Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Non-salary CA budget cuts
- This topic has 380 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 22, 2009 at 11:04 AM #404945May 22, 2009 at 12:25 PM #404258EugeneParticipant
[quote=Wickedheart]
Well, I don’t believe it. Tell me the district and I’ll look up the salary schedule. Better yet, you show me since you’re the one making the claim.
[/quote]Second that request. 98k is an awful lot of money, that’s more than some professors make at UCSD. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
This is Temecula salary schedule
http://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/HRD/SalarySchedules/07_08/Certificated%20A.pdf
Perris
http://www.puhsd.org/www/puhsd/site/hosting/Teacher%20Salary%20Schedule.htm
A regular public school teacher could make 80k on a 9 month schedule if he or she has a Ph.D. degree and 12+ years of experience.
May 22, 2009 at 12:25 PM #404510EugeneParticipant[quote=Wickedheart]
Well, I don’t believe it. Tell me the district and I’ll look up the salary schedule. Better yet, you show me since you’re the one making the claim.
[/quote]Second that request. 98k is an awful lot of money, that’s more than some professors make at UCSD. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
This is Temecula salary schedule
http://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/HRD/SalarySchedules/07_08/Certificated%20A.pdf
Perris
http://www.puhsd.org/www/puhsd/site/hosting/Teacher%20Salary%20Schedule.htm
A regular public school teacher could make 80k on a 9 month schedule if he or she has a Ph.D. degree and 12+ years of experience.
May 22, 2009 at 12:25 PM #404748EugeneParticipant[quote=Wickedheart]
Well, I don’t believe it. Tell me the district and I’ll look up the salary schedule. Better yet, you show me since you’re the one making the claim.
[/quote]Second that request. 98k is an awful lot of money, that’s more than some professors make at UCSD. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
This is Temecula salary schedule
http://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/HRD/SalarySchedules/07_08/Certificated%20A.pdf
Perris
http://www.puhsd.org/www/puhsd/site/hosting/Teacher%20Salary%20Schedule.htm
A regular public school teacher could make 80k on a 9 month schedule if he or she has a Ph.D. degree and 12+ years of experience.
May 22, 2009 at 12:25 PM #404808EugeneParticipant[quote=Wickedheart]
Well, I don’t believe it. Tell me the district and I’ll look up the salary schedule. Better yet, you show me since you’re the one making the claim.
[/quote]Second that request. 98k is an awful lot of money, that’s more than some professors make at UCSD. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
This is Temecula salary schedule
http://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/HRD/SalarySchedules/07_08/Certificated%20A.pdf
Perris
http://www.puhsd.org/www/puhsd/site/hosting/Teacher%20Salary%20Schedule.htm
A regular public school teacher could make 80k on a 9 month schedule if he or she has a Ph.D. degree and 12+ years of experience.
May 22, 2009 at 12:25 PM #404955EugeneParticipant[quote=Wickedheart]
Well, I don’t believe it. Tell me the district and I’ll look up the salary schedule. Better yet, you show me since you’re the one making the claim.
[/quote]Second that request. 98k is an awful lot of money, that’s more than some professors make at UCSD. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
This is Temecula salary schedule
http://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/HRD/SalarySchedules/07_08/Certificated%20A.pdf
Perris
http://www.puhsd.org/www/puhsd/site/hosting/Teacher%20Salary%20Schedule.htm
A regular public school teacher could make 80k on a 9 month schedule if he or she has a Ph.D. degree and 12+ years of experience.
May 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM #404307DWCAPParticipant[quote=Eugene]Teachers are not extremely well paid here – worse than in the Northeast (NY, CT), for example.
[/quote]Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.
http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm
(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)
May 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM #404558DWCAPParticipant[quote=Eugene]Teachers are not extremely well paid here – worse than in the Northeast (NY, CT), for example.
[/quote]Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.
http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm
(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)
May 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM #404794DWCAPParticipant[quote=Eugene]Teachers are not extremely well paid here – worse than in the Northeast (NY, CT), for example.
[/quote]Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.
http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm
(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)
May 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM #404855DWCAPParticipant[quote=Eugene]Teachers are not extremely well paid here – worse than in the Northeast (NY, CT), for example.
[/quote]Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.
http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm
(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)
May 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM #405002DWCAPParticipant[quote=Eugene]Teachers are not extremely well paid here – worse than in the Northeast (NY, CT), for example.
[/quote]Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.
http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm
(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)
May 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM #404317EugeneParticipant[quote=DWCAP]
Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm
(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)
[/quote]
On the other hand, back in 2004, CA K-12 spending per pupil was ranked #29 in the nation, below national average. Top 3 were NJ, NY, CT. Three lowest-paying states were Idaho, Arizona, Utah (who needs teachers when you have preachers?)
Apparently, CA spends almost as much on teacher salaries as NY and CT (to be expected, considering our cost of living…) but skimps on everything else.
May 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM #404568EugeneParticipant[quote=DWCAP]
Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm
(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)
[/quote]
On the other hand, back in 2004, CA K-12 spending per pupil was ranked #29 in the nation, below national average. Top 3 were NJ, NY, CT. Three lowest-paying states were Idaho, Arizona, Utah (who needs teachers when you have preachers?)
Apparently, CA spends almost as much on teacher salaries as NY and CT (to be expected, considering our cost of living…) but skimps on everything else.
May 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM #404805EugeneParticipant[quote=DWCAP]
Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm
(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)
[/quote]
On the other hand, back in 2004, CA K-12 spending per pupil was ranked #29 in the nation, below national average. Top 3 were NJ, NY, CT. Three lowest-paying states were Idaho, Arizona, Utah (who needs teachers when you have preachers?)
Apparently, CA spends almost as much on teacher salaries as NY and CT (to be expected, considering our cost of living…) but skimps on everything else.
May 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM #404865EugeneParticipant[quote=DWCAP]
Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm
(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)
[/quote]
On the other hand, back in 2004, CA K-12 spending per pupil was ranked #29 in the nation, below national average. Top 3 were NJ, NY, CT. Three lowest-paying states were Idaho, Arizona, Utah (who needs teachers when you have preachers?)
Apparently, CA spends almost as much on teacher salaries as NY and CT (to be expected, considering our cost of living…) but skimps on everything else.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.