Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Non-salary CA budget cuts
- This topic has 380 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 21, 2009 at 2:03 AM #404272May 21, 2009 at 3:33 AM #403598
Eugene
ParticipantIllegal immigration is easy to criticize. I will be the first to agree that CA should bill Washington for all services, be it healthcare, education, etc, provided to illegal immigrants and their children.
However, if you get fixated on illegals, you will miss another important point – for each illegal immigrant you have one foreign-born legal immigrant from a Spanish-speaking country, and two Spanish-speaking people born this side of the border. They look like illegals, they talk like illegals, but they are as American as apple pie and there’s no legal justification to withhold any benefits from them. In fact, illegal immigrants are less likely to have children than bona fide transplants. Your article estimates 1 million children of illegals in CA K-12 system. Total hispanic enrollment in K-12 is over 3 million. Two thirds of these 3 million enter the system without sufficient knowledge of spoken English.
The correct definition of the problem is that a considerable part of population of California is low-income, uninsured, and uneducated. This problem is not solved by deporting all illegals.
May 21, 2009 at 3:33 AM #403852Eugene
ParticipantIllegal immigration is easy to criticize. I will be the first to agree that CA should bill Washington for all services, be it healthcare, education, etc, provided to illegal immigrants and their children.
However, if you get fixated on illegals, you will miss another important point – for each illegal immigrant you have one foreign-born legal immigrant from a Spanish-speaking country, and two Spanish-speaking people born this side of the border. They look like illegals, they talk like illegals, but they are as American as apple pie and there’s no legal justification to withhold any benefits from them. In fact, illegal immigrants are less likely to have children than bona fide transplants. Your article estimates 1 million children of illegals in CA K-12 system. Total hispanic enrollment in K-12 is over 3 million. Two thirds of these 3 million enter the system without sufficient knowledge of spoken English.
The correct definition of the problem is that a considerable part of population of California is low-income, uninsured, and uneducated. This problem is not solved by deporting all illegals.
May 21, 2009 at 3:33 AM #404091Eugene
ParticipantIllegal immigration is easy to criticize. I will be the first to agree that CA should bill Washington for all services, be it healthcare, education, etc, provided to illegal immigrants and their children.
However, if you get fixated on illegals, you will miss another important point – for each illegal immigrant you have one foreign-born legal immigrant from a Spanish-speaking country, and two Spanish-speaking people born this side of the border. They look like illegals, they talk like illegals, but they are as American as apple pie and there’s no legal justification to withhold any benefits from them. In fact, illegal immigrants are less likely to have children than bona fide transplants. Your article estimates 1 million children of illegals in CA K-12 system. Total hispanic enrollment in K-12 is over 3 million. Two thirds of these 3 million enter the system without sufficient knowledge of spoken English.
The correct definition of the problem is that a considerable part of population of California is low-income, uninsured, and uneducated. This problem is not solved by deporting all illegals.
May 21, 2009 at 3:33 AM #404149Eugene
ParticipantIllegal immigration is easy to criticize. I will be the first to agree that CA should bill Washington for all services, be it healthcare, education, etc, provided to illegal immigrants and their children.
However, if you get fixated on illegals, you will miss another important point – for each illegal immigrant you have one foreign-born legal immigrant from a Spanish-speaking country, and two Spanish-speaking people born this side of the border. They look like illegals, they talk like illegals, but they are as American as apple pie and there’s no legal justification to withhold any benefits from them. In fact, illegal immigrants are less likely to have children than bona fide transplants. Your article estimates 1 million children of illegals in CA K-12 system. Total hispanic enrollment in K-12 is over 3 million. Two thirds of these 3 million enter the system without sufficient knowledge of spoken English.
The correct definition of the problem is that a considerable part of population of California is low-income, uninsured, and uneducated. This problem is not solved by deporting all illegals.
May 21, 2009 at 3:33 AM #404299Eugene
ParticipantIllegal immigration is easy to criticize. I will be the first to agree that CA should bill Washington for all services, be it healthcare, education, etc, provided to illegal immigrants and their children.
However, if you get fixated on illegals, you will miss another important point – for each illegal immigrant you have one foreign-born legal immigrant from a Spanish-speaking country, and two Spanish-speaking people born this side of the border. They look like illegals, they talk like illegals, but they are as American as apple pie and there’s no legal justification to withhold any benefits from them. In fact, illegal immigrants are less likely to have children than bona fide transplants. Your article estimates 1 million children of illegals in CA K-12 system. Total hispanic enrollment in K-12 is over 3 million. Two thirds of these 3 million enter the system without sufficient knowledge of spoken English.
The correct definition of the problem is that a considerable part of population of California is low-income, uninsured, and uneducated. This problem is not solved by deporting all illegals.
