Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Obama Goes All Out For Dirty Banker Deal
- This topic has 125 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by
Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 26, 2011 at 11:19 AM #726045August 26, 2011 at 12:23 PM #724863
DomoArigato
Participant[quote=ucodegen]
Considering that our current national debt stands at $14 trillion (total for all presidents past and present), how do you come up with $16 trillion being given to the banks? Any facts or referring documents to back up your contention? Do these numbers factor in money that was paid back to the fed?[/quote]http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3
The Federal Reserve conducted a massive, $16 trillion stealth bailout of the banks while everyone else was left to fend for themselves. No we know why Government Sachs employees are able to give themselves average salaries of $700,000 per year. It’s because those salaries are actually paid by taxpayers.
To put the size of the bailouts in perspective, JPM received a $390 billion bailout. That is almost 3 times their current market cap. Could you imagine if all homeowners received a bailout that equaled three times the cost of their house? There would be so many cries of socialism from the hypocrites in the criminal bankster class that you wouldn’t be able to hear yourself think.
August 26, 2011 at 12:23 PM #724953Participant[quote=ucodegen]
Considering that our current national debt stands at $14 trillion (total for all presidents past and present), how do you come up with $16 trillion being given to the banks? Any facts or referring documents to back up your contention? Do these numbers factor in money that was paid back to the fed?[/quote]http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3
The Federal Reserve conducted a massive, $16 trillion stealth bailout of the banks while everyone else was left to fend for themselves. No we know why Government Sachs employees are able to give themselves average salaries of $700,000 per year. It’s because those salaries are actually paid by taxpayers.
To put the size of the bailouts in perspective, JPM received a $390 billion bailout. That is almost 3 times their current market cap. Could you imagine if all homeowners received a bailout that equaled three times the cost of their house? There would be so many cries of socialism from the hypocrites in the criminal bankster class that you wouldn’t be able to hear yourself think.
August 26, 2011 at 12:23 PM #725550Participant[quote=ucodegen]
Considering that our current national debt stands at $14 trillion (total for all presidents past and present), how do you come up with $16 trillion being given to the banks? Any facts or referring documents to back up your contention? Do these numbers factor in money that was paid back to the fed?[/quote]http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3
The Federal Reserve conducted a massive, $16 trillion stealth bailout of the banks while everyone else was left to fend for themselves. No we know why Government Sachs employees are able to give themselves average salaries of $700,000 per year. It’s because those salaries are actually paid by taxpayers.
To put the size of the bailouts in perspective, JPM received a $390 billion bailout. That is almost 3 times their current market cap. Could you imagine if all homeowners received a bailout that equaled three times the cost of their house? There would be so many cries of socialism from the hypocrites in the criminal bankster class that you wouldn’t be able to hear yourself think.
August 26, 2011 at 12:23 PM #725705Participant[quote=ucodegen]
Considering that our current national debt stands at $14 trillion (total for all presidents past and present), how do you come up with $16 trillion being given to the banks? Any facts or referring documents to back up your contention? Do these numbers factor in money that was paid back to the fed?[/quote]http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3
The Federal Reserve conducted a massive, $16 trillion stealth bailout of the banks while everyone else was left to fend for themselves. No we know why Government Sachs employees are able to give themselves average salaries of $700,000 per year. It’s because those salaries are actually paid by taxpayers.
To put the size of the bailouts in perspective, JPM received a $390 billion bailout. That is almost 3 times their current market cap. Could you imagine if all homeowners received a bailout that equaled three times the cost of their house? There would be so many cries of socialism from the hypocrites in the criminal bankster class that you wouldn’t be able to hear yourself think.
August 26, 2011 at 12:23 PM #726070Participant[quote=ucodegen]
Considering that our current national debt stands at $14 trillion (total for all presidents past and present), how do you come up with $16 trillion being given to the banks? Any facts or referring documents to back up your contention? Do these numbers factor in money that was paid back to the fed?[/quote]http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3
The Federal Reserve conducted a massive, $16 trillion stealth bailout of the banks while everyone else was left to fend for themselves. No we know why Government Sachs employees are able to give themselves average salaries of $700,000 per year. It’s because those salaries are actually paid by taxpayers.
To put the size of the bailouts in perspective, JPM received a $390 billion bailout. That is almost 3 times their current market cap. Could you imagine if all homeowners received a bailout that equaled three times the cost of their house? There would be so many cries of socialism from the hypocrites in the criminal bankster class that you wouldn’t be able to hear yourself think.
August 26, 2011 at 1:02 PM #724878Anonymous
GuestAllan: If Buffett is so corrupt, then why is he trying to raise his own taxes and giving all his money to charity?
August 26, 2011 at 1:02 PM #724968GuestAllan: If Buffett is so corrupt, then why is he trying to raise his own taxes and giving all his money to charity?
August 26, 2011 at 1:02 PM #725565GuestAllan: If Buffett is so corrupt, then why is he trying to raise his own taxes and giving all his money to charity?
August 26, 2011 at 1:02 PM #725720GuestAllan: If Buffett is so corrupt, then why is he trying to raise his own taxes and giving all his money to charity?
August 26, 2011 at 1:02 PM #726085GuestAllan: If Buffett is so corrupt, then why is he trying to raise his own taxes and giving all his money to charity?
August 26, 2011 at 1:09 PM #724888jstoesz
ParticipantBecause he benefits if the federal government’s coffers are full of money to redistribute to his crony companies.
His investment portfolio reads like a who’s who of top government cheese gobblers.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/44271446
Why do public employees lobby for higher taxes? Surely they will be paying more too?
August 26, 2011 at 1:09 PM #724978ParticipantBecause he benefits if the federal government’s coffers are full of money to redistribute to his crony companies.
His investment portfolio reads like a who’s who of top government cheese gobblers.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/44271446
Why do public employees lobby for higher taxes? Surely they will be paying more too?
August 26, 2011 at 1:09 PM #725576ParticipantBecause he benefits if the federal government’s coffers are full of money to redistribute to his crony companies.
His investment portfolio reads like a who’s who of top government cheese gobblers.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/44271446
Why do public employees lobby for higher taxes? Surely they will be paying more too?
August 26, 2011 at 1:09 PM #725730ParticipantBecause he benefits if the federal government’s coffers are full of money to redistribute to his crony companies.
His investment portfolio reads like a who’s who of top government cheese gobblers.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/44271446
Why do public employees lobby for higher taxes? Surely they will be paying more too?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.