- This topic has 1,260 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by ucodegen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 10, 2009 at 12:25 AM #467519October 10, 2009 at 1:21 AM #466738paramountParticipant
This is the best commentary on this award I’ve heard yet:
October 10, 2009 at 1:21 AM #466921paramountParticipantThis is the best commentary on this award I’ve heard yet:
October 10, 2009 at 1:21 AM #467268paramountParticipantThis is the best commentary on this award I’ve heard yet:
October 10, 2009 at 1:21 AM #467338paramountParticipantThis is the best commentary on this award I’ve heard yet:
October 10, 2009 at 1:21 AM #467543paramountParticipantThis is the best commentary on this award I’ve heard yet:
October 10, 2009 at 6:41 AM #466811ArrayaParticipant[quote=paramount]This is the best commentary on this award I’ve heard yet:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbcDk-bNoc8%5B/quote%5D
RP talks sense on Iran too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUqrdDtC9wA&feature=player_embedded
October 10, 2009 at 6:41 AM #466995ArrayaParticipant[quote=paramount]This is the best commentary on this award I’ve heard yet:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbcDk-bNoc8%5B/quote%5D
RP talks sense on Iran too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUqrdDtC9wA&feature=player_embedded
October 10, 2009 at 6:41 AM #467341ArrayaParticipant[quote=paramount]This is the best commentary on this award I’ve heard yet:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbcDk-bNoc8%5B/quote%5D
RP talks sense on Iran too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUqrdDtC9wA&feature=player_embedded
October 10, 2009 at 6:41 AM #467411ArrayaParticipant[quote=paramount]This is the best commentary on this award I’ve heard yet:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbcDk-bNoc8%5B/quote%5D
RP talks sense on Iran too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUqrdDtC9wA&feature=player_embedded
October 10, 2009 at 6:41 AM #467617ArrayaParticipant[quote=paramount]This is the best commentary on this award I’ve heard yet:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbcDk-bNoc8%5B/quote%5D
RP talks sense on Iran too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUqrdDtC9wA&feature=player_embedded
October 10, 2009 at 6:56 AM #466816NotCrankyParticipantI’ll be honest I don’t know what to think about this apparent encouragement to Obama to Be peaceful. I thought it was serious manipulation toward that goal yesterday. But than I think isn’t europes fate(energy) so inextricably tied to Western Hegemony in the middle east? Isn’t it also obvious that there is some potential interference(and lots more petroleum )in Iran ? Maybe it was a big political head fake… or an attempt at working a better deal on the spoils of future violence then they got with Bush. Probably?
October 10, 2009 at 6:56 AM #467000NotCrankyParticipantI’ll be honest I don’t know what to think about this apparent encouragement to Obama to Be peaceful. I thought it was serious manipulation toward that goal yesterday. But than I think isn’t europes fate(energy) so inextricably tied to Western Hegemony in the middle east? Isn’t it also obvious that there is some potential interference(and lots more petroleum )in Iran ? Maybe it was a big political head fake… or an attempt at working a better deal on the spoils of future violence then they got with Bush. Probably?
October 10, 2009 at 6:56 AM #467347NotCrankyParticipantI’ll be honest I don’t know what to think about this apparent encouragement to Obama to Be peaceful. I thought it was serious manipulation toward that goal yesterday. But than I think isn’t europes fate(energy) so inextricably tied to Western Hegemony in the middle east? Isn’t it also obvious that there is some potential interference(and lots more petroleum )in Iran ? Maybe it was a big political head fake… or an attempt at working a better deal on the spoils of future violence then they got with Bush. Probably?
October 10, 2009 at 6:56 AM #467416NotCrankyParticipantI’ll be honest I don’t know what to think about this apparent encouragement to Obama to Be peaceful. I thought it was serious manipulation toward that goal yesterday. But than I think isn’t europes fate(energy) so inextricably tied to Western Hegemony in the middle east? Isn’t it also obvious that there is some potential interference(and lots more petroleum )in Iran ? Maybe it was a big political head fake… or an attempt at working a better deal on the spoils of future violence then they got with Bush. Probably?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.