOne.
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:24 AM #178113
temeculaguy
ParticipantI’m still backing Tesla. http://www.teslamotors.com/
They went into full production two weeks ago, looks like they figured out the transmission problem and are now boasting 0-60 in 3.9 seconds with a 135mpg equivalent at .02 cost per mile. The big difference is that other than the rest of the green cars, women will want to ride in your Tesla, nobody can steal it because they wont be able to power it up and old people wont yell at you for driving too slow. They will hit the streets in a few months. Their marketing strategy is brilliant, rather than market to eggheads or environmentalists, their first design is the fastest and sexiest thing on the road, every celeb has already bought one. Next they will come out with their planned 4 dr that is closer to 50k, then it’s on like Donkey Kong. -
March 29, 2008 at 11:42 AM #178117
kewp
ParticipantI admit I like Tesla’s marketing.
My concern is that since the power plant is basically a bunch of laptop batteries, they are going to wear out after only a couple years. Thats the downside of lithium-ion batteries.
I also still wonder if in the long run these are better for the environment, as much of our electricity still comes from fossil fuel.
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:42 AM #178474
kewp
ParticipantI admit I like Tesla’s marketing.
My concern is that since the power plant is basically a bunch of laptop batteries, they are going to wear out after only a couple years. Thats the downside of lithium-ion batteries.
I also still wonder if in the long run these are better for the environment, as much of our electricity still comes from fossil fuel.
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:42 AM #178485
kewp
ParticipantI admit I like Tesla’s marketing.
My concern is that since the power plant is basically a bunch of laptop batteries, they are going to wear out after only a couple years. Thats the downside of lithium-ion batteries.
I also still wonder if in the long run these are better for the environment, as much of our electricity still comes from fossil fuel.
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:42 AM #178487
kewp
ParticipantI admit I like Tesla’s marketing.
My concern is that since the power plant is basically a bunch of laptop batteries, they are going to wear out after only a couple years. Thats the downside of lithium-ion batteries.
I also still wonder if in the long run these are better for the environment, as much of our electricity still comes from fossil fuel.
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:42 AM #178573
kewp
ParticipantI admit I like Tesla’s marketing.
My concern is that since the power plant is basically a bunch of laptop batteries, they are going to wear out after only a couple years. Thats the downside of lithium-ion batteries.
I also still wonder if in the long run these are better for the environment, as much of our electricity still comes from fossil fuel.
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:45 AM #178127
Eugene
ParticipantI’m holding out for Chevy Volt
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:45 AM #178484
Eugene
ParticipantI’m holding out for Chevy Volt
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:45 AM #178495
Eugene
ParticipantI’m holding out for Chevy Volt
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:45 AM #178497
Eugene
ParticipantI’m holding out for Chevy Volt
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:45 AM #178583
Eugene
ParticipantI’m holding out for Chevy Volt
-
March 30, 2008 at 9:15 PM #178612
sd-maybe
ParticipantThe big difference is that other than the rest of the green cars, women will want to ride in your Tesla, nobody can steal it because they wont be able to power it up and old people wont yell at you for driving too slow
TG what are you talking about, that tripod from the Jetsons I posted has chick magnet written all over it. 😉
-
March 30, 2008 at 9:15 PM #178973
sd-maybe
ParticipantThe big difference is that other than the rest of the green cars, women will want to ride in your Tesla, nobody can steal it because they wont be able to power it up and old people wont yell at you for driving too slow
TG what are you talking about, that tripod from the Jetsons I posted has chick magnet written all over it. 😉
-
March 30, 2008 at 9:15 PM #178981
sd-maybe
ParticipantThe big difference is that other than the rest of the green cars, women will want to ride in your Tesla, nobody can steal it because they wont be able to power it up and old people wont yell at you for driving too slow
TG what are you talking about, that tripod from the Jetsons I posted has chick magnet written all over it. 😉
-
March 30, 2008 at 9:15 PM #178988
sd-maybe
ParticipantThe big difference is that other than the rest of the green cars, women will want to ride in your Tesla, nobody can steal it because they wont be able to power it up and old people wont yell at you for driving too slow
TG what are you talking about, that tripod from the Jetsons I posted has chick magnet written all over it. 😉
-
March 30, 2008 at 9:15 PM #179067
sd-maybe
ParticipantThe big difference is that other than the rest of the green cars, women will want to ride in your Tesla, nobody can steal it because they wont be able to power it up and old people wont yell at you for driving too slow
