- This topic has 1,886 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by
Jazzman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 13, 2009 at 3:37 PM #445235August 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM #444461
poorgradstudent
ParticipantThis just came out today:
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/08/12-9“A new poll conducted by the Toronto-based Nanos Research points to overwhelming support — 86.2 percent — for strengthening public health care rather than expanding for-profit services.
“With more than 8 in 10 Canadians supporting public solutions to make public health care stronger, there is compelling evidence that Canadians across all demographics would prefer a public over a for-profit health care system,” said Nik Nanos, president of Nanos Research.”
I’m confused where the talking point came from that Canadians don’t like their health care system. I lived in canada for two months in grad school, and everyone I spoke to was either satisfied with their system, or indifferent (but glad they don’t have a system like the US). Average wait times to see a doctor without an appointment were a couple hours, with a few weeks to a month to see a specialist; not that different from wait times with out system.
Bottom line, given the choice of keeping their current system, or swapping with us and paying a little less taxes, Canadians for the most part would keep their system.
August 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM #444654poorgradstudent
ParticipantThis just came out today:
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/08/12-9“A new poll conducted by the Toronto-based Nanos Research points to overwhelming support — 86.2 percent — for strengthening public health care rather than expanding for-profit services.
“With more than 8 in 10 Canadians supporting public solutions to make public health care stronger, there is compelling evidence that Canadians across all demographics would prefer a public over a for-profit health care system,” said Nik Nanos, president of Nanos Research.”
I’m confused where the talking point came from that Canadians don’t like their health care system. I lived in canada for two months in grad school, and everyone I spoke to was either satisfied with their system, or indifferent (but glad they don’t have a system like the US). Average wait times to see a doctor without an appointment were a couple hours, with a few weeks to a month to see a specialist; not that different from wait times with out system.
Bottom line, given the choice of keeping their current system, or swapping with us and paying a little less taxes, Canadians for the most part would keep their system.
August 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM #444991poorgradstudent
ParticipantThis just came out today:
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/08/12-9“A new poll conducted by the Toronto-based Nanos Research points to overwhelming support — 86.2 percent — for strengthening public health care rather than expanding for-profit services.
“With more than 8 in 10 Canadians supporting public solutions to make public health care stronger, there is compelling evidence that Canadians across all demographics would prefer a public over a for-profit health care system,” said Nik Nanos, president of Nanos Research.”
I’m confused where the talking point came from that Canadians don’t like their health care system. I lived in canada for two months in grad school, and everyone I spoke to was either satisfied with their system, or indifferent (but glad they don’t have a system like the US). Average wait times to see a doctor without an appointment were a couple hours, with a few weeks to a month to see a specialist; not that different from wait times with out system.
Bottom line, given the choice of keeping their current system, or swapping with us and paying a little less taxes, Canadians for the most part would keep their system.
August 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM #445061poorgradstudent
ParticipantThis just came out today:
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/08/12-9“A new poll conducted by the Toronto-based Nanos Research points to overwhelming support — 86.2 percent — for strengthening public health care rather than expanding for-profit services.
“With more than 8 in 10 Canadians supporting public solutions to make public health care stronger, there is compelling evidence that Canadians across all demographics would prefer a public over a for-profit health care system,” said Nik Nanos, president of Nanos Research.”
I’m confused where the talking point came from that Canadians don’t like their health care system. I lived in canada for two months in grad school, and everyone I spoke to was either satisfied with their system, or indifferent (but glad they don’t have a system like the US). Average wait times to see a doctor without an appointment were a couple hours, with a few weeks to a month to see a specialist; not that different from wait times with out system.
Bottom line, given the choice of keeping their current system, or swapping with us and paying a little less taxes, Canadians for the most part would keep their system.
August 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM #445240poorgradstudent
ParticipantThis just came out today:
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/08/12-9“A new poll conducted by the Toronto-based Nanos Research points to overwhelming support — 86.2 percent — for strengthening public health care rather than expanding for-profit services.
