obnoxious old sign

[waiting hawk]

Most new people here dont understand how not only we already won the debate on rent vs own years ago on here but dont understand who was really throwing money away. I remember when the houses we wanted were 600-700k and knuckleheads were telling us to buy because we were renting in the same area for $1600 a month. Do the math over 5 years and I won by hundreds of thousands while only “throwing away” 20k a year in rent (and still lived somewhere). It was the best choice I ever made. At some point it will be throwing money away but in most areas it is not there yet. Glad my area made more sence but I am not trying to buy in SD thank god.

[ucodegen]

[[email protected]].[/quote]
It is interesting how the ‘quote’ operator is coming up with this mish-mash. I was expecting something like:

Bill YourFhaGuru.com
.

Maybe it is that you are trying to put an Email address in your name and there is a spam harvester block on this site, that makes it harder for web-crawlers to harvest Email addresses for spamming. Notice that the ‘@’ is done as an image.

From your response here
I would have to ask: “Cat got your tongue? Or maybe briansd1 got your tongue?”

We practice our debating skills on each other here.. and in the process learn to find supporting data within minutes. Bill-so-called-FHA-guru, if you weren’t so busy trying to spam blog sites to further your mortgage broker business, you would have realized that this site might be a bit dangerous to spam. The ‘piggs’ have uncovered several people behind masks, more recently:

http://piggington.com/how_do_i_go_about_investigating_this

Throw in that some of us also visit sites like calculatedrisk.. and you would have realized that this site might end up being toxic to you. You were given a ‘pass’ the first time.. the piggs didn’t unmask you. Repeat offenders tend to get unmasked.

[ucodegen]

[[email protected]].[/quote]
It is interesting how the ‘quote’ operator is coming up with this mish-mash. I was expecting something like:

Bill YourFhaGuru.com
.

Maybe it is that you are trying to put an Email address in your name and there is a spam harvester block on this site, that makes it harder for web-crawlers to harvest Email addresses for spamming. Notice that the ‘@’ is done as an image.

From your response here
I would have to ask: “Cat got your tongue? Or maybe briansd1 got your tongue?”

We practice our debating skills on each other here.. and in the process learn to find supporting data within minutes. Bill-so-called-FHA-guru, if you weren’t so busy trying to spam blog sites to further your mortgage broker business, you would have realized that this site might be a bit dangerous to spam. The ‘piggs’ have uncovered several people behind masks, more recently:

http://piggington.com/how_do_i_go_about_investigating_this

Throw in that some of us also visit sites like calculatedrisk.. and you would have realized that this site might end up being toxic to you. You were given a ‘pass’ the first time.. the piggs didn’t unmask you. Repeat offenders tend to get unmasked.

[ucodegen]

[[email protected]].[/quote]
It is interesting how the ‘quote’ operator is coming up with this mish-mash. I was expecting something like:

Bill YourFhaGuru.com
.

Maybe it is that you are trying to put an Email address in your name and there is a spam harvester block on this site, that makes it harder for web-crawlers to harvest Email addresses for spamming. Notice that the ‘@’ is done as an image.

From your response here
I would have to ask: “Cat got your tongue? Or maybe briansd1 got your tongue?”

We practice our debating skills on each other here.. and in the process learn to find supporting data within minutes. Bill-so-called-FHA-guru, if you weren’t so busy trying to spam blog sites to further your mortgage broker business, you would have realized that this site might be a bit dangerous to spam. The ‘piggs’ have uncovered several people behind masks, more recently:

http://piggington.com/how_do_i_go_about_investigating_this

Throw in that some of us also visit sites like calculatedrisk.. and you would have realized that this site might end up being toxic to you. You were given a ‘pass’ the first time.. the piggs didn’t unmask you. Repeat offenders tend to get unmasked.

[ucodegen]

[[email protected]].[/quote]
It is interesting how the ‘quote’ operator is coming up with this mish-mash. I was expecting something like:

Bill YourFhaGuru.com
.

Maybe it is that you are trying to put an Email address in your name and there is a spam harvester block on this site, that makes it harder for web-crawlers to harvest Email addresses for spamming. Notice that the ‘@’ is done as an image.

From your response here
I would have to ask: “Cat got your tongue? Or maybe briansd1 got your tongue?”

We practice our debating skills on each other here.. and in the process learn to find supporting data within minutes. Bill-so-called-FHA-guru, if you weren’t so busy trying to spam blog sites to further your mortgage broker business, you would have realized that this site might be a bit dangerous to spam. The ‘piggs’ have uncovered several people behind masks, more recently:

http://piggington.com/how_do_i_go_about_investigating_this

Throw in that some of us also visit sites like calculatedrisk.. and you would have realized that this site might end up being toxic to you. You were given a ‘pass’ the first time.. the piggs didn’t unmask you. Repeat offenders tend to get unmasked.

