- This topic has 105 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by Portlock.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 13, 2009 at 9:45 PM #429885July 13, 2009 at 10:06 PM #429159temeculaguyParticipant
Obese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”
July 13, 2009 at 10:06 PM #429375temeculaguyParticipantObese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”
July 13, 2009 at 10:06 PM #429664temeculaguyParticipantObese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”
July 13, 2009 at 10:06 PM #429734temeculaguyParticipantObese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”
July 13, 2009 at 10:06 PM #429895temeculaguyParticipantObese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”
July 13, 2009 at 10:17 PM #429174Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Obese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”[/quote]
TG: I love ya, brother! You are like a kamikaze pilot when it comes to the opposite sex and have the cojones to say what a lot of us dudes are thinking, but are too pussified to express.
Rock on, you crazy bastard!
You should get one of those rising sun headbands. It would fit the whole “Banzai!” image. Just sayin’.
July 13, 2009 at 10:17 PM #429390Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Obese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”[/quote]
TG: I love ya, brother! You are like a kamikaze pilot when it comes to the opposite sex and have the cojones to say what a lot of us dudes are thinking, but are too pussified to express.
Rock on, you crazy bastard!
You should get one of those rising sun headbands. It would fit the whole “Banzai!” image. Just sayin’.
July 13, 2009 at 10:17 PM #429679Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Obese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”[/quote]
TG: I love ya, brother! You are like a kamikaze pilot when it comes to the opposite sex and have the cojones to say what a lot of us dudes are thinking, but are too pussified to express.
Rock on, you crazy bastard!
You should get one of those rising sun headbands. It would fit the whole “Banzai!” image. Just sayin’.
July 13, 2009 at 10:17 PM #429749Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Obese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”[/quote]
TG: I love ya, brother! You are like a kamikaze pilot when it comes to the opposite sex and have the cojones to say what a lot of us dudes are thinking, but are too pussified to express.
Rock on, you crazy bastard!
You should get one of those rising sun headbands. It would fit the whole “Banzai!” image. Just sayin’.
July 13, 2009 at 10:17 PM #429910Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Obese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”[/quote]
TG: I love ya, brother! You are like a kamikaze pilot when it comes to the opposite sex and have the cojones to say what a lot of us dudes are thinking, but are too pussified to express.
Rock on, you crazy bastard!
You should get one of those rising sun headbands. It would fit the whole “Banzai!” image. Just sayin’.
July 13, 2009 at 10:23 PM #429183CoronitaParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Obese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”[/quote]
Baby got back!…There i said it on two threads π
July 13, 2009 at 10:23 PM #429399CoronitaParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Obese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”[/quote]
Baby got back!…There i said it on two threads π
July 13, 2009 at 10:23 PM #429689CoronitaParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Obese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”[/quote]
Baby got back!…There i said it on two threads π
July 13, 2009 at 10:23 PM #429758CoronitaParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Obese? I actually was unaware of the appointment so I ran a yahoo image search of Dr. Regina Benjamin. She is not obese, maybe a little thick, certainly beans and rice didn’t miss her but she doesn’t qualify as obese because based on her pictures (not the government’s version of obesity, but a heterosexual man’s) because her bust size exceeds her waist size. While she doesn’t neccesarily do it for me, She fit in the formula I have spent years creating. Just like financial formulas, formulas for objectifying women are just as fun. O.K., here’s the secret, it’s taken me years to perfect it but it’s simple. There are three measurements used for women, usually in inches, bust size, waist size and hips, in that order. As long as the middle number is smaller that the other two, it’s all good, reagardless of the size of the numbers, the larger the difference, the better. I believe the modern day poet, sir mixx alot, said it best: “36-24-36, only if she’s 5’3″”[/quote]
Baby got back!…There i said it on two threads π
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.