- This topic has 440 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
cr.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 25, 2009 at 11:10 AM #336055January 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM #335545
socrattt
Participant[quote=TheBreeze]
GITMO will only become an issue if someone released from there is able to launch a successful terrorist attack on the U.S. Otherwise, GITMO will be forgotten by 2012. If neither the U.S. nor U.S. interests are attacked between now and 2012, GITMO, Iraq, and even Afghanistan will likely be non-issues in 2012.
And if Obama is able to break Al Qaeda? You and Allan may be the only two people who vote Republican in 2012.
The Republicans may have to borrow the Army’s motto. But, instead of any army of one, it will be a party of one. LOL!
[/quote]The focus really won’t be Al-Qaida. We really don’t have time to worry about terrorists at this point, exactly my reasoning for leaving GITMO alone until we resolve our economic issues at home. Once we solve the economic threat we move to international eye sores, such as GITMO. Allan and I have both mentioned the 2nd in command in Yemen. There is proof he is back to the drawing board. We let these guys go and they will cause destruction. While we fight an economic war, they fight a religious war. Trust me, they will strike us when we are most vulnerable.
Obama will never break Al-Qaida. This is a group that is willing to give up there lives for 40 virgins. They have a different thought process and they are breeding as fast as the Chinese.
I won’t vote Repub in 2012, I will be running as an Independent!
January 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM #335875Participant[quote=TheBreeze]
GITMO will only become an issue if someone released from there is able to launch a successful terrorist attack on the U.S. Otherwise, GITMO will be forgotten by 2012. If neither the U.S. nor U.S. interests are attacked between now and 2012, GITMO, Iraq, and even Afghanistan will likely be non-issues in 2012.
And if Obama is able to break Al Qaeda? You and Allan may be the only two people who vote Republican in 2012.
The Republicans may have to borrow the Army’s motto. But, instead of any army of one, it will be a party of one. LOL!
[/quote]The focus really won’t be Al-Qaida. We really don’t have time to worry about terrorists at this point, exactly my reasoning for leaving GITMO alone until we resolve our economic issues at home. Once we solve the economic threat we move to international eye sores, such as GITMO. Allan and I have both mentioned the 2nd in command in Yemen. There is proof he is back to the drawing board. We let these guys go and they will cause destruction. While we fight an economic war, they fight a religious war. Trust me, they will strike us when we are most vulnerable.
Obama will never break Al-Qaida. This is a group that is willing to give up there lives for 40 virgins. They have a different thought process and they are breeding as fast as the Chinese.
I won’t vote Repub in 2012, I will be running as an Independent!
January 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM #335961Participant[quote=TheBreeze]
GITMO will only become an issue if someone released from there is able to launch a successful terrorist attack on the U.S. Otherwise, GITMO will be forgotten by 2012. If neither the U.S. nor U.S. interests are attacked between now and 2012, GITMO, Iraq, and even Afghanistan will likely be non-issues in 2012.
And if Obama is able to break Al Qaeda? You and Allan may be the only two people who vote Republican in 2012.
The Republicans may have to borrow the Army’s motto. But, instead of any army of one, it will be a party of one. LOL!
[/quote]The focus really won’t be Al-Qaida. We really don’t have time to worry about terrorists at this point, exactly my reasoning for leaving GITMO alone until we resolve our economic issues at home. Once we solve the economic threat we move to international eye sores, such as GITMO. Allan and I have both mentioned the 2nd in command in Yemen. There is proof he is back to the drawing board. We let these guys go and they will cause destruction. While we fight an economic war, they fight a religious war. Trust me, they will strike us when we are most vulnerable.
Obama will never break Al-Qaida. This is a group that is willing to give up there lives for 40 virgins. They have a different thought process and they are breeding as fast as the Chinese.
I won’t vote Repub in 2012, I will be running as an Independent!
January 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM #335989Participant[quote=TheBreeze]
GITMO will only become an issue if someone released from there is able to launch a successful terrorist attack on the U.S. Otherwise, GITMO will be forgotten by 2012. If neither the U.S. nor U.S. interests are attacked between now and 2012, GITMO, Iraq, and even Afghanistan will likely be non-issues in 2012.
And if Obama is able to break Al Qaeda? You and Allan may be the only two people who vote Republican in 2012.
The Republicans may have to borrow the Army’s motto. But, instead of any army of one, it will be a party of one. LOL!
