- This topic has 550 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by eccen in esc.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 7, 2008 at 9:40 PM #131715January 7, 2008 at 9:44 PM #131438Allan from FallbrookParticipant
drunkle: Just saw your edits 1 and 2.
1. Yes, the standards are different depending on your skin. No argument from me on that one.
2. Yes, the standards are different depending on your wealth and/or social standing. Yep, I also know it is not right, and would accept any just criticism.
Not to be a wise-ass, but isn’t that what you and I are doing right now?
January 7, 2008 at 9:44 PM #131620Allan from FallbrookParticipantdrunkle: Just saw your edits 1 and 2.
1. Yes, the standards are different depending on your skin. No argument from me on that one.
2. Yes, the standards are different depending on your wealth and/or social standing. Yep, I also know it is not right, and would accept any just criticism.
Not to be a wise-ass, but isn’t that what you and I are doing right now?
January 7, 2008 at 9:44 PM #131627Allan from FallbrookParticipantdrunkle: Just saw your edits 1 and 2.
1. Yes, the standards are different depending on your skin. No argument from me on that one.
2. Yes, the standards are different depending on your wealth and/or social standing. Yep, I also know it is not right, and would accept any just criticism.
Not to be a wise-ass, but isn’t that what you and I are doing right now?
January 7, 2008 at 9:44 PM #131689Allan from FallbrookParticipantdrunkle: Just saw your edits 1 and 2.
1. Yes, the standards are different depending on your skin. No argument from me on that one.
2. Yes, the standards are different depending on your wealth and/or social standing. Yep, I also know it is not right, and would accept any just criticism.
Not to be a wise-ass, but isn’t that what you and I are doing right now?
January 7, 2008 at 9:44 PM #131725Allan from FallbrookParticipantdrunkle: Just saw your edits 1 and 2.
1. Yes, the standards are different depending on your skin. No argument from me on that one.
2. Yes, the standards are different depending on your wealth and/or social standing. Yep, I also know it is not right, and would accept any just criticism.
Not to be a wise-ass, but isn’t that what you and I are doing right now?
January 7, 2008 at 9:48 PM #131452drunkleParticipantallan:
i know you’re not stupid. that’s why i’m posting and arguing with you rather than gold.
the insinuation is important; turning your other cheek doesn’t work. nonsense should be addressed and taken head on. sometimes i dont. sometimes i’m lazy. but not today.
“white guilt” is a whole study unto itself. i’ll let that lie for now. i just got lazy again. suffice for now, whites are not the only ones who can see injustice, blacks are not the only ones that suffer injustice.
January 7, 2008 at 9:48 PM #131633drunkleParticipantallan:
i know you’re not stupid. that’s why i’m posting and arguing with you rather than gold.
the insinuation is important; turning your other cheek doesn’t work. nonsense should be addressed and taken head on. sometimes i dont. sometimes i’m lazy. but not today.
“white guilt” is a whole study unto itself. i’ll let that lie for now. i just got lazy again. suffice for now, whites are not the only ones who can see injustice, blacks are not the only ones that suffer injustice.
January 7, 2008 at 9:48 PM #131641drunkleParticipantallan:
i know you’re not stupid. that’s why i’m posting and arguing with you rather than gold.
the insinuation is important; turning your other cheek doesn’t work. nonsense should be addressed and taken head on. sometimes i dont. sometimes i’m lazy. but not today.
“white guilt” is a whole study unto itself. i’ll let that lie for now. i just got lazy again. suffice for now, whites are not the only ones who can see injustice, blacks are not the only ones that suffer injustice.
January 7, 2008 at 9:48 PM #131703drunkleParticipantallan:
i know you’re not stupid. that’s why i’m posting and arguing with you rather than gold.
the insinuation is important; turning your other cheek doesn’t work. nonsense should be addressed and taken head on. sometimes i dont. sometimes i’m lazy. but not today.
“white guilt” is a whole study unto itself. i’ll let that lie for now. i just got lazy again. suffice for now, whites are not the only ones who can see injustice, blacks are not the only ones that suffer injustice.
January 7, 2008 at 9:48 PM #131740drunkleParticipantallan:
i know you’re not stupid. that’s why i’m posting and arguing with you rather than gold.
the insinuation is important; turning your other cheek doesn’t work. nonsense should be addressed and taken head on. sometimes i dont. sometimes i’m lazy. but not today.
“white guilt” is a whole study unto itself. i’ll let that lie for now. i just got lazy again. suffice for now, whites are not the only ones who can see injustice, blacks are not the only ones that suffer injustice.
January 7, 2008 at 9:59 PM #131466drunkleParticipant“Not to be a wise-ass, but isn’t that what you and I are doing right now?”
what do you mean?
January 7, 2008 at 9:59 PM #131650drunkleParticipant“Not to be a wise-ass, but isn’t that what you and I are doing right now?”
what do you mean?
January 7, 2008 at 9:59 PM #131656drunkleParticipant“Not to be a wise-ass, but isn’t that what you and I are doing right now?”
what do you mean?
January 7, 2008 at 9:59 PM #131717drunkleParticipant“Not to be a wise-ass, but isn’t that what you and I are doing right now?”
what do you mean?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.