- This topic has 95 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM #251947August 4, 2008 at 11:15 AM #252099meadandaleParticipant
[quote=sdduuuude]This guy is a total troll. I would flag this for deletion if I could[/quote]
You SAW the heading before you ever clicked on it to read it. Just couldn’t resist, could you?
Why is it that liberals are always the defenders of free speech only when the speech is something they agree with? That’s the whole point of the first amendment you goofballs, to prevent people like you from silencing the rantings of those they don’t agree with.
I may not agree with some of the more bizarre right wing diatribes that get posted but it would never cross my mind to try and censor or censure them. I just chuckle and move on. Pity you can’t do the same without calling for them to be banned, flagged or drawn and quartered.
August 4, 2008 at 11:15 AM #251867meadandaleParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]This guy is a total troll. I would flag this for deletion if I could[/quote]
You SAW the heading before you ever clicked on it to read it. Just couldn’t resist, could you?
Why is it that liberals are always the defenders of free speech only when the speech is something they agree with? That’s the whole point of the first amendment you goofballs, to prevent people like you from silencing the rantings of those they don’t agree with.
I may not agree with some of the more bizarre right wing diatribes that get posted but it would never cross my mind to try and censor or censure them. I just chuckle and move on. Pity you can’t do the same without calling for them to be banned, flagged or drawn and quartered.
August 4, 2008 at 11:15 AM #252093meadandaleParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]This guy is a total troll. I would flag this for deletion if I could[/quote]
You SAW the heading before you ever clicked on it to read it. Just couldn’t resist, could you?
Why is it that liberals are always the defenders of free speech only when the speech is something they agree with? That’s the whole point of the first amendment you goofballs, to prevent people like you from silencing the rantings of those they don’t agree with.
I may not agree with some of the more bizarre right wing diatribes that get posted but it would never cross my mind to try and censor or censure them. I just chuckle and move on. Pity you can’t do the same without calling for them to be banned, flagged or drawn and quartered.
August 4, 2008 at 11:15 AM #252028meadandaleParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]This guy is a total troll. I would flag this for deletion if I could[/quote]
You SAW the heading before you ever clicked on it to read it. Just couldn’t resist, could you?
Why is it that liberals are always the defenders of free speech only when the speech is something they agree with? That’s the whole point of the first amendment you goofballs, to prevent people like you from silencing the rantings of those they don’t agree with.
I may not agree with some of the more bizarre right wing diatribes that get posted but it would never cross my mind to try and censor or censure them. I just chuckle and move on. Pity you can’t do the same without calling for them to be banned, flagged or drawn and quartered.
August 4, 2008 at 11:15 AM #252036meadandaleParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]This guy is a total troll. I would flag this for deletion if I could[/quote]
You SAW the heading before you ever clicked on it to read it. Just couldn’t resist, could you?
Why is it that liberals are always the defenders of free speech only when the speech is something they agree with? That’s the whole point of the first amendment you goofballs, to prevent people like you from silencing the rantings of those they don’t agree with.
I may not agree with some of the more bizarre right wing diatribes that get posted but it would never cross my mind to try and censor or censure them. I just chuckle and move on. Pity you can’t do the same without calling for them to be banned, flagged or drawn and quartered.
August 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM #252113seattle-reloParticipantI agree that off topics are very interesting and enjoyable, but yours in particular are so extreme!
And was your point actually about our leaders I.Q. or how the media tends to be biased at times? Because it wasn’t clear to me.
I personally like balance between the ideaology of both parties. I vote based on the person, not the party.What was wrong with my video, it was totally relevant to your post! You’re a big poo-poo head with no sense of humor!
August 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM #252119seattle-reloParticipantI agree that off topics are very interesting and enjoyable, but yours in particular are so extreme!
And was your point actually about our leaders I.Q. or how the media tends to be biased at times? Because it wasn’t clear to me.
I personally like balance between the ideaology of both parties. I vote based on the person, not the party.What was wrong with my video, it was totally relevant to your post! You’re a big poo-poo head with no sense of humor!
August 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM #252056seattle-reloParticipantI agree that off topics are very interesting and enjoyable, but yours in particular are so extreme!
And was your point actually about our leaders I.Q. or how the media tends to be biased at times? Because it wasn’t clear to me.
I personally like balance between the ideaology of both parties. I vote based on the person, not the party.What was wrong with my video, it was totally relevant to your post! You’re a big poo-poo head with no sense of humor!
August 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM #252047seattle-reloParticipantI agree that off topics are very interesting and enjoyable, but yours in particular are so extreme!
And was your point actually about our leaders I.Q. or how the media tends to be biased at times? Because it wasn’t clear to me.
I personally like balance between the ideaology of both parties. I vote based on the person, not the party.What was wrong with my video, it was totally relevant to your post! You’re a big poo-poo head with no sense of humor!
August 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM #251887seattle-reloParticipantI agree that off topics are very interesting and enjoyable, but yours in particular are so extreme!
And was your point actually about our leaders I.Q. or how the media tends to be biased at times? Because it wasn’t clear to me.
I personally like balance between the ideaology of both parties. I vote based on the person, not the party.What was wrong with my video, it was totally relevant to your post! You’re a big poo-poo head with no sense of humor!
August 4, 2008 at 11:30 AM #252067sdduuuudeParticipantUh, no. I opened it looked at it just to make the “this guy is a troll” comment.
There is a place for every comment. This is not the place for this crap.
If I wanted to see this B.S. I would join the “Stupid Political Bullshit” forum.
August 4, 2008 at 11:30 AM #252076sdduuuudeParticipantUh, no. I opened it looked at it just to make the “this guy is a troll” comment.
There is a place for every comment. This is not the place for this crap.
If I wanted to see this B.S. I would join the “Stupid Political Bullshit” forum.
August 4, 2008 at 11:30 AM #252133sdduuuudeParticipantUh, no. I opened it looked at it just to make the “this guy is a troll” comment.
There is a place for every comment. This is not the place for this crap.
If I wanted to see this B.S. I would join the “Stupid Political Bullshit” forum.
August 4, 2008 at 11:30 AM #251907sdduuuudeParticipantUh, no. I opened it looked at it just to make the “this guy is a troll” comment.
There is a place for every comment. This is not the place for this crap.
If I wanted to see this B.S. I would join the “Stupid Political Bullshit” forum.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.