- This topic has 84 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 13, 2011 at 8:33 PM #734616December 13, 2011 at 10:52 PM #734622AnonymousGuest
Rich, you can delete this account too, since my muse is now gone and my name lacks the context which once made it clever. Unless, of course, you can think of others on this board whose arguments can be sarcastically refuted with verbatim quotes from Newt Gingrich, in which case I’ll be happy to continue providing you with that service.
I’m too intellectual; I’m too abstract; I think too much.
December 14, 2011 at 2:17 AM #734628CA renterParticipant[quote=walterwhite]Which leads to my new theory of humanity; there are two kinds of users–those who want to ignore themselves, and those who want to ignore everyone else.
Some cannot look in the mirror; others only wish to live in a hall of mirrors.[/quote]
See, it’s nuggets like this one that we can’t get from anyone else but you, scaredy. 🙂
December 14, 2011 at 12:55 PM #734646sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]FWIW, I won’t be ignoring any Pigg at present, REGARDLESS of their “idiosyncrasies.” I enjoy reading EVERYONE’s posts …
If any Pigg wishes to “ignore” me, GO FOR IT!! And more power to ya …[/quote]
Wow. Your shortest post ever. Nice work 🙂
December 14, 2011 at 4:12 PM #734665bearishgurlParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]Wow. Your shortest post ever. Nice work :)[/quote]
I find it odd that you post this, sdduuuude. I could name off a couple dozen Piggs whose posts are habitually longer than mine.
Does this mean you are on board with or agree with the substance or content of my posts since all you appear to have to say here is (“they”) are “too long?”
Or do you just have issues with your reading comprehension and/or attention span …??
LOL . . . ;=D
December 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM #734667NotCrankyParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdduuuude]Wow. Your shortest post ever. Nice work :)[/quote]
I find it odd that you post this, sdduuuude. I could name off a couple dozen Piggs whose posts are habitually longer than mine.
Does this mean you are on board with or agree with the substance or content of my posts since all you appear to have to say here is (“they”) are “too long?”
Or do you just have issues with your reading comprehension and/or attention span …??
LOL . . . ;=D[/quote]
If I had to guess, BG….he was being a little friendly.
December 14, 2011 at 5:17 PM #734668jstoeszParticipantFor the record, I just assumed newtosd was sarcastic too…sad really.
December 14, 2011 at 6:22 PM #734673CoronitaParticipant[quote=jstoesz]For the record, I just assumed newtosd was sarcastic too…sad really.[/quote]
Not really.
December 14, 2011 at 9:50 PM #734677urbanrealtorParticipantSome men just want to watch the world burn.
December 14, 2011 at 10:33 PM #734679sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdduuuude]Wow. Your shortest post ever. Nice work :)[/quote]
I find it odd that you post this, sdduuuude. I could name off a couple dozen Piggs whose posts are habitually longer than mine.
Does this mean you are on board with or agree with the substance or content of my posts since all you appear to have to say here is (“they”) are “too long?”
Or do you just have issues with your reading comprehension and/or attention span …??
LOL . . . ;=D[/quote]
To be honest, I neither agree or disagree with you because your posts are so numerous and long that I simply don’t have the patience to get through them.
I look for posts with a high insight-per-word ratio – possibly due to my attention span, yes, thank you.
At least I haven’t ignored you.
I was being a little friendly and hinting that shorter posts would serve you (and every one else) better, in my opinion.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.