- This topic has 45 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by Raybyrnes.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 14, 2008 at 11:04 AM #270021September 14, 2008 at 8:41 PM #270517RaybyrnesParticipant
I don’t like MR eithe but how is it a farce.When new property is developed on a grand scale city resources are going to be tapped into by the owner. Scools get hit with more student and have to hire more teachers . Utilities need to be wired up, sewer system used more, street and roads more utilized. So who is suppose to pay for this.
If yo put it to the builder then he is going to add it to his purchase price. If the purchase price which includes MR is not in line with the market and his profit motive then he is going to walk and the project does not move forward.
If o don’t like MR (I am not a fan) fine . But to say that the developers are getting some sort of free pass suggests a lack of top down understanding of what those fees are for.
September 14, 2008 at 8:41 PM #270543RaybyrnesParticipantI don’t like MR eithe but how is it a farce.When new property is developed on a grand scale city resources are going to be tapped into by the owner. Scools get hit with more student and have to hire more teachers . Utilities need to be wired up, sewer system used more, street and roads more utilized. So who is suppose to pay for this.
If yo put it to the builder then he is going to add it to his purchase price. If the purchase price which includes MR is not in line with the market and his profit motive then he is going to walk and the project does not move forward.
If o don’t like MR (I am not a fan) fine . But to say that the developers are getting some sort of free pass suggests a lack of top down understanding of what those fees are for.
September 14, 2008 at 8:41 PM #270465RaybyrnesParticipantI don’t like MR eithe but how is it a farce.When new property is developed on a grand scale city resources are going to be tapped into by the owner. Scools get hit with more student and have to hire more teachers . Utilities need to be wired up, sewer system used more, street and roads more utilized. So who is suppose to pay for this.
If yo put it to the builder then he is going to add it to his purchase price. If the purchase price which includes MR is not in line with the market and his profit motive then he is going to walk and the project does not move forward.
If o don’t like MR (I am not a fan) fine . But to say that the developers are getting some sort of free pass suggests a lack of top down understanding of what those fees are for.
September 14, 2008 at 8:41 PM #270468RaybyrnesParticipantI don’t like MR eithe but how is it a farce.When new property is developed on a grand scale city resources are going to be tapped into by the owner. Scools get hit with more student and have to hire more teachers . Utilities need to be wired up, sewer system used more, street and roads more utilized. So who is suppose to pay for this.
If yo put it to the builder then he is going to add it to his purchase price. If the purchase price which includes MR is not in line with the market and his profit motive then he is going to walk and the project does not move forward.
If o don’t like MR (I am not a fan) fine . But to say that the developers are getting some sort of free pass suggests a lack of top down understanding of what those fees are for.
September 14, 2008 at 8:41 PM #270230RaybyrnesParticipantI don’t like MR eithe but how is it a farce.When new property is developed on a grand scale city resources are going to be tapped into by the owner. Scools get hit with more student and have to hire more teachers . Utilities need to be wired up, sewer system used more, street and roads more utilized. So who is suppose to pay for this.
If yo put it to the builder then he is going to add it to his purchase price. If the purchase price which includes MR is not in line with the market and his profit motive then he is going to walk and the project does not move forward.
If o don’t like MR (I am not a fan) fine . But to say that the developers are getting some sort of free pass suggests a lack of top down understanding of what those fees are for.
September 14, 2008 at 8:41 PM #270470RaybyrnesParticipantdup
September 14, 2008 at 8:41 PM #270474RaybyrnesParticipantdup
September 14, 2008 at 8:41 PM #270548RaybyrnesParticipantdup
September 14, 2008 at 8:41 PM #270235RaybyrnesParticipantdup
September 14, 2008 at 8:41 PM #270522RaybyrnesParticipantdup
September 14, 2008 at 8:50 PM #270246SD RealtorParticipantIt always serves well for people to find out more about Mello Roos. In the past I have posted links to find out the origins of it. Go ahead and google Mello Roos in California and you will find the origins which in a nutshell simply were created by politicians in order to make up for loss of revenue created by prop 13.
September 14, 2008 at 8:50 PM #270480SD RealtorParticipantIt always serves well for people to find out more about Mello Roos. In the past I have posted links to find out the origins of it. Go ahead and google Mello Roos in California and you will find the origins which in a nutshell simply were created by politicians in order to make up for loss of revenue created by prop 13.
September 14, 2008 at 8:50 PM #270484SD RealtorParticipantIt always serves well for people to find out more about Mello Roos. In the past I have posted links to find out the origins of it. Go ahead and google Mello Roos in California and you will find the origins which in a nutshell simply were created by politicians in order to make up for loss of revenue created by prop 13.
September 14, 2008 at 8:50 PM #270558SD RealtorParticipantIt always serves well for people to find out more about Mello Roos. In the past I have posted links to find out the origins of it. Go ahead and google Mello Roos in California and you will find the origins which in a nutshell simply were created by politicians in order to make up for loss of revenue created by prop 13.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.