- This topic has 1,060 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 24, 2010 at 2:56 PM #623223October 24, 2010 at 3:03 PM #622144
SK in CV
Participant[quote=jstoesz][quote]Keep repeating it. It won’t make it any more true. Research its origin. It is a laughable argument.[/quote]
It is certainly not trying to fit evolution into the confines of a literary device known as a story (the two Genesis stories). The origins of the basic concepts of ID go back to Plato and his thoughts of the Unmoved Mover. [/quote]
It is trying to fit creationism into the confines of SCOTUS decisions (See Edwards v. Aguillard 1987), which prohibited the teaching of creationism in public schools. Its modern existence as a concept, coincides exactly with that decision. It is a modern re-invention of Evangelical Christian, Charles Thaxton. It is not science. It is an excuse.
October 24, 2010 at 3:03 PM #622227Participant[quote=jstoesz][quote]Keep repeating it. It won’t make it any more true. Research its origin. It is a laughable argument.[/quote]
It is certainly not trying to fit evolution into the confines of a literary device known as a story (the two Genesis stories). The origins of the basic concepts of ID go back to Plato and his thoughts of the Unmoved Mover. [/quote]
It is trying to fit creationism into the confines of SCOTUS decisions (See Edwards v. Aguillard 1987), which prohibited the teaching of creationism in public schools. Its modern existence as a concept, coincides exactly with that decision. It is a modern re-invention of Evangelical Christian, Charles Thaxton. It is not science. It is an excuse.
October 24, 2010 at 3:03 PM #622787Participant[quote=jstoesz][quote]Keep repeating it. It won’t make it any more true. Research its origin. It is a laughable argument.[/quote]
It is certainly not trying to fit evolution into the confines of a literary device known as a story (the two Genesis stories). The origins of the basic concepts of ID go back to Plato and his thoughts of the Unmoved Mover. [/quote]
It is trying to fit creationism into the confines of SCOTUS decisions (See Edwards v. Aguillard 1987), which prohibited the teaching of creationism in public schools. Its modern existence as a concept, coincides exactly with that decision. It is a modern re-invention of Evangelical Christian, Charles Thaxton. It is not science. It is an excuse.
October 24, 2010 at 3:03 PM #622911Participant[quote=jstoesz][quote]Keep repeating it. It won’t make it any more true. Research its origin. It is a laughable argument.[/quote]
It is certainly not trying to fit evolution into the confines of a literary device known as a story (the two Genesis stories). The origins of the basic concepts of ID go back to Plato and his thoughts of the Unmoved Mover. [/quote]
It is trying to fit creationism into the confines of SCOTUS decisions (See Edwards v. Aguillard 1987), which prohibited the teaching of creationism in public schools. Its modern existence as a concept, coincides exactly with that decision. It is a modern re-invention of Evangelical Christian, Charles Thaxton. It is not science. It is an excuse.
October 24, 2010 at 3:03 PM #623228Participant[quote=jstoesz][quote]Keep repeating it. It won’t make it any more true. Research its origin. It is a laughable argument.[/quote]
It is certainly not trying to fit evolution into the confines of a literary device known as a story (the two Genesis stories). The origins of the basic concepts of ID go back to Plato and his thoughts of the Unmoved Mover. [/quote]
It is trying to fit creationism into the confines of SCOTUS decisions (See Edwards v. Aguillard 1987), which prohibited the teaching of creationism in public schools. Its modern existence as a concept, coincides exactly with that decision. It is a modern re-invention of Evangelical Christian, Charles Thaxton. It is not science. It is an excuse.
October 24, 2010 at 3:08 PM #622149jstoesz
Participant[quote]Thats not what I want to teach my child. Its the worst argument I have ever heard. If you cant find an answer just say “bcauase God did it”. That is not what I want to teach my child. It is anti citical thinking.[/quote]
We are in agreement on one thing here. I don’t want to teach your child ID either.
Do you seek to control the education of other peoples children? I don’t…
October 24, 2010 at 3:08 PM #622232Participant[quote]Thats not what I want to teach my child. Its the worst argument I have ever heard. If you cant find an answer just say “bcauase God did it”. That is not what I want to teach my child. It is anti citical thinking.[/quote]
We are in agreement on one thing here. I don’t want to teach your child ID either.
Do you seek to control the education of other peoples children? I don’t…
October 24, 2010 at 3:08 PM #622792Participant[quote]Thats not what I want to teach my child. Its the worst argument I have ever heard. If you cant find an answer just say “bcauase God did it”. That is not what I want to teach my child. It is anti citical thinking.[/quote]
We are in agreement on one thing here. I don’t want to teach your child ID either.
Do you seek to control the education of other peoples children? I don’t…
October 24, 2010 at 3:08 PM #622916Participant[quote]Thats not what I want to teach my child. Its the worst argument I have ever heard. If you cant find an answer just say “bcauase God did it”. That is not what I want to teach my child. It is anti citical thinking.[/quote]
We are in agreement on one thing here. I don’t want to teach your child ID either.
Do you seek to control the education of other peoples children? I don’t…
October 24, 2010 at 3:08 PM #623233Participant[quote]Thats not what I want to teach my child. Its the worst argument I have ever heard. If you cant find an answer just say “bcauase God did it”. That is not what I want to teach my child. It is anti citical thinking.[/quote]
We are in agreement on one thing here. I don’t want to teach your child ID either.
Do you seek to control the education of other peoples children? I don’t…
October 24, 2010 at 3:11 PM #622154scaredyclassic
ParticipantHey where did all this stuff come from? Weird.
It’s nice that it’s here.
Still I don’t feel particularly grateful to any entity … Just kind of occasionally awed. Mostly just going back and forth on the greasy rat trail of human life though.
October 24, 2010 at 3:11 PM #622237ParticipantHey where did all this stuff come from? Weird.
It’s nice that it’s here.
Still I don’t feel particularly grateful to any entity … Just kind of occasionally awed. Mostly just going back and forth on the greasy rat trail of human life though.
October 24, 2010 at 3:11 PM #622797ParticipantHey where did all this stuff come from? Weird.
It’s nice that it’s here.
Still I don’t feel particularly grateful to any entity … Just kind of occasionally awed. Mostly just going back and forth on the greasy rat trail of human life though.
October 24, 2010 at 3:11 PM #622921ParticipantHey where did all this stuff come from? Weird.
It’s nice that it’s here.
Still I don’t feel particularly grateful to any entity … Just kind of occasionally awed. Mostly just going back and forth on the greasy rat trail of human life though.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.