- This topic has 1,886 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by Jazzman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 15, 2009 at 12:31 AM #457476September 15, 2009 at 7:02 AM #456696surveyorParticipant
oversimplificatiousness
Unfortunately CA the human body is much more different than an airplane. A model of a plane is built the same way. There are minute differences, but if there is a design flaw or some other issue, it is generally repeatable.
Not only are most human beings very different on an individual basis, but their behavior is very difficult to anticipate and to model in the first place. There are an infinite amount of variations that a doctor has to be able to account for.
There is just no comparison.
September 15, 2009 at 7:02 AM #456889surveyorParticipantoversimplificatiousness
Unfortunately CA the human body is much more different than an airplane. A model of a plane is built the same way. There are minute differences, but if there is a design flaw or some other issue, it is generally repeatable.
Not only are most human beings very different on an individual basis, but their behavior is very difficult to anticipate and to model in the first place. There are an infinite amount of variations that a doctor has to be able to account for.
There is just no comparison.
September 15, 2009 at 7:02 AM #457228surveyorParticipantoversimplificatiousness
Unfortunately CA the human body is much more different than an airplane. A model of a plane is built the same way. There are minute differences, but if there is a design flaw or some other issue, it is generally repeatable.
Not only are most human beings very different on an individual basis, but their behavior is very difficult to anticipate and to model in the first place. There are an infinite amount of variations that a doctor has to be able to account for.
There is just no comparison.
September 15, 2009 at 7:02 AM #457302surveyorParticipantoversimplificatiousness
Unfortunately CA the human body is much more different than an airplane. A model of a plane is built the same way. There are minute differences, but if there is a design flaw or some other issue, it is generally repeatable.
Not only are most human beings very different on an individual basis, but their behavior is very difficult to anticipate and to model in the first place. There are an infinite amount of variations that a doctor has to be able to account for.
There is just no comparison.
September 15, 2009 at 7:02 AM #457496surveyorParticipantoversimplificatiousness
Unfortunately CA the human body is much more different than an airplane. A model of a plane is built the same way. There are minute differences, but if there is a design flaw or some other issue, it is generally repeatable.
Not only are most human beings very different on an individual basis, but their behavior is very difficult to anticipate and to model in the first place. There are an infinite amount of variations that a doctor has to be able to account for.
There is just no comparison.
September 15, 2009 at 7:51 AM #456706blahblahblahParticipantAfter all, why can they build and maintain large aircraft (among other things) that have a very miniscule failure rate, but for some reason, we can’t manage to do that with healthcare?
Because there is someone on the planet somewhere that can tell you exactly how anything on an airplane works, why it was designed that way, and how to fix it. Not so much for people.
I love the way people get distracted on tort reform when they talk about the medical system. It’s obvious where all the money is going — to the insurance companies! But hey let’s ignore that and just focus on something that is 1-2% of the overall cost instead. This place is f***ing hopeless, nothing will ever change here because people are just too f***ing stupid.
But hey at least the weather’s nice here in SD! Gonna be a good one today I think π
September 15, 2009 at 7:51 AM #456899blahblahblahParticipantAfter all, why can they build and maintain large aircraft (among other things) that have a very miniscule failure rate, but for some reason, we can’t manage to do that with healthcare?
Because there is someone on the planet somewhere that can tell you exactly how anything on an airplane works, why it was designed that way, and how to fix it. Not so much for people.
I love the way people get distracted on tort reform when they talk about the medical system. It’s obvious where all the money is going — to the insurance companies! But hey let’s ignore that and just focus on something that is 1-2% of the overall cost instead. This place is f***ing hopeless, nothing will ever change here because people are just too f***ing stupid.
But hey at least the weather’s nice here in SD! Gonna be a good one today I think π
September 15, 2009 at 7:51 AM #457238blahblahblahParticipantAfter all, why can they build and maintain large aircraft (among other things) that have a very miniscule failure rate, but for some reason, we can’t manage to do that with healthcare?