[/quote]The focus really won’t be Al-Qaida. We really don’t have time to worry about terrorists at this point, exactly my reasoning for leaving GITMO alone until we resolve our economic issues at home. Once we solve the economic threat we move to international eye sores, such as GITMO. Allan and I have both mentioned the 2nd in command in Yemen. There is proof he is back to the drawing board. We let these guys go and they will cause destruction. While we fight an economic war, they fight a religious war. Trust me, they will strike us when we are most vulnerable.
Obama will never break Al-Qaida. This is a group that is willing to give up there lives for 40 virgins. They have a different thought process and they are breeding as fast as the Chinese.
I won’t vote Repub in 2012, I will be running as an Independent!
January 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM #336076Participant[quote=TheBreeze]
GITMO will only become an issue if someone released from there is able to launch a successful terrorist attack on the U.S. Otherwise, GITMO will be forgotten by 2012. If neither the U.S. nor U.S. interests are attacked between now and 2012, GITMO, Iraq, and even Afghanistan will likely be non-issues in 2012.
And if Obama is able to break Al Qaeda? You and Allan may be the only two people who vote Republican in 2012.
The Republicans may have to borrow the Army’s motto. But, instead of any army of one, it will be a party of one. LOL!
[/quote]The focus really won’t be Al-Qaida. We really don’t have time to worry about terrorists at this point, exactly my reasoning for leaving GITMO alone until we resolve our economic issues at home. Once we solve the economic threat we move to international eye sores, such as GITMO. Allan and I have both mentioned the 2nd in command in Yemen. There is proof he is back to the drawing board. We let these guys go and they will cause destruction. While we fight an economic war, they fight a religious war. Trust me, they will strike us when we are most vulnerable.
Obama will never break Al-Qaida. This is a group that is willing to give up there lives for 40 virgins. They have a different thought process and they are breeding as fast as the Chinese.
I won’t vote Repub in 2012, I will be running as an Independent!
January 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM #335550Arraya
ParticipantMore people die from peanut related allergies than terrorists. Maybe we need a war against peanuts.
January 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM #335880ParticipantMore people die from peanut related allergies than terrorists. Maybe we need a war against peanuts.
January 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM #335966ParticipantMore people die from peanut related allergies than terrorists. Maybe we need a war against peanuts.
January 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM #335994ParticipantMore people die from peanut related allergies than terrorists. Maybe we need a war against peanuts.
January 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM #336081ParticipantMore people die from peanut related allergies than terrorists. Maybe we need a war against peanuts.
January 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM #335562TheBreeze
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]you’re conveniently ignoring that NYT article about the Yemeni released from Gitmo who is now an al-Qaeda chief.
[/quote]Are you talking about this guy? This guy was released by Bush and Cheney:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hZfIcWnHqBz4kQR90lC_pXaHeW4Q
Surely you’re not going to try and blame Bush/Cheney’s release of a terrorist in 2007 on Obama? It just goes to show that GITMO didn’t always work that well even in the Bush/Cheney era.
January 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM #335892Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]you’re conveniently ignoring that NYT article about the Yemeni released from Gitmo who is now an al-Qaeda chief.
[/quote]Are you talking about this guy? This guy was released by Bush and Cheney:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hZfIcWnHqBz4kQR90lC_pXaHeW4Q
Surely you’re not going to try and blame Bush/Cheney’s release of a terrorist in 2007 on Obama? It just goes to show that GITMO didn’t always work that well even in the Bush/Cheney era.
January 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM #335977Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]you’re conveniently ignoring that NYT article about the Yemeni released from Gitmo who is now an al-Qaeda chief.
[/quote]Are you talking about this guy? This guy was released by Bush and Cheney:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hZfIcWnHqBz4kQR90lC_pXaHeW4Q
Surely you’re not going to try and blame Bush/Cheney’s release of a terrorist in 2007 on Obama? It just goes to show that GITMO didn’t always work that well even in the Bush/Cheney era.
January 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM #336005Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]you’re conveniently ignoring that NYT article about the Yemeni released from Gitmo who is now an al-Qaeda chief.
[/quote]Are you talking about this guy? This guy was released by Bush and Cheney:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hZfIcWnHqBz4kQR90lC_pXaHeW4Q
Surely you’re not going to try and blame Bush/Cheney’s release of a terrorist in 2007 on Obama? It just goes to show that GITMO didn’t always work that well even in the Bush/Cheney era.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.