TG what are you talking about, that tripod from the Jetsons I posted has chick magnet written all over it. 😉
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:24 AM #178469
temeculaguy
ParticipantI’m still backing Tesla. http://www.teslamotors.com/
They went into full production two weeks ago, looks like they figured out the transmission problem and are now boasting 0-60 in 3.9 seconds with a 135mpg equivalent at .02 cost per mile. The big difference is that other than the rest of the green cars, women will want to ride in your Tesla, nobody can steal it because they wont be able to power it up and old people wont yell at you for driving too slow. They will hit the streets in a few months. Their marketing strategy is brilliant, rather than market to eggheads or environmentalists, their first design is the fastest and sexiest thing on the road, every celeb has already bought one. Next they will come out with their planned 4 dr that is closer to 50k, then it’s on like Donkey Kong. -
March 29, 2008 at 11:24 AM #178480
temeculaguy
ParticipantI’m still backing Tesla. http://www.teslamotors.com/
They went into full production two weeks ago, looks like they figured out the transmission problem and are now boasting 0-60 in 3.9 seconds with a 135mpg equivalent at .02 cost per mile. The big difference is that other than the rest of the green cars, women will want to ride in your Tesla, nobody can steal it because they wont be able to power it up and old people wont yell at you for driving too slow. They will hit the streets in a few months. Their marketing strategy is brilliant, rather than market to eggheads or environmentalists, their first design is the fastest and sexiest thing on the road, every celeb has already bought one. Next they will come out with their planned 4 dr that is closer to 50k, then it’s on like Donkey Kong. -
March 29, 2008 at 11:24 AM #178482
temeculaguy
ParticipantI’m still backing Tesla. http://www.teslamotors.com/
They went into full production two weeks ago, looks like they figured out the transmission problem and are now boasting 0-60 in 3.9 seconds with a 135mpg equivalent at .02 cost per mile. The big difference is that other than the rest of the green cars, women will want to ride in your Tesla, nobody can steal it because they wont be able to power it up and old people wont yell at you for driving too slow. They will hit the streets in a few months. Their marketing strategy is brilliant, rather than market to eggheads or environmentalists, their first design is the fastest and sexiest thing on the road, every celeb has already bought one. Next they will come out with their planned 4 dr that is closer to 50k, then it’s on like Donkey Kong. -
March 29, 2008 at 11:24 AM #178568
temeculaguy
ParticipantI’m still backing Tesla. http://www.teslamotors.com/
They went into full production two weeks ago, looks like they figured out the transmission problem and are now boasting 0-60 in 3.9 seconds with a 135mpg equivalent at .02 cost per mile. The big difference is that other than the rest of the green cars, women will want to ride in your Tesla, nobody can steal it because they wont be able to power it up and old people wont yell at you for driving too slow. They will hit the streets in a few months. Their marketing strategy is brilliant, rather than market to eggheads or environmentalists, their first design is the fastest and sexiest thing on the road, every celeb has already bought one. Next they will come out with their planned 4 dr that is closer to 50k, then it’s on like Donkey Kong.
-
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:55 AM #178449
kewp
ParticipantIt’s not really getting 300mpg, as its using the batteries as well. I gets something like 130mpg once the batteries are depleted.
I prefer the VentureOne.
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:55 AM #178460
kewp
ParticipantIt’s not really getting 300mpg, as its using the batteries as well. I gets something like 130mpg once the batteries are depleted.
I prefer the VentureOne.
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:55 AM #178461
kewp
ParticipantIt’s not really getting 300mpg, as its using the batteries as well. I gets something like 130mpg once the batteries are depleted.
I prefer the VentureOne.
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:55 AM #178545
kewp
ParticipantIt’s not really getting 300mpg, as its using the batteries as well. I gets something like 130mpg once the batteries are depleted.
I prefer the VentureOne.
-
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:42 AM #178439
CostaMesa
ParticipantI’d caution that 300mpg is only possible when transporting a less-than human sized load of material – using any of the known methods of propulsion. The thermodynamic calculations are pretty straightforward.
OK – just read the article. What you don’t pay in gas will be paid in electricity bills.
Eeek. I just outed myself as a total geek. 😀
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:42 AM #178450
CostaMesa
ParticipantI’d caution that 300mpg is only possible when transporting a less-than human sized load of material – using any of the known methods of propulsion. The thermodynamic calculations are pretty straightforward.
OK – just read the article. What you don’t pay in gas will be paid in electricity bills.
