Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › NY Appellate court overthrows MERS…
- This topic has 40 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by PCinSD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM #703076June 13, 2011 at 7:10 PM #703188patbParticipant
[quote=pabloesqobar]Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
Google is your friend.[/quote]
But at this point, they need leave to appeal
or they need a conflicting ruling from another department of the Appellate division.If i got it right, they have an appeal by right to the appellate division, they don’t have a appeal by right to the NY Court of Appeals.
Much as in Federal law. You can appeal a district court ruling to the appellate court, but the Supremes need to decide to take a case.
June 13, 2011 at 7:10 PM #704285patbParticipant[quote=pabloesqobar]Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
Google is your friend.[/quote]
But at this point, they need leave to appeal
or they need a conflicting ruling from another department of the Appellate division.If i got it right, they have an appeal by right to the appellate division, they don’t have a appeal by right to the NY Court of Appeals.
Much as in Federal law. You can appeal a district court ruling to the appellate court, but the Supremes need to decide to take a case.
June 13, 2011 at 7:10 PM #703091patbParticipant[quote=pabloesqobar]Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
Google is your friend.[/quote]
But at this point, they need leave to appeal
or they need a conflicting ruling from another department of the Appellate division.If i got it right, they have an appeal by right to the appellate division, they don’t have a appeal by right to the NY Court of Appeals.
Much as in Federal law. You can appeal a district court ruling to the appellate court, but the Supremes need to decide to take a case.
June 13, 2011 at 7:10 PM #703926patbParticipant[quote=pabloesqobar]Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
Google is your friend.[/quote]
But at this point, they need leave to appeal
or they need a conflicting ruling from another department of the Appellate division.If i got it right, they have an appeal by right to the appellate division, they don’t have a appeal by right to the NY Court of Appeals.
Much as in Federal law. You can appeal a district court ruling to the appellate court, but the Supremes need to decide to take a case.
June 13, 2011 at 7:10 PM #703778patbParticipant[quote=pabloesqobar]Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
Google is your friend.[/quote]
But at this point, they need leave to appeal
or they need a conflicting ruling from another department of the Appellate division.If i got it right, they have an appeal by right to the appellate division, they don’t have a appeal by right to the NY Court of Appeals.
Much as in Federal law. You can appeal a district court ruling to the appellate court, but the Supremes need to decide to take a case.
June 13, 2011 at 8:29 PM #703941PCinSDGuest[quote=patb][quote=pabloesqobar]Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
Google is your friend.[/quote]
But at this point, they need leave to appeal
or they need a conflicting ruling from another department of the Appellate division.If i got it right, they have an appeal by right to the appellate division, they don’t have a appeal by right to the NY Court of Appeals.
Much as in Federal law. You can appeal a district court ruling to the appellate court, but the Supremes need to decide to take a case.[/quote]
Yep, it’s discretionary, just like in CA and probably every other state. The odds of the Supreme Ct taking your appeal is slim. I may be jaded, but I think that lets the Court of Appeal make wrong decisions, not certify it for publication, knowing that it’s bad law and that it can’t/won’t get appealed.
June 13, 2011 at 8:29 PM #703106PCinSDGuest[quote=patb][quote=pabloesqobar]Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
Google is your friend.[/quote]
But at this point, they need leave to appeal
or they need a conflicting ruling from another department of the Appellate division.If i got it right, they have an appeal by right to the appellate division, they don’t have a appeal by right to the NY Court of Appeals.
Much as in Federal law. You can appeal a district court ruling to the appellate court, but the Supremes need to decide to take a case.[/quote]
Yep, it’s discretionary, just like in CA and probably every other state. The odds of the Supreme Ct taking your appeal is slim. I may be jaded, but I think that lets the Court of Appeal make wrong decisions, not certify it for publication, knowing that it’s bad law and that it can’t/won’t get appealed.
June 13, 2011 at 8:29 PM #703793PCinSDGuest[quote=patb][quote=pabloesqobar]Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
Google is your friend.[/quote]
But at this point, they need leave to appeal
or they need a conflicting ruling from another department of the Appellate division.If i got it right, they have an appeal by right to the appellate division, they don’t have a appeal by right to the NY Court of Appeals.
Much as in Federal law. You can appeal a district court ruling to the appellate court, but the Supremes need to decide to take a case.[/quote]
Yep, it’s discretionary, just like in CA and probably every other state. The odds of the Supreme Ct taking your appeal is slim. I may be jaded, but I think that lets the Court of Appeal make wrong decisions, not certify it for publication, knowing that it’s bad law and that it can’t/won’t get appealed.
June 13, 2011 at 8:29 PM #703203PCinSDGuest[quote=patb][quote=pabloesqobar]Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
Google is your friend.[/quote]
But at this point, they need leave to appeal
or they need a conflicting ruling from another department of the Appellate division.If i got it right, they have an appeal by right to the appellate division, they don’t have a appeal by right to the NY Court of Appeals.
Much as in Federal law. You can appeal a district court ruling to the appellate court, but the Supremes need to decide to take a case.[/quote]
Yep, it’s discretionary, just like in CA and probably every other state. The odds of the Supreme Ct taking your appeal is slim. I may be jaded, but I think that lets the Court of Appeal make wrong decisions, not certify it for publication, knowing that it’s bad law and that it can’t/won’t get appealed.
June 13, 2011 at 8:29 PM #704300PCinSDGuest[quote=patb][quote=pabloesqobar]Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
Google is your friend.[/quote]
But at this point, they need leave to appeal
or they need a conflicting ruling from another department of the Appellate division.If i got it right, they have an appeal by right to the appellate division, they don’t have a appeal by right to the NY Court of Appeals.
Much as in Federal law. You can appeal a district court ruling to the appellate court, but the Supremes need to decide to take a case.[/quote]
Yep, it’s discretionary, just like in CA and probably every other state. The odds of the Supreme Ct taking your appeal is slim. I may be jaded, but I think that lets the Court of Appeal make wrong decisions, not certify it for publication, knowing that it’s bad law and that it can’t/won’t get appealed.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.