Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › No dip in county index for 8th straight month
- This topic has 90 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by outtamojo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 8, 2010 at 11:43 PM #16888January 9, 2010 at 12:16 AM #500446temeculaguyParticipant
Be careful mojo, you are going to get the tsuinami crowd all pissed off by using numbers and such. Might I suggest you mention relationships, child rearing or politics to take the focus off of numbers, especially those numbers that suggest the bottom has passed. Might I suggest that you attack the validity of the employment estimates because the estimator is a woman and probably hates short men, or that Obama forced them to put out rosy estimates, it just makes it more fun, nobody wants to swallow bitter pills.
January 9, 2010 at 12:16 AM #500993temeculaguyParticipantBe careful mojo, you are going to get the tsuinami crowd all pissed off by using numbers and such. Might I suggest you mention relationships, child rearing or politics to take the focus off of numbers, especially those numbers that suggest the bottom has passed. Might I suggest that you attack the validity of the employment estimates because the estimator is a woman and probably hates short men, or that Obama forced them to put out rosy estimates, it just makes it more fun, nobody wants to swallow bitter pills.
January 9, 2010 at 12:16 AM #501087temeculaguyParticipantBe careful mojo, you are going to get the tsuinami crowd all pissed off by using numbers and such. Might I suggest you mention relationships, child rearing or politics to take the focus off of numbers, especially those numbers that suggest the bottom has passed. Might I suggest that you attack the validity of the employment estimates because the estimator is a woman and probably hates short men, or that Obama forced them to put out rosy estimates, it just makes it more fun, nobody wants to swallow bitter pills.
January 9, 2010 at 12:16 AM #501330temeculaguyParticipantBe careful mojo, you are going to get the tsuinami crowd all pissed off by using numbers and such. Might I suggest you mention relationships, child rearing or politics to take the focus off of numbers, especially those numbers that suggest the bottom has passed. Might I suggest that you attack the validity of the employment estimates because the estimator is a woman and probably hates short men, or that Obama forced them to put out rosy estimates, it just makes it more fun, nobody wants to swallow bitter pills.
January 9, 2010 at 12:16 AM #500596temeculaguyParticipantBe careful mojo, you are going to get the tsuinami crowd all pissed off by using numbers and such. Might I suggest you mention relationships, child rearing or politics to take the focus off of numbers, especially those numbers that suggest the bottom has passed. Might I suggest that you attack the validity of the employment estimates because the estimator is a woman and probably hates short men, or that Obama forced them to put out rosy estimates, it just makes it more fun, nobody wants to swallow bitter pills.
January 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM #500637outtamojoParticipantI think I’m gonna locate and quote a local disciple of the Mayan calendar-the more dire the outcome the more believable you know.
January 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM #501033outtamojoParticipantI think I’m gonna locate and quote a local disciple of the Mayan calendar-the more dire the outcome the more believable you know.
January 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM #500486outtamojoParticipantI think I’m gonna locate and quote a local disciple of the Mayan calendar-the more dire the outcome the more believable you know.
January 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM #501126outtamojoParticipantI think I’m gonna locate and quote a local disciple of the Mayan calendar-the more dire the outcome the more believable you know.
January 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM #501371outtamojoParticipantI think I’m gonna locate and quote a local disciple of the Mayan calendar-the more dire the outcome the more believable you know.
January 9, 2010 at 1:39 PM #500690briansd1GuestTG, I’m not disagreeing with you on the general trend as far as the general economy is concerned. (although we lost jobs in December again).
But that doesn’t mean that individual houses values won’t fall from their precarious perches. Even as the economic decline has been arrested thanks to government action, there is still plenty of housing speculation “recycling” yet to occur.
Granted, my view is of Downtown San Diego and surrounding areas. I still believe that plenty of speculators will run out of wherewithal unless prices magically return to peak and beyond to make them whole again. That’s the market that I’m watching and I’m not seeing any let-up in distress.
With that said, I’m not a naysayer as I want modest economic growth so the Democrats and Obama get reelected. The economic policies of Democrats and Republicans aren’t much different. I just prefer the social and international-relations agenda of Democrats.
As far as California goes, I like Arnold. Too bad that he can’t run again.
I’m expecting a long period of house price stagnation with some bumps along the road.
January 9, 2010 at 1:39 PM #501086briansd1GuestTG, I’m not disagreeing with you on the general trend as far as the general economy is concerned. (although we lost jobs in December again).
But that doesn’t mean that individual houses values won’t fall from their precarious perches. Even as the economic decline has been arrested thanks to government action, there is still plenty of housing speculation “recycling” yet to occur.
Granted, my view is of Downtown San Diego and surrounding areas. I still believe that plenty of speculators will run out of wherewithal unless prices magically return to peak and beyond to make them whole again. That’s the market that I’m watching and I’m not seeing any let-up in distress.
With that said, I’m not a naysayer as I want modest economic growth so the Democrats and Obama get reelected. The economic policies of Democrats and Republicans aren’t much different. I just prefer the social and international-relations agenda of Democrats.
As far as California goes, I like Arnold. Too bad that he can’t run again.
I’m expecting a long period of house price stagnation with some bumps along the road.
January 9, 2010 at 1:39 PM #501179briansd1GuestTG, I’m not disagreeing with you on the general trend as far as the general economy is concerned. (although we lost jobs in December again).
But that doesn’t mean that individual houses values won’t fall from their precarious perches. Even as the economic decline has been arrested thanks to government action, there is still plenty of housing speculation “recycling” yet to occur.
Granted, my view is of Downtown San Diego and surrounding areas. I still believe that plenty of speculators will run out of wherewithal unless prices magically return to peak and beyond to make them whole again. That’s the market that I’m watching and I’m not seeing any let-up in distress.
With that said, I’m not a naysayer as I want modest economic growth so the Democrats and Obama get reelected. The economic policies of Democrats and Republicans aren’t much different. I just prefer the social and international-relations agenda of Democrats.
As far as California goes, I like Arnold. Too bad that he can’t run again.
I’m expecting a long period of house price stagnation with some bumps along the road.
January 9, 2010 at 1:39 PM #500539briansd1GuestTG, I’m not disagreeing with you on the general trend as far as the general economy is concerned. (although we lost jobs in December again).
But that doesn’t mean that individual houses values won’t fall from their precarious perches. Even as the economic decline has been arrested thanks to government action, there is still plenty of housing speculation “recycling” yet to occur.
Granted, my view is of Downtown San Diego and surrounding areas. I still believe that plenty of speculators will run out of wherewithal unless prices magically return to peak and beyond to make them whole again. That’s the market that I’m watching and I’m not seeing any let-up in distress.
With that said, I’m not a naysayer as I want modest economic growth so the Democrats and Obama get reelected. The economic policies of Democrats and Republicans aren’t much different. I just prefer the social and international-relations agenda of Democrats.
As far as California goes, I like Arnold. Too bad that he can’t run again.
I’m expecting a long period of house price stagnation with some bumps along the road.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.