Because there is someone on the planet somewhere that can tell you exactly how anything on an airplane works, why it was designed that way, and how to fix it. Not so much for people.
I love the way people get distracted on tort reform when they talk about the medical system. It’s obvious where all the money is going — to the insurance companies! But hey let’s ignore that and just focus on something that is 1-2% of the overall cost instead. This place is f***ing hopeless, nothing will ever change here because people are just too f***ing stupid.
But hey at least the weather’s nice here in SD! Gonna be a good one today I think π
September 15, 2009 at 7:51 AM #457312blahblahblahParticipantAfter all, why can they build and maintain large aircraft (among other things) that have a very miniscule failure rate, but for some reason, we can’t manage to do that with healthcare?
Because there is someone on the planet somewhere that can tell you exactly how anything on an airplane works, why it was designed that way, and how to fix it. Not so much for people.
I love the way people get distracted on tort reform when they talk about the medical system. It’s obvious where all the money is going — to the insurance companies! But hey let’s ignore that and just focus on something that is 1-2% of the overall cost instead. This place is f***ing hopeless, nothing will ever change here because people are just too f***ing stupid.
But hey at least the weather’s nice here in SD! Gonna be a good one today I think π
September 15, 2009 at 7:51 AM #457506blahblahblahParticipantAfter all, why can they build and maintain large aircraft (among other things) that have a very miniscule failure rate, but for some reason, we can’t manage to do that with healthcare?
Because there is someone on the planet somewhere that can tell you exactly how anything on an airplane works, why it was designed that way, and how to fix it. Not so much for people.
I love the way people get distracted on tort reform when they talk about the medical system. It’s obvious where all the money is going — to the insurance companies! But hey let’s ignore that and just focus on something that is 1-2% of the overall cost instead. This place is f***ing hopeless, nothing will ever change here because people are just too f***ing stupid.
But hey at least the weather’s nice here in SD! Gonna be a good one today I think π
September 15, 2009 at 8:14 AM #456725ucodegenParticipantAmerican Red Cross was selling tainted Blood and factor 7
for 3 years during the Aids crisis. Until they came up with a
fast test, they just accepted contaminated blod.The problem was that the French system was still doing it after the tests were available. The use of AIDS tainted blood was effectively done ‘knowingly’ vs ‘unknowingly’ because a test was not available. There is a big difference between the two. That is why the criminal prosecution. Look at the timescale.. three years vs over 10 years.
September 15, 2009 at 8:14 AM #456919ucodegenParticipantAmerican Red Cross was selling tainted Blood and factor 7
for 3 years during the Aids crisis. Until they came up with a
fast test, they just accepted contaminated blod.The problem was that the French system was still doing it after the tests were available. The use of AIDS tainted blood was effectively done ‘knowingly’ vs ‘unknowingly’ because a test was not available. There is a big difference between the two. That is why the criminal prosecution. Look at the timescale.. three years vs over 10 years.
September 15, 2009 at 8:14 AM #457258ucodegenParticipantAmerican Red Cross was selling tainted Blood and factor 7
for 3 years during the Aids crisis. Until they came up with a
fast test, they just accepted contaminated blod.The problem was that the French system was still doing it after the tests were available. The use of AIDS tainted blood was effectively done ‘knowingly’ vs ‘unknowingly’ because a test was not available. There is a big difference between the two. That is why the criminal prosecution. Look at the timescale.. three years vs over 10 years.
September 15, 2009 at 8:14 AM #457332ucodegenParticipantAmerican Red Cross was selling tainted Blood and factor 7
for 3 years during the Aids crisis. Until they came up with a
fast test, they just accepted contaminated blod.The problem was that the French system was still doing it after the tests were available. The use of AIDS tainted blood was effectively done ‘knowingly’ vs ‘unknowingly’ because a test was not available. There is a big difference between the two. That is why the criminal prosecution. Look at the timescale.. three years vs over 10 years.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.