Eeek. I just outed myself as a total geek. 😀
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:42 AM #178451
CostaMesa
ParticipantI’d caution that 300mpg is only possible when transporting a less-than human sized load of material – using any of the known methods of propulsion. The thermodynamic calculations are pretty straightforward.
OK – just read the article. What you don’t pay in gas will be paid in electricity bills.
Eeek. I just outed myself as a total geek. 😀
-
March 29, 2008 at 10:42 AM #178535
CostaMesa
ParticipantI’d caution that 300mpg is only possible when transporting a less-than human sized load of material – using any of the known methods of propulsion. The thermodynamic calculations are pretty straightforward.
OK – just read the article. What you don’t pay in gas will be paid in electricity bills.
Eeek. I just outed myself as a total geek. 😀
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:44 AM #178122
Borat
ParticipantVehicles with even higher mileage than this have existed for over 100 years now. They’re called bicycles.
-
March 29, 2008 at 2:22 PM #178177
trex
ParticipantAs I’ve said before, I can get 100mpg of oatmeal on my bike, though that’s alot of fiber to take in.
-
March 29, 2008 at 2:22 PM #178534
trex
ParticipantAs I’ve said before, I can get 100mpg of oatmeal on my bike, though that’s alot of fiber to take in.
-
March 29, 2008 at 2:22 PM #178547
trex
ParticipantAs I’ve said before, I can get 100mpg of oatmeal on my bike, though that’s alot of fiber to take in.
-
March 29, 2008 at 2:22 PM #178550
trex
ParticipantAs I’ve said before, I can get 100mpg of oatmeal on my bike, though that’s alot of fiber to take in.
-
March 29, 2008 at 2:22 PM #178633
trex
ParticipantAs I’ve said before, I can get 100mpg of oatmeal on my bike, though that’s alot of fiber to take in.
-
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:44 AM #178479
Borat
ParticipantVehicles with even higher mileage than this have existed for over 100 years now. They’re called bicycles.
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:44 AM #178491
Borat
ParticipantVehicles with even higher mileage than this have existed for over 100 years now. They’re called bicycles.
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:44 AM #178492
Borat
ParticipantVehicles with even higher mileage than this have existed for over 100 years now. They’re called bicycles.
-
March 29, 2008 at 11:44 AM #178578
Borat
ParticipantVehicles with even higher mileage than this have existed for over 100 years now. They’re called bicycles.
-
March 30, 2008 at 8:38 AM #178346
34f3f3f
ParticipantI don’t think the Carlsbad company will make it, because not enough went into the design. The Ventura One on the other hand has a lot going for it, and no doubt will be in the next Bond movie, and will knock the Smart Car off it’s pedestal, which may becoming a little tired (at least in Europe), and the US version not being as cute anyway. However, it’s high price tag is not in it’s favor. Another toy for the rich, or would-be born-again-biker, ergo lack of mass market it’s probably doomed to failure.
-
March 30, 2008 at 8:38 AM #178704
34f3f3f
ParticipantI don’t think the Carlsbad company will make it, because not enough went into the design. The Ventura One on the other hand has a lot going for it, and no doubt will be in the next Bond movie, and will knock the Smart Car off it’s pedestal, which may becoming a little tired (at least in Europe), and the US version not being as cute anyway. However, it’s high price tag is not in it’s favor. Another toy for the rich, or would-be born-again-biker, ergo lack of mass market it’s probably doomed to failure.
-
March 30, 2008 at 8:38 AM #178715
34f3f3f
ParticipantI don’t think the Carlsbad company will make it, because not enough went into the design. The Ventura One on the other hand has a lot going for it, and no doubt will be in the next Bond movie, and will knock the Smart Car off it’s pedestal, which may becoming a little tired (at least in Europe), and the US version not being as cute anyway. However, it’s high price tag is not in it’s favor. Another toy for the rich, or would-be born-again-biker, ergo lack of mass market it’s probably doomed to failure.
-
March 30, 2008 at 8:38 AM #178722
34f3f3f
ParticipantI don’t think the Carlsbad company will make it, because not enough went into the design. The Ventura One on the other hand has a lot going for it, and no doubt will be in the next Bond movie, and will knock the Smart Car off it’s pedestal, which may becoming a little tired (at least in Europe), and the US version not being as cute anyway. However, it’s high price tag is not in it’s favor. Another toy for the rich, or would-be born-again-biker, ergo lack of mass market it’s probably doomed to failure.