May 21, 2009 at 8:05 AM #403623fun4vnay2
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy][quote=Eugene][quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
Not L.A. city, I know line men working for LADWP making over 150K a year, same for fire men and police.[/quote]
SDPD pays its officers 50-75K/year before overtime and benefits. And you have to be there a long time to qualify for the higher end of the range. If officers work overtime, it’s only fair that they would be paid more. You work double time, you get double salary.
https://apps.sandiego.gov/pjaol/currjob/control?view=OpenJobListing&job_category_cd=Safety+Srv
Also, that is not directly relevant to the discussion, because fire & police officers are paid from city and county budgets, not from the state budget. CHP officers may be paid from the state budget, but I’m not 100% sure of that either.[/quote]
So show me a software engineer not working 50-60 hours a week and I would say that is a lucky engineer. (if not just a temporary employee if you know what I mean)[/quote]
Good point and I agree cent percent. This is in general true for all knowledge based industry
I work for a big local telecom wireless company and everyone works atleast 50 hours a weekMay 21, 2009 at 8:05 AM #403876fun4vnay2
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy][quote=Eugene][quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
Not L.A. city, I know line men working for LADWP making over 150K a year, same for fire men and police.[/quote]
SDPD pays its officers 50-75K/year before overtime and benefits. And you have to be there a long time to qualify for the higher end of the range. If officers work overtime, it’s only fair that they would be paid more. You work double time, you get double salary.
https://apps.sandiego.gov/pjaol/currjob/control?view=OpenJobListing&job_category_cd=Safety+Srv
Also, that is not directly relevant to the discussion, because fire & police officers are paid from city and county budgets, not from the state budget. CHP officers may be paid from the state budget, but I’m not 100% sure of that either.[/quote]
So show me a software engineer not working 50-60 hours a week and I would say that is a lucky engineer. (if not just a temporary employee if you know what I mean)[/quote]
Good point and I agree cent percent. This is in general true for all knowledge based industry
I work for a big local telecom wireless company and everyone works atleast 50 hours a weekMay 21, 2009 at 8:05 AM #404115fun4vnay2
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy][quote=Eugene][quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
Not L.A. city, I know line men working for LADWP making over 150K a year, same for fire men and police.[/quote]
SDPD pays its officers 50-75K/year before overtime and benefits. And you have to be there a long time to qualify for the higher end of the range. If officers work overtime, it’s only fair that they would be paid more. You work double time, you get double salary.
https://apps.sandiego.gov/pjaol/currjob/control?view=OpenJobListing&job_category_cd=Safety+Srv
Also, that is not directly relevant to the discussion, because fire & police officers are paid from city and county budgets, not from the state budget. CHP officers may be paid from the state budget, but I’m not 100% sure of that either.[/quote]
So show me a software engineer not working 50-60 hours a week and I would say that is a lucky engineer. (if not just a temporary employee if you know what I mean)[/quote]
Good point and I agree cent percent. This is in general true for all knowledge based industry
I work for a big local telecom wireless company and everyone works atleast 50 hours a weekMay 21, 2009 at 8:05 AM #404174fun4vnay2
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy][quote=Eugene][quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
Not L.A. city, I know line men working for LADWP making over 150K a year, same for fire men and police.[/quote]
SDPD pays its officers 50-75K/year before overtime and benefits. And you have to be there a long time to qualify for the higher end of the range. If officers work overtime, it’s only fair that they would be paid more. You work double time, you get double salary.
https://apps.sandiego.gov/pjaol/currjob/control?view=OpenJobListing&job_category_cd=Safety+Srv
Also, that is not directly relevant to the discussion, because fire & police officers are paid from city and county budgets, not from the state budget. CHP officers may be paid from the state budget, but I’m not 100% sure of that either.[/quote]
So show me a software engineer not working 50-60 hours a week and I would say that is a lucky engineer. (if not just a temporary employee if you know what I mean)[/quote]
Good point and I agree cent percent. This is in general true for all knowledge based industry
I work for a big local telecom wireless company and everyone works atleast 50 hours a weekMay 21, 2009 at 8:05 AM #404325fun4vnay2
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy][quote=Eugene][quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
Not L.A. city, I know line men working for LADWP making over 150K a year, same for fire men and police.[/quote]
SDPD pays its officers 50-75K/year before overtime and benefits. And you have to be there a long time to qualify for the higher end of the range. If officers work overtime, it’s only fair that they would be paid more. You work double time, you get double salary.
https://apps.sandiego.gov/pjaol/currjob/control?view=OpenJobListing&job_category_cd=Safety+Srv
Also, that is not directly relevant to the discussion, because fire & police officers are paid from city and county budgets, not from the state budget. CHP officers may be paid from the state budget, but I’m not 100% sure of that either.[/quote]
So show me a software engineer not working 50-60 hours a week and I would say that is a lucky engineer. (if not just a temporary employee if you know what I mean)[/quote]
Good point and I agree cent percent. This is in general true for all knowledge based industry
I work for a big local telecom wireless company and everyone works atleast 50 hours a weekMay 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM #403639peterb
ParticipantReplace the pension system with 401K’s and hire more people. Reduces huge overhead obligations and the need for massive over-time.
Kinda like the private sector. What a concept.May 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM #403892peterb
ParticipantReplace the pension system with 401K’s and hire more people. Reduces huge overhead obligations and the need for massive over-time.
Kinda like the private sector. What a concept.May 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM #404130peterb
ParticipantReplace the pension system with 401K’s and hire more people. Reduces huge overhead obligations and the need for massive over-time.
Kinda like the private sector. What a concept.May 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM #404189peterb
ParticipantReplace the pension system with 401K’s and hire more people. Reduces huge overhead obligations and the need for massive over-time.
Kinda like the private sector. What a concept. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
