Menu

Home › Forums › Other › OMG – Someone please control Christine O’donnell

  • This topic has 1,060 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by patb.
Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 1,061 total)
1 2 3 … 20 21 22 … 69 70 71
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 20, 2010 at 2:56 PM #621870
    afx114
    Participant

    I agree that in theory the Tea Party (and 3rd parties in general) are a great idea that can be a balancing force. Unfortunately what has happened is that the movement has been co-opted by the big boys and they have nurtured it into a Frankenstein that is sure to eat its own creator. I don’t think it serves anyone well, except for certain Democratic candidates in Delaware.

    October 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM #620812
    UCGal
    Participant

    Speaking of O’Donnell

    Looks like she’s got competition…

    October 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM #620892
    UCGal
    Participant

    Speaking of O’Donnell

    Looks like she’s got competition…

    October 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM #621450
    UCGal
    Participant

    Speaking of O’Donnell

    Looks like she’s got competition…

    October 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM #621571
    UCGal
    Participant

    Speaking of O’Donnell

    Looks like she’s got competition…

    October 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM #621890
    UCGal
    Participant

    Speaking of O’Donnell

    Looks like she’s got competition…

    October 20, 2010 at 3:16 PM #620817
    ucodegen
    Participant

    [quote afx114]Thou shalt not commit adultery.
    There are a few laws with respect to this, but we all know that adultery and divorce are commonplace — and perfectly legal — in America.
    [/quote]
    I did not have sexual relations with that woman – Clinton…

    Couldn’t resist! ;-P

    October 20, 2010 at 3:16 PM #620897
    ucodegen
    Participant

    [quote afx114]Thou shalt not commit adultery.
    There are a few laws with respect to this, but we all know that adultery and divorce are commonplace — and perfectly legal — in America.
    [/quote]
    I did not have sexual relations with that woman – Clinton…

    Couldn’t resist! ;-P

    October 20, 2010 at 3:16 PM #621455
    ucodegen
    Participant

    [quote afx114]Thou shalt not commit adultery.
    There are a few laws with respect to this, but we all know that adultery and divorce are commonplace — and perfectly legal — in America.
    [/quote]
    I did not have sexual relations with that woman – Clinton…

    Couldn’t resist! ;-P

    October 20, 2010 at 3:16 PM #621576
    ucodegen
    Participant

    [quote afx114]Thou shalt not commit adultery.
    There are a few laws with respect to this, but we all know that adultery and divorce are commonplace — and perfectly legal — in America.
    [/quote]
    I did not have sexual relations with that woman – Clinton…

    Couldn’t resist! ;-P

    October 20, 2010 at 3:16 PM #621895
    ucodegen
    Participant

    [quote afx114]Thou shalt not commit adultery.
    There are a few laws with respect to this, but we all know that adultery and divorce are commonplace — and perfectly legal — in America.
    [/quote]
    I did not have sexual relations with that woman – Clinton…

    Couldn’t resist! ;-P

    October 20, 2010 at 10:01 PM #620920
    BKlawyer
    Participant

    You HAVE to be kidding me, right? I want to hear from you guys the night after the election. Don’t worry, by then Obama will have fled the jurisdiction. Your/The fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution and the bill of rights by you knuckleheads is amazing! I don’t know where to begin other than to look at KKK member Hugo Black’s 1947 decisions to begin this discussion. You guys are regularly a pretty sober group but apparently your impending losses are causing a bleed out.
    For a total bastardization of the constitutiuon and BORs, PLEASE read up on current Justice Breyer’s affections for foreign policy to shape current Court decisions regarding death penalty, etc. Of course, while he advocates outlawing it based on Sweden or some other country’s policies, he fails to embrace amputation for theft or stoning for adultery. How about forced abortion in China (I suspect a lot of you would give a “thumbs-up” to that). Hey! Female Circumscision? Why are we stopping at death penalty policy? Because you pick your opinion and work backwards. Instead of adhering to principle and pushing forwards.

    October 20, 2010 at 10:01 PM #621001
    BKlawyer
    Participant

    You HAVE to be kidding me, right? I want to hear from you guys the night after the election. Don’t worry, by then Obama will have fled the jurisdiction. Your/The fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution and the bill of rights by you knuckleheads is amazing! I don’t know where to begin other than to look at KKK member Hugo Black’s 1947 decisions to begin this discussion. You guys are regularly a pretty sober group but apparently your impending losses are causing a bleed out.
    For a total bastardization of the constitutiuon and BORs, PLEASE read up on current Justice Breyer’s affections for foreign policy to shape current Court decisions regarding death penalty, etc. Of course, while he advocates outlawing it based on Sweden or some other country’s policies, he fails to embrace amputation for theft or stoning for adultery. How about forced abortion in China (I suspect a lot of you would give a “thumbs-up” to that). Hey! Female Circumscision? Why are we stopping at death penalty policy? Because you pick your opinion and work backwards. Instead of adhering to principle and pushing forwards.

    October 20, 2010 at 10:01 PM #621559
    BKlawyer
    Participant

    You HAVE to be kidding me, right? I want to hear from you guys the night after the election. Don’t worry, by then Obama will have fled the jurisdiction. Your/The fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution and the bill of rights by you knuckleheads is amazing! I don’t know where to begin other than to look at KKK member Hugo Black’s 1947 decisions to begin this discussion. You guys are regularly a pretty sober group but apparently your impending losses are causing a bleed out.
    For a total bastardization of the constitutiuon and BORs, PLEASE read up on current Justice Breyer’s affections for foreign policy to shape current Court decisions regarding death penalty, etc. Of course, while he advocates outlawing it based on Sweden or some other country’s policies, he fails to embrace amputation for theft or stoning for adultery. How about forced abortion in China (I suspect a lot of you would give a “thumbs-up” to that). Hey! Female Circumscision? Why are we stopping at death penalty policy? Because you pick your opinion and work backwards. Instead of adhering to principle and pushing forwards.

    October 20, 2010 at 10:01 PM #621681
    BKlawyer
    Participant

    You HAVE to be kidding me, right? I want to hear from you guys the night after the election. Don’t worry, by then Obama will have fled the jurisdiction. Your/The fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution and the bill of rights by you knuckleheads is amazing! I don’t know where to begin other than to look at KKK member Hugo Black’s 1947 decisions to begin this discussion. You guys are regularly a pretty sober group but apparently your impending losses are causing a bleed out.
    For a total bastardization of the constitutiuon and BORs, PLEASE read up on current Justice Breyer’s affections for foreign policy to shape current Court decisions regarding death penalty, etc. Of course, while he advocates outlawing it based on Sweden or some other country’s policies, he fails to embrace amputation for theft or stoning for adultery. How about forced abortion in China (I suspect a lot of you would give a “thumbs-up” to that). Hey! Female Circumscision? Why are we stopping at death penalty policy? Because you pick your opinion and work backwards. Instead of adhering to principle and pushing forwards.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 1,061 total)
1 2 3 … 20 21 22 … 69 70 71
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.