-
March 30, 2008 at 8:38 AM #178802
34f3f3f
ParticipantI don’t think the Carlsbad company will make it, because not enough went into the design. The Ventura One on the other hand has a lot going for it, and no doubt will be in the next Bond movie, and will knock the Smart Car off it’s pedestal, which may becoming a little tired (at least in Europe), and the US version not being as cute anyway. However, it’s high price tag is not in it’s favor. Another toy for the rich, or would-be born-again-biker, ergo lack of mass market it’s probably doomed to failure.
-
March 30, 2008 at 9:05 AM #178351
kewp
ParticipantHmmm, here’s an idea…
Buy a nice plot of land in the IE…
Build a zero-house, http://www.zerohouse.net/
Commute to the coast in a venture one!
-
March 30, 2008 at 9:05 AM #178709
kewp
ParticipantHmmm, here’s an idea…
Buy a nice plot of land in the IE…
Build a zero-house, http://www.zerohouse.net/
Commute to the coast in a venture one!
-
March 30, 2008 at 9:05 AM #178720
kewp
ParticipantHmmm, here’s an idea…
Buy a nice plot of land in the IE…
Build a zero-house, http://www.zerohouse.net/
Commute to the coast in a venture one!
-
March 30, 2008 at 9:05 AM #178727
kewp
ParticipantHmmm, here’s an idea…
Buy a nice plot of land in the IE…
Build a zero-house, http://www.zerohouse.net/
Commute to the coast in a venture one!
-
March 30, 2008 at 9:05 AM #178809
kewp
ParticipantHmmm, here’s an idea…
Buy a nice plot of land in the IE…
Build a zero-house, http://www.zerohouse.net/
Commute to the coast in a venture one!
-
March 30, 2008 at 10:48 PM #178640
Coronita
ParticipantMy preferences would echo TG's post. In fact, my pecking order would be
1. Tesla Roadster to be more green and offset me ruining the environment for my #2-4 pick
2. Nissan GTR
3. Audi R8-v10Diesel if that ever sees the light
4. Audi RS5 if that ever sees the light.
 #1 speaks for itself.
#2 schools just about schools most everything else out there. http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
March 31, 2008 at 5:53 AM #178691
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantCheap lithium ion batteries are coming !!
-
March 31, 2008 at 5:53 AM #179054
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantCheap lithium ion batteries are coming !!
-
March 31, 2008 at 5:53 AM #179061
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantCheap lithium ion batteries are coming !!
-
March 31, 2008 at 5:53 AM #179068
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantCheap lithium ion batteries are coming !!
-
March 31, 2008 at 5:53 AM #179149
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantCheap lithium ion batteries are coming !!
-
-
March 30, 2008 at 10:48 PM #179003
Coronita
ParticipantMy preferences would echo TG's post. In fact, my pecking order would be
1. Tesla Roadster to be more green and offset me ruining the environment for my #2-4 pick
2. Nissan GTR
3. Audi R8-v10Diesel if that ever sees the light
4. Audi RS5 if that ever sees the light.
 #1 speaks for itself.
#2 schools just about schools most everything else out there. http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
March 30, 2008 at 10:48 PM #179012
Coronita
ParticipantMy preferences would echo TG's post. In fact, my pecking order would be
1. Tesla Roadster to be more green and offset me ruining the environment for my #2-4 pick
2. Nissan GTR
3. Audi R8-v10Diesel if that ever sees the light
4. Audi RS5 if that ever sees the light.
 #1 speaks for itself.
#2 schools just about schools most everything else out there. http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
March 30, 2008 at 10:48 PM #179019
Coronita
ParticipantMy preferences would echo TG's post. In fact, my pecking order would be
1. Tesla Roadster to be more green and offset me ruining the environment for my #2-4 pick
2. Nissan GTR
3. Audi R8-v10Diesel if that ever sees the light
4. Audi RS5 if that ever sees the light.
 #1 speaks for itself.
#2 schools just about schools most everything else out there. http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
March 30, 2008 at 10:48 PM #179096
Coronita
ParticipantMy preferences would echo TG's post. In fact, my pecking order would be
1. Tesla Roadster to be more green and offset me ruining the environment for my #2-4 pick
2. Nissan GTR
3. Audi R8-v10Diesel if that ever sees the light
4. Audi RS5 if that ever sees the light.
 #1 speaks for itself.
#2 schools just about schools most everything else out there. http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.