[ucodegen]

[[email protected]].[/quote]
It is interesting how the ‘quote’ operator is coming up with this mish-mash. I was expecting something like:

Bill YourFhaGuru.com
.

Maybe it is that you are trying to put an Email address in your name and there is a spam harvester block on this site, that makes it harder for web-crawlers to harvest Email addresses for spamming. Notice that the ‘@’ is done as an image.

From your response here
I would have to ask: “Cat got your tongue? Or maybe briansd1 got your tongue?”

We practice our debating skills on each other here.. and in the process learn to find supporting data within minutes. Bill-so-called-FHA-guru, if you weren’t so busy trying to spam blog sites to further your mortgage broker business, you would have realized that this site might be a bit dangerous to spam. The ‘piggs’ have uncovered several people behind masks, more recently:

http://piggington.com/how_do_i_go_about_investigating_this

Throw in that some of us also visit sites like calculatedrisk.. and you would have realized that this site might end up being toxic to you. You were given a ‘pass’ the first time.. the piggs didn’t unmask you. Repeat offenders tend to get unmasked.

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=ucodegen]
Maybe it is that you are trying to put an Email address in your name and there is a spam harvester block on this site, that makes it harder for web-crawlers to harvest Email addresses for spamming. [/quote]

Correct. The quote mechanism doesn’t appear to deal well with the de-spammed addresses in usernames.

As for Bill… what can I say. I find his posts hilarious — I mean, to come here and use the “throwing your money away on rent” line is downright comical.

Rich

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=ucodegen]
Maybe it is that you are trying to put an Email address in your name and there is a spam harvester block on this site, that makes it harder for web-crawlers to harvest Email addresses for spamming. [/quote]

Correct. The quote mechanism doesn’t appear to deal well with the de-spammed addresses in usernames.

As for Bill… what can I say. I find his posts hilarious — I mean, to come here and use the “throwing your money away on rent” line is downright comical.

Rich

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=ucodegen]
Maybe it is that you are trying to put an Email address in your name and there is a spam harvester block on this site, that makes it harder for web-crawlers to harvest Email addresses for spamming. [/quote]

Correct. The quote mechanism doesn’t appear to deal well with the de-spammed addresses in usernames.

As for Bill… what can I say. I find his posts hilarious — I mean, to come here and use the “throwing your money away on rent” line is downright comical.

Rich

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=ucodegen]
Maybe it is that you are trying to put an Email address in your name and there is a spam harvester block on this site, that makes it harder for web-crawlers to harvest Email addresses for spamming. [/quote]

Correct. The quote mechanism doesn’t appear to deal well with the de-spammed addresses in usernames.

As for Bill… what can I say. I find his posts hilarious — I mean, to come here and use the “throwing your money away on rent” line is downright comical.

Rich

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=ucodegen]
Maybe it is that you are trying to put an Email address in your name and there is a spam harvester block on this site, that makes it harder for web-crawlers to harvest Email addresses for spamming. [/quote]

Correct. The quote mechanism doesn’t appear to deal well with the de-spammed addresses in usernames.

As for Bill… what can I say. I find his posts hilarious — I mean, to come here and use the “throwing your money away on rent” line is downright comical.

Rich

[scaredyclassic]

on reflection it is kind of comical. it was a profoundly, beautifully, ironically ill-suited pitch. Not sure what the humorous anology would be (not quite refrigerators to an eskimo, but like that). Now I regret chasing him away so quickly. this would have been a lot more fun if we’d played along. There should be a Piggington Pact that if any such guru comes along in the future, that everyone should lay low, play along, and gradually turn on him. full on attack mode is inapprorpiate and less dramatic.

[scaredyclassic]

on reflection it is kind of comical. it was a profoundly, beautifully, ironically ill-suited pitch. Not sure what the humorous anology would be (not quite refrigerators to an eskimo, but like that). Now I regret chasing him away so quickly. this would have been a lot more fun if we’d played along. There should be a Piggington Pact that if any such guru comes along in the future, that everyone should lay low, play along, and gradually turn on him. full on attack mode is inapprorpiate and less dramatic.

[scaredyclassic]

on reflection it is kind of comical. it was a profoundly, beautifully, ironically ill-suited pitch. Not sure what the humorous anology would be (not quite refrigerators to an eskimo, but like that). Now I regret chasing him away so quickly. this would have been a lot more fun if we’d played along. There should be a Piggington Pact that if any such guru comes along in the future, that everyone should lay low, play along, and gradually turn on him. full on attack mode is inapprorpiate and less dramatic.

[scaredyclassic]

on reflection it is kind of comical. it was a profoundly, beautifully, ironically ill-suited pitch. Not sure what the humorous anology would be (not quite refrigerators to an eskimo, but like that). Now I regret chasing him away so quickly. this would have been a lot more fun if we’d played along. There should be a Piggington Pact that if any such guru comes along in the future, that everyone should lay low, play along, and gradually turn on him. full on attack mode is inapprorpiate and less dramatic.

[Author]

Posts