- This topic has 785 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 4, 2010 at 8:35 PM #510217February 4, 2010 at 8:50 PM #509317DWCAPParticipant
TG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.
February 4, 2010 at 8:50 PM #509463DWCAPParticipantTG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.
February 4, 2010 at 8:50 PM #509876DWCAPParticipantTG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.
February 4, 2010 at 8:50 PM #509968DWCAPParticipantTG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.
February 4, 2010 at 8:50 PM #510222DWCAPParticipantTG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.
February 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM #509322outtamojoParticipant“TG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.”
Spot on bro. Great job spelling things out tho TG.
February 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM #509468outtamojoParticipant“TG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.”
Spot on bro. Great job spelling things out tho TG.
February 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM #509881outtamojoParticipant“TG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.”
Spot on bro. Great job spelling things out tho TG.
February 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM #509973outtamojoParticipant“TG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.”
Spot on bro. Great job spelling things out tho TG.
February 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM #510227outtamojoParticipant“TG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.”
Spot on bro. Great job spelling things out tho TG.
February 4, 2010 at 9:26 PM #509337temeculaguyParticipantMy bad, they really need to add one more line to the warnings on mixing nyquil and wine to include “may inhibit your ability to identify emoticons.”
I guess I overeact lately because mojo’s sarcastic statement is now the water cooler talk amongst my real life friends who are always behind the curve. In 2007 they repeated the NAR’s spin and now they repeat what they get from the MSM, which is what I was telling them a few years ago and is circa 2007 piggington, but is no longer valid. My apologies for not taking a second look before responding.
February 4, 2010 at 9:26 PM #509483temeculaguyParticipantMy bad, they really need to add one more line to the warnings on mixing nyquil and wine to include “may inhibit your ability to identify emoticons.”
I guess I overeact lately because mojo’s sarcastic statement is now the water cooler talk amongst my real life friends who are always behind the curve. In 2007 they repeated the NAR’s spin and now they repeat what they get from the MSM, which is what I was telling them a few years ago and is circa 2007 piggington, but is no longer valid. My apologies for not taking a second look before responding.
February 4, 2010 at 9:26 PM #509896temeculaguyParticipantMy bad, they really need to add one more line to the warnings on mixing nyquil and wine to include “may inhibit your ability to identify emoticons.”
I guess I overeact lately because mojo’s sarcastic statement is now the water cooler talk amongst my real life friends who are always behind the curve. In 2007 they repeated the NAR’s spin and now they repeat what they get from the MSM, which is what I was telling them a few years ago and is circa 2007 piggington, but is no longer valid. My apologies for not taking a second look before responding.
February 4, 2010 at 9:26 PM #509988temeculaguyParticipantMy bad, they really need to add one more line to the warnings on mixing nyquil and wine to include “may inhibit your ability to identify emoticons.”
I guess I overeact lately because mojo’s sarcastic statement is now the water cooler talk amongst my real life friends who are always behind the curve. In 2007 they repeated the NAR’s spin and now they repeat what they get from the MSM, which is what I was telling them a few years ago and is circa 2007 piggington, but is no longer valid. My apologies for not taking a second look before responding.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.