- This topic has 265 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by jficquette.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 29, 2008 at 6:30 PM #278100September 29, 2008 at 6:38 PM #277785stockstradrParticipant
I just watched the Pelosi video of her speech on the floor of the house.
I think it is a great speech, a heroic and honest speech. Hooray for Pelosi!
Her speech is to blame for the failed vote? What a ridiculous idea that is.
The republicans don’t have the courage to vote yes, so they spin it, and try to place the blame for the failed vote upon Pelosi’s speech. Cheap political trickery.
September 29, 2008 at 6:38 PM #278047stockstradrParticipantI just watched the Pelosi video of her speech on the floor of the house.
I think it is a great speech, a heroic and honest speech. Hooray for Pelosi!
Her speech is to blame for the failed vote? What a ridiculous idea that is.
The republicans don’t have the courage to vote yes, so they spin it, and try to place the blame for the failed vote upon Pelosi’s speech. Cheap political trickery.
September 29, 2008 at 6:38 PM #278061stockstradrParticipantI just watched the Pelosi video of her speech on the floor of the house.
I think it is a great speech, a heroic and honest speech. Hooray for Pelosi!
Her speech is to blame for the failed vote? What a ridiculous idea that is.
The republicans don’t have the courage to vote yes, so they spin it, and try to place the blame for the failed vote upon Pelosi’s speech. Cheap political trickery.
September 29, 2008 at 6:38 PM #278098stockstradrParticipantI just watched the Pelosi video of her speech on the floor of the house.
I think it is a great speech, a heroic and honest speech. Hooray for Pelosi!
Her speech is to blame for the failed vote? What a ridiculous idea that is.
The republicans don’t have the courage to vote yes, so they spin it, and try to place the blame for the failed vote upon Pelosi’s speech. Cheap political trickery.
September 29, 2008 at 6:38 PM #278110stockstradrParticipantI just watched the Pelosi video of her speech on the floor of the house.
I think it is a great speech, a heroic and honest speech. Hooray for Pelosi!
Her speech is to blame for the failed vote? What a ridiculous idea that is.
The republicans don’t have the courage to vote yes, so they spin it, and try to place the blame for the failed vote upon Pelosi’s speech. Cheap political trickery.
September 29, 2008 at 6:43 PM #277800anParticipantWhy would the republic need to vote yes on something that fundamentally, the democrat wanted? Tell the 40% democrat who voted against it that they don’t have the courage. I applauded all the rep who actually voted NO. They all have great courage to stand up and say no.
September 29, 2008 at 6:43 PM #278062anParticipantWhy would the republic need to vote yes on something that fundamentally, the democrat wanted? Tell the 40% democrat who voted against it that they don’t have the courage. I applauded all the rep who actually voted NO. They all have great courage to stand up and say no.
September 29, 2008 at 6:43 PM #278076anParticipantWhy would the republic need to vote yes on something that fundamentally, the democrat wanted? Tell the 40% democrat who voted against it that they don’t have the courage. I applauded all the rep who actually voted NO. They all have great courage to stand up and say no.
September 29, 2008 at 6:43 PM #278113anParticipantWhy would the republic need to vote yes on something that fundamentally, the democrat wanted? Tell the 40% democrat who voted against it that they don’t have the courage. I applauded all the rep who actually voted NO. They all have great courage to stand up and say no.
September 29, 2008 at 6:43 PM #278125anParticipantWhy would the republic need to vote yes on something that fundamentally, the democrat wanted? Tell the 40% democrat who voted against it that they don’t have the courage. I applauded all the rep who actually voted NO. They all have great courage to stand up and say no.
September 29, 2008 at 6:50 PM #277810ltokudaParticipantI think Bush and Paulson blew this from the very beginning. Their initial bill basically said:
“Give us $700 Billion dollars. We’ll spend it however we like without any oversight. And you can never hold us accountable.”
That bill screamed BAILOUT FOR WALL STREET. Even with all the negotiated changes, the bill still can’t shake that initial public image. At this point, you could come up with a bill that even Warren Buffett would want to invest money in and the public would still see it as nothing more than a bailout for wall street.
If the bill was initially written and marketed as a good investment for America, we would have all been better off. But, of course, that wasn’t Bush and Paulson’s primary concern.
September 29, 2008 at 6:50 PM #278072ltokudaParticipantI think Bush and Paulson blew this from the very beginning. Their initial bill basically said:
“Give us $700 Billion dollars. We’ll spend it however we like without any oversight. And you can never hold us accountable.”
That bill screamed BAILOUT FOR WALL STREET. Even with all the negotiated changes, the bill still can’t shake that initial public image. At this point, you could come up with a bill that even Warren Buffett would want to invest money in and the public would still see it as nothing more than a bailout for wall street.
If the bill was initially written and marketed as a good investment for America, we would have all been better off. But, of course, that wasn’t Bush and Paulson’s primary concern.
September 29, 2008 at 6:50 PM #278086ltokudaParticipantI think Bush and Paulson blew this from the very beginning. Their initial bill basically said:
“Give us $700 Billion dollars. We’ll spend it however we like without any oversight. And you can never hold us accountable.”
That bill screamed BAILOUT FOR WALL STREET. Even with all the negotiated changes, the bill still can’t shake that initial public image. At this point, you could come up with a bill that even Warren Buffett would want to invest money in and the public would still see it as nothing more than a bailout for wall street.
If the bill was initially written and marketed as a good investment for America, we would have all been better off. But, of course, that wasn’t Bush and Paulson’s primary concern.
September 29, 2008 at 6:50 PM #278123ltokudaParticipantI think Bush and Paulson blew this from the very beginning. Their initial bill basically said:
“Give us $700 Billion dollars. We’ll spend it however we like without any oversight. And you can never hold us accountable.”
That bill screamed BAILOUT FOR WALL STREET. Even with all the negotiated changes, the bill still can’t shake that initial public image. At this point, you could come up with a bill that even Warren Buffett would want to invest money in and the public would still see it as nothing more than a bailout for wall street.
If the bill was initially written and marketed as a good investment for America, we would have all been better off. But, of course, that wasn’t Bush and Paulson’s primary concern.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.