- This topic has 1,886 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by Jazzman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 8, 2009 at 11:42 AM #454999September 8, 2009 at 1:21 PM #454292Allan from FallbrookParticipant
[quote=Zeitgeist]Allan,
You got that right about the sleaze factor and the pols. A lot of them should be right there with Cunningham behind bars! Hey, did you hear Obama use the G word in his talk to the school kids? Does that mean forget about the separation of church and state? God is back?[/quote]
Zeit: I think so! Obama and the Big G (as we mackerel snapping Catholics call him) are tight. Or, so I’ve heard.
It’s interesting for a Lefty to be so unabashedly religious. Not spiritual, religious. Kidding aside, his support for someone like Van Jones, who is a former communist, and his left wing credentials, make him an unlikely adherent to religiosity. Of course, knowing Obama, it’s just another stage prop. Like grandma. Or Bill Ayers.
September 8, 2009 at 1:21 PM #454486Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Zeitgeist]Allan,
You got that right about the sleaze factor and the pols. A lot of them should be right there with Cunningham behind bars! Hey, did you hear Obama use the G word in his talk to the school kids? Does that mean forget about the separation of church and state? God is back?[/quote]
Zeit: I think so! Obama and the Big G (as we mackerel snapping Catholics call him) are tight. Or, so I’ve heard.
It’s interesting for a Lefty to be so unabashedly religious. Not spiritual, religious. Kidding aside, his support for someone like Van Jones, who is a former communist, and his left wing credentials, make him an unlikely adherent to religiosity. Of course, knowing Obama, it’s just another stage prop. Like grandma. Or Bill Ayers.
September 8, 2009 at 1:21 PM #454826Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Zeitgeist]Allan,
You got that right about the sleaze factor and the pols. A lot of them should be right there with Cunningham behind bars! Hey, did you hear Obama use the G word in his talk to the school kids? Does that mean forget about the separation of church and state? God is back?[/quote]
Zeit: I think so! Obama and the Big G (as we mackerel snapping Catholics call him) are tight. Or, so I’ve heard.
It’s interesting for a Lefty to be so unabashedly religious. Not spiritual, religious. Kidding aside, his support for someone like Van Jones, who is a former communist, and his left wing credentials, make him an unlikely adherent to religiosity. Of course, knowing Obama, it’s just another stage prop. Like grandma. Or Bill Ayers.
September 8, 2009 at 1:21 PM #454899Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Zeitgeist]Allan,
You got that right about the sleaze factor and the pols. A lot of them should be right there with Cunningham behind bars! Hey, did you hear Obama use the G word in his talk to the school kids? Does that mean forget about the separation of church and state? God is back?[/quote]
Zeit: I think so! Obama and the Big G (as we mackerel snapping Catholics call him) are tight. Or, so I’ve heard.
It’s interesting for a Lefty to be so unabashedly religious. Not spiritual, religious. Kidding aside, his support for someone like Van Jones, who is a former communist, and his left wing credentials, make him an unlikely adherent to religiosity. Of course, knowing Obama, it’s just another stage prop. Like grandma. Or Bill Ayers.
September 8, 2009 at 1:21 PM #455090Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Zeitgeist]Allan,
You got that right about the sleaze factor and the pols. A lot of them should be right there with Cunningham behind bars! Hey, did you hear Obama use the G word in his talk to the school kids? Does that mean forget about the separation of church and state? God is back?[/quote]
Zeit: I think so! Obama and the Big G (as we mackerel snapping Catholics call him) are tight. Or, so I’ve heard.
It’s interesting for a Lefty to be so unabashedly religious. Not spiritual, religious. Kidding aside, his support for someone like Van Jones, who is a former communist, and his left wing credentials, make him an unlikely adherent to religiosity. Of course, knowing Obama, it’s just another stage prop. Like grandma. Or Bill Ayers.
September 8, 2009 at 3:15 PM #454357ZeitgeistParticipantOverall, I thought the talk he gave was positive and I hope they listened to what he said.
September 8, 2009 at 3:15 PM #454550ZeitgeistParticipantOverall, I thought the talk he gave was positive and I hope they listened to what he said.
September 8, 2009 at 3:15 PM #454892ZeitgeistParticipantOverall, I thought the talk he gave was positive and I hope they listened to what he said.
September 8, 2009 at 3:15 PM #454963ZeitgeistParticipantOverall, I thought the talk he gave was positive and I hope they listened to what he said.
September 8, 2009 at 3:15 PM #455156ZeitgeistParticipantOverall, I thought the talk he gave was positive and I hope they listened to what he said.
September 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM #456049pepsiParticipant[quote=sd_matt]I was listening Dennis Prager interview a doctor. To shorten what the doc said; You are more likely to lose your savings here in the USA and more likely to die from a major illness in the more socialized systems.
I asked a nurse practitioner if she agreed with that assessment and she said yes.
Any docs here in the house? Do you agree or disagree?
[/quote]
I would agree to this one:
You are likely to lose your saving (first) in USA , and to die (first) from a major illness in other system.
September 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM #456241pepsiParticipant[quote=sd_matt]I was listening Dennis Prager interview a doctor. To shorten what the doc said; You are more likely to lose your savings here in the USA and more likely to die from a major illness in the more socialized systems.
I asked a nurse practitioner if she agreed with that assessment and she said yes.
Any docs here in the house? Do you agree or disagree?
[/quote]
I would agree to this one:
You are likely to lose your saving (first) in USA , and to die (first) from a major illness in other system.
September 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM #456579pepsiParticipant[quote=sd_matt]I was listening Dennis Prager interview a doctor. To shorten what the doc said; You are more likely to lose your savings here in the USA and more likely to die from a major illness in the more socialized systems.
I asked a nurse practitioner if she agreed with that assessment and she said yes.
Any docs here in the house? Do you agree or disagree?
[/quote]
I would agree to this one:
You are likely to lose your saving (first) in USA , and to die (first) from a major illness in other system.
September 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM #456652pepsiParticipant[quote=sd_matt]I was listening Dennis Prager interview a doctor. To shorten what the doc said; You are more likely to lose your savings here in the USA and more likely to die from a major illness in the more socialized systems.
I asked a nurse practitioner if she agreed with that assessment and she said yes.
Any docs here in the house? Do you agree or disagree?
[/quote]
I would agree to this one:
You are likely to lose your saving (first) in USA , and to die (first) from a major illness in other system.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.