- This topic has 1,060 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 20, 2010 at 2:56 PM #621870October 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM #620812UCGalParticipant
Speaking of O’Donnell
Looks like she’s got competition…
October 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM #620892UCGalParticipantSpeaking of O’Donnell
Looks like she’s got competition…
October 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM #621450UCGalParticipantSpeaking of O’Donnell
Looks like she’s got competition…
October 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM #621571UCGalParticipantSpeaking of O’Donnell
Looks like she’s got competition…
October 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM #621890UCGalParticipantSpeaking of O’Donnell
Looks like she’s got competition…
October 20, 2010 at 3:16 PM #620817ucodegenParticipant[quote afx114]Thou shalt not commit adultery.
There are a few laws with respect to this, but we all know that adultery and divorce are commonplace — and perfectly legal — in America.
[/quote]
I did not have sexual relations with that woman – Clinton…Couldn’t resist! ;-P
October 20, 2010 at 3:16 PM #620897ucodegenParticipant[quote afx114]Thou shalt not commit adultery.
There are a few laws with respect to this, but we all know that adultery and divorce are commonplace — and perfectly legal — in America.
[/quote]
I did not have sexual relations with that woman – Clinton…Couldn’t resist! ;-P
October 20, 2010 at 3:16 PM #621455ucodegenParticipant[quote afx114]Thou shalt not commit adultery.
There are a few laws with respect to this, but we all know that adultery and divorce are commonplace — and perfectly legal — in America.
[/quote]
I did not have sexual relations with that woman – Clinton…Couldn’t resist! ;-P
October 20, 2010 at 3:16 PM #621576ucodegenParticipant[quote afx114]Thou shalt not commit adultery.
There are a few laws with respect to this, but we all know that adultery and divorce are commonplace — and perfectly legal — in America.
[/quote]
I did not have sexual relations with that woman – Clinton…Couldn’t resist! ;-P
October 20, 2010 at 3:16 PM #621895ucodegenParticipant[quote afx114]Thou shalt not commit adultery.
There are a few laws with respect to this, but we all know that adultery and divorce are commonplace — and perfectly legal — in America.
[/quote]
I did not have sexual relations with that woman – Clinton…Couldn’t resist! ;-P
October 20, 2010 at 10:01 PM #620920BKlawyerParticipantYou HAVE to be kidding me, right? I want to hear from you guys the night after the election. Don’t worry, by then Obama will have fled the jurisdiction. Your/The fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution and the bill of rights by you knuckleheads is amazing! I don’t know where to begin other than to look at KKK member Hugo Black’s 1947 decisions to begin this discussion. You guys are regularly a pretty sober group but apparently your impending losses are causing a bleed out.
For a total bastardization of the constitutiuon and BORs, PLEASE read up on current Justice Breyer’s affections for foreign policy to shape current Court decisions regarding death penalty, etc. Of course, while he advocates outlawing it based on Sweden or some other country’s policies, he fails to embrace amputation for theft or stoning for adultery. How about forced abortion in China (I suspect a lot of you would give a “thumbs-up” to that). Hey! Female Circumscision? Why are we stopping at death penalty policy? Because you pick your opinion and work backwards. Instead of adhering to principle and pushing forwards.October 20, 2010 at 10:01 PM #621001BKlawyerParticipantYou HAVE to be kidding me, right? I want to hear from you guys the night after the election. Don’t worry, by then Obama will have fled the jurisdiction. Your/The fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution and the bill of rights by you knuckleheads is amazing! I don’t know where to begin other than to look at KKK member Hugo Black’s 1947 decisions to begin this discussion. You guys are regularly a pretty sober group but apparently your impending losses are causing a bleed out.
For a total bastardization of the constitutiuon and BORs, PLEASE read up on current Justice Breyer’s affections for foreign policy to shape current Court decisions regarding death penalty, etc. Of course, while he advocates outlawing it based on Sweden or some other country’s policies, he fails to embrace amputation for theft or stoning for adultery. How about forced abortion in China (I suspect a lot of you would give a “thumbs-up” to that). Hey! Female Circumscision? Why are we stopping at death penalty policy? Because you pick your opinion and work backwards. Instead of adhering to principle and pushing forwards.October 20, 2010 at 10:01 PM #621559BKlawyerParticipantYou HAVE to be kidding me, right? I want to hear from you guys the night after the election. Don’t worry, by then Obama will have fled the jurisdiction. Your/The fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution and the bill of rights by you knuckleheads is amazing! I don’t know where to begin other than to look at KKK member Hugo Black’s 1947 decisions to begin this discussion. You guys are regularly a pretty sober group but apparently your impending losses are causing a bleed out.
For a total bastardization of the constitutiuon and BORs, PLEASE read up on current Justice Breyer’s affections for foreign policy to shape current Court decisions regarding death penalty, etc. Of course, while he advocates outlawing it based on Sweden or some other country’s policies, he fails to embrace amputation for theft or stoning for adultery. How about forced abortion in China (I suspect a lot of you would give a “thumbs-up” to that). Hey! Female Circumscision? Why are we stopping at death penalty policy? Because you pick your opinion and work backwards. Instead of adhering to principle and pushing forwards.October 20, 2010 at 10:01 PM #621681BKlawyerParticipantYou HAVE to be kidding me, right? I want to hear from you guys the night after the election. Don’t worry, by then Obama will have fled the jurisdiction. Your/The fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution and the bill of rights by you knuckleheads is amazing! I don’t know where to begin other than to look at KKK member Hugo Black’s 1947 decisions to begin this discussion. You guys are regularly a pretty sober group but apparently your impending losses are causing a bleed out.
For a total bastardization of the constitutiuon and BORs, PLEASE read up on current Justice Breyer’s affections for foreign policy to shape current Court decisions regarding death penalty, etc. Of course, while he advocates outlawing it based on Sweden or some other country’s policies, he fails to embrace amputation for theft or stoning for adultery. How about forced abortion in China (I suspect a lot of you would give a “thumbs-up” to that). Hey! Female Circumscision? Why are we stopping at death penalty policy? Because you pick your opinion and work backwards. Instead of adhering to principle and pushing forwards. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.