- This topic has 935 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 30, 2010 at 9:03 PM #575209June 30, 2010 at 9:37 PM #574208sdrealtorParticipant
While SD R may have a reason to be defensive I have none.
Why couldnt you have bought Beryl? Actually you could have bought it. it was auctioned on the courthouse steps with a minimum bid of $450,000 and there were no takers. You could have paid that and it would have been a great deal.
It was listed at $418K which is an insanely low price in this market. It sold in 2002 for 480K which is almost 20% more than that. There have been 2 closed sales under 600K in that area (480K and 515K) and both had 3,000 sq ft lots while this one had a 6800 sq ft lot. It must have been a nornet’s nest of activity on that one. As DLJ pointed out on another thread there is tons of DEMAND at the right price. That was at the right price and you were one tiny voice in huge mosh pit of buyer activity.
June 30, 2010 at 9:37 PM #574305sdrealtorParticipantWhile SD R may have a reason to be defensive I have none.
Why couldnt you have bought Beryl? Actually you could have bought it. it was auctioned on the courthouse steps with a minimum bid of $450,000 and there were no takers. You could have paid that and it would have been a great deal.
It was listed at $418K which is an insanely low price in this market. It sold in 2002 for 480K which is almost 20% more than that. There have been 2 closed sales under 600K in that area (480K and 515K) and both had 3,000 sq ft lots while this one had a 6800 sq ft lot. It must have been a nornet’s nest of activity on that one. As DLJ pointed out on another thread there is tons of DEMAND at the right price. That was at the right price and you were one tiny voice in huge mosh pit of buyer activity.
June 30, 2010 at 9:37 PM #574828sdrealtorParticipantWhile SD R may have a reason to be defensive I have none.
Why couldnt you have bought Beryl? Actually you could have bought it. it was auctioned on the courthouse steps with a minimum bid of $450,000 and there were no takers. You could have paid that and it would have been a great deal.
It was listed at $418K which is an insanely low price in this market. It sold in 2002 for 480K which is almost 20% more than that. There have been 2 closed sales under 600K in that area (480K and 515K) and both had 3,000 sq ft lots while this one had a 6800 sq ft lot. It must have been a nornet’s nest of activity on that one. As DLJ pointed out on another thread there is tons of DEMAND at the right price. That was at the right price and you were one tiny voice in huge mosh pit of buyer activity.
June 30, 2010 at 9:37 PM #574934sdrealtorParticipantWhile SD R may have a reason to be defensive I have none.
Why couldnt you have bought Beryl? Actually you could have bought it. it was auctioned on the courthouse steps with a minimum bid of $450,000 and there were no takers. You could have paid that and it would have been a great deal.
It was listed at $418K which is an insanely low price in this market. It sold in 2002 for 480K which is almost 20% more than that. There have been 2 closed sales under 600K in that area (480K and 515K) and both had 3,000 sq ft lots while this one had a 6800 sq ft lot. It must have been a nornet’s nest of activity on that one. As DLJ pointed out on another thread there is tons of DEMAND at the right price. That was at the right price and you were one tiny voice in huge mosh pit of buyer activity.
June 30, 2010 at 9:37 PM #575234sdrealtorParticipantWhile SD R may have a reason to be defensive I have none.
Why couldnt you have bought Beryl? Actually you could have bought it. it was auctioned on the courthouse steps with a minimum bid of $450,000 and there were no takers. You could have paid that and it would have been a great deal.
It was listed at $418K which is an insanely low price in this market. It sold in 2002 for 480K which is almost 20% more than that. There have been 2 closed sales under 600K in that area (480K and 515K) and both had 3,000 sq ft lots while this one had a 6800 sq ft lot. It must have been a nornet’s nest of activity on that one. As DLJ pointed out on another thread there is tons of DEMAND at the right price. That was at the right price and you were one tiny voice in huge mosh pit of buyer activity.
June 30, 2010 at 9:57 PM #574223jpinpbParticipantsdr – I’m pretty confident that Beryl is being sold to an investor/flipper. End of that story.
June 30, 2010 at 9:57 PM #574320jpinpbParticipantsdr – I’m pretty confident that Beryl is being sold to an investor/flipper. End of that story.
June 30, 2010 at 9:57 PM #574843jpinpbParticipantsdr – I’m pretty confident that Beryl is being sold to an investor/flipper. End of that story.
June 30, 2010 at 9:57 PM #574949jpinpbParticipantsdr – I’m pretty confident that Beryl is being sold to an investor/flipper. End of that story.
June 30, 2010 at 9:57 PM #575249jpinpbParticipantsdr – I’m pretty confident that Beryl is being sold to an investor/flipper. End of that story.
June 30, 2010 at 10:23 PM #574228sdrealtorParticipantBut you had your chance so you could have bought it. An investor buyer wouldnt surprise me. The bank might have taken a lower all cash offer instead of a financed and even FHA offer. Isnt that what you are proposing to use?
A 6800 sq ft lot might be splitable and building two homes on it could be the highest and best use of the property. Of course its not the end of the story until the story ends.
June 30, 2010 at 10:23 PM #574325sdrealtorParticipantBut you had your chance so you could have bought it. An investor buyer wouldnt surprise me. The bank might have taken a lower all cash offer instead of a financed and even FHA offer. Isnt that what you are proposing to use?
A 6800 sq ft lot might be splitable and building two homes on it could be the highest and best use of the property. Of course its not the end of the story until the story ends.
June 30, 2010 at 10:23 PM #574848sdrealtorParticipantBut you had your chance so you could have bought it. An investor buyer wouldnt surprise me. The bank might have taken a lower all cash offer instead of a financed and even FHA offer. Isnt that what you are proposing to use?
A 6800 sq ft lot might be splitable and building two homes on it could be the highest and best use of the property. Of course its not the end of the story until the story ends.
June 30, 2010 at 10:23 PM #574954sdrealtorParticipantBut you had your chance so you could have bought it. An investor buyer wouldnt surprise me. The bank might have taken a lower all cash offer instead of a financed and even FHA offer. Isnt that what you are proposing to use?
A 6800 sq ft lot might be splitable and building two homes on it could be the highest and best use of the property. Of course its not the end of the story until the story ends.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.