Non-salary CA budget cuts

[afx114]

I know quite a few teachers from all over the county, and they don’t get paid particularly well. Then again, all of the teachers I know don’t do it for the money, so it doesn’t bother them much.

[Eugene]

[quote=Wickedheart]
Well, I don’t believe it. Tell me the district and I’ll look up the salary schedule. Better yet, you show me since you’re the one making the claim.
[/quote]

Second that request. 98k is an awful lot of money, that’s more than some professors make at UCSD. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

This is Temecula salary schedule

http://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/HRD/SalarySchedules/07_08/Certificated%20A.pdf

Perris

http://www.puhsd.org/www/puhsd/site/hosting/Teacher%20Salary%20Schedule.htm

A regular public school teacher could make 80k on a 9 month schedule if he or she has a Ph.D. degree and 12+ years of experience.

[Eugene]

[quote=Wickedheart]
Well, I don’t believe it. Tell me the district and I’ll look up the salary schedule. Better yet, you show me since you’re the one making the claim.
[/quote]

Second that request. 98k is an awful lot of money, that’s more than some professors make at UCSD. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

This is Temecula salary schedule

http://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/HRD/SalarySchedules/07_08/Certificated%20A.pdf

Perris

http://www.puhsd.org/www/puhsd/site/hosting/Teacher%20Salary%20Schedule.htm

A regular public school teacher could make 80k on a 9 month schedule if he or she has a Ph.D. degree and 12+ years of experience.

[Eugene]

[quote=Wickedheart]
Well, I don’t believe it. Tell me the district and I’ll look up the salary schedule. Better yet, you show me since you’re the one making the claim.
[/quote]

Second that request. 98k is an awful lot of money, that’s more than some professors make at UCSD. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

This is Temecula salary schedule

http://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/HRD/SalarySchedules/07_08/Certificated%20A.pdf

Perris

http://www.puhsd.org/www/puhsd/site/hosting/Teacher%20Salary%20Schedule.htm

A regular public school teacher could make 80k on a 9 month schedule if he or she has a Ph.D. degree and 12+ years of experience.

[Eugene]

[quote=Wickedheart]
Well, I don’t believe it. Tell me the district and I’ll look up the salary schedule. Better yet, you show me since you’re the one making the claim.
[/quote]

Second that request. 98k is an awful lot of money, that’s more than some professors make at UCSD. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

This is Temecula salary schedule

http://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/HRD/SalarySchedules/07_08/Certificated%20A.pdf

Perris

http://www.puhsd.org/www/puhsd/site/hosting/Teacher%20Salary%20Schedule.htm

A regular public school teacher could make 80k on a 9 month schedule if he or she has a Ph.D. degree and 12+ years of experience.

[Eugene]

[quote=Wickedheart]
Well, I don’t believe it. Tell me the district and I’ll look up the salary schedule. Better yet, you show me since you’re the one making the claim.
[/quote]

Second that request. 98k is an awful lot of money, that’s more than some professors make at UCSD. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

This is Temecula salary schedule

http://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/HRD/SalarySchedules/07_08/Certificated%20A.pdf

Perris

http://www.puhsd.org/www/puhsd/site/hosting/Teacher%20Salary%20Schedule.htm

A regular public school teacher could make 80k on a 9 month schedule if he or she has a Ph.D. degree and 12+ years of experience.

[DWCAP]

[quote=Eugene]Teachers are not extremely well paid here – worse than in the Northeast (NY, CT), for example.
[/quote]

Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.

http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm

(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)

[DWCAP]

[quote=Eugene]Teachers are not extremely well paid here – worse than in the Northeast (NY, CT), for example.
[/quote]

Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.

http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm

(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)

[DWCAP]

[quote=Eugene]Teachers are not extremely well paid here – worse than in the Northeast (NY, CT), for example.
[/quote]

Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.

http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm

(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)

[DWCAP]

[quote=Eugene]Teachers are not extremely well paid here – worse than in the Northeast (NY, CT), for example.
[/quote]

Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.

http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm

(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)

[DWCAP]

[quote=Eugene]Teachers are not extremely well paid here – worse than in the Northeast (NY, CT), for example.
[/quote]

Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.

http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm

(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)

[Eugene]

[quote=DWCAP]
Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.

http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm

(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)

[/quote]

On the other hand, back in 2004, CA K-12 spending per pupil was ranked #29 in the nation, below national average. Top 3 were NJ, NY, CT. Three lowest-paying states were Idaho, Arizona, Utah (who needs teachers when you have preachers?)

Apparently, CA spends almost as much on teacher salaries as NY and CT (to be expected, considering our cost of living…) but skimps on everything else.

http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22519.html

[Eugene]

[quote=DWCAP]
Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.

http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm

(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)

[/quote]

On the other hand, back in 2004, CA K-12 spending per pupil was ranked #29 in the nation, below national average. Top 3 were NJ, NY, CT. Three lowest-paying states were Idaho, Arizona, Utah (who needs teachers when you have preachers?)

Apparently, CA spends almost as much on teacher salaries as NY and CT (to be expected, considering our cost of living…) but skimps on everything else.

http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22519.html

[Eugene]

[quote=DWCAP]
Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.

http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm

(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)

[/quote]

On the other hand, back in 2004, CA K-12 spending per pupil was ranked #29 in the nation, below national average. Top 3 were NJ, NY, CT. Three lowest-paying states were Idaho, Arizona, Utah (who needs teachers when you have preachers?)

Apparently, CA spends almost as much on teacher salaries as NY and CT (to be expected, considering our cost of living…) but skimps on everything else.

http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22519.html

[Eugene]

[quote=DWCAP]
Ok, I am not gonna say I know how to fix anything. I have been mulling what TG said earlier for a day or two now, and still have not made up my mind on alot of stuff. But the above comment doesnt mix well with SOME of the things I have been reading. The link below shows CA teachers at 120% of the national average, and certainly the highest in the west. I get the feeling that this is a data set that is highly dependent upon the standard being compared to for relivance to ones argument.

http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/salary/rankings.htm

(full disclosure, this only goes from 00-04, maybe everyone else just passed Ca teachers up? Gotta keep reading)

[/quote]

On the other hand, back in 2004, CA K-12 spending per pupil was ranked #29 in the nation, below national average. Top 3 were NJ, NY, CT. Three lowest-paying states were Idaho, Arizona, Utah (who needs teachers when you have preachers?)

Apparently, CA spends almost as much on teacher salaries as NY and CT (to be expected, considering our cost of living…) but skimps on everything else.

http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22519.html

[Author]

Posts