“With more than 8 in 10 Canadians supporting public solutions to make public health care stronger, there is compelling evidence that Canadians across all demographics would prefer a public over a for-profit health care system,” said Nik Nanos, president of Nanos Research.”
I’m confused where the talking point came from that Canadians don’t like their health care system. I lived in canada for two months in grad school, and everyone I spoke to was either satisfied with their system, or indifferent (but glad they don’t have a system like the US). Average wait times to see a doctor without an appointment were a couple hours, with a few weeks to a month to see a specialist; not that different from wait times with out system.
Bottom line, given the choice of keeping their current system, or swapping with us and paying a little less taxes, Canadians for the most part would keep their system.
August 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM #444466Anonymous
GuestSadly, there’s more to the story about the woman from Oregon. Even though her doctor was able to get the drug she wanted donated to her, the treatment was not effective and she died from lung cancer only four months later.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQvVjvxJp8MAugust 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM #444659Anonymous
GuestSadly, there’s more to the story about the woman from Oregon. Even though her doctor was able to get the drug she wanted donated to her, the treatment was not effective and she died from lung cancer only four months later.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQvVjvxJp8MAugust 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM #444996Anonymous
GuestSadly, there’s more to the story about the woman from Oregon. Even though her doctor was able to get the drug she wanted donated to her, the treatment was not effective and she died from lung cancer only four months later.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQvVjvxJp8MAugust 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM #445066Anonymous
GuestSadly, there’s more to the story about the woman from Oregon. Even though her doctor was able to get the drug she wanted donated to her, the treatment was not effective and she died from lung cancer only four months later.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQvVjvxJp8MAugust 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM #445245Anonymous
GuestSadly, there’s more to the story about the woman from Oregon. Even though her doctor was able to get the drug she wanted donated to her, the treatment was not effective and she died from lung cancer only four months later.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQvVjvxJp8MAugust 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM #444471afx114
ParticipantZeit, there is already a thread dedicated to the camps. If you want to discuss them, post there. Here, I’ll even post a link for you in case you’re too lazy to find it yourself: http://piggington.com/don039t_worry_these_will_only_be_used_in_an_emergency
This is a thread about healthcare — no need to try and change the subject just because you don’t have anything constructive to bring to the table. When you do that you make yourself a perfect example of why the opposition is doing nothing but poisoning the discourse with irrelevant blabbering.
August 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM #444664afx114
ParticipantZeit, there is already a thread dedicated to the camps. If you want to discuss them, post there. Here, I’ll even post a link for you in case you’re too lazy to find it yourself: http://piggington.com/don039t_worry_these_will_only_be_used_in_an_emergency
This is a thread about healthcare — no need to try and change the subject just because you don’t have anything constructive to bring to the table. When you do that you make yourself a perfect example of why the opposition is doing nothing but poisoning the discourse with irrelevant blabbering.
August 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM #445001afx114
ParticipantZeit, there is already a thread dedicated to the camps. If you want to discuss them, post there. Here, I’ll even post a link for you in case you’re too lazy to find it yourself: http://piggington.com/don039t_worry_these_will_only_be_used_in_an_emergency
This is a thread about healthcare — no need to try and change the subject just because you don’t have anything constructive to bring to the table. When you do that you make yourself a perfect example of why the opposition is doing nothing but poisoning the discourse with irrelevant blabbering.
August 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM #445071afx114
ParticipantZeit, there is already a thread dedicated to the camps. If you want to discuss them, post there. Here, I’ll even post a link for you in case you’re too lazy to find it yourself: http://piggington.com/don039t_worry_these_will_only_be_used_in_an_emergency
This is a thread about healthcare — no need to try and change the subject just because you don’t have anything constructive to bring to the table. When you do that you make yourself a perfect example of why the opposition is doing nothing but poisoning the discourse with irrelevant blabbering.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
