- This topic has 69 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by
scott.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 27, 2007 at 12:41 PM #103925November 27, 2007 at 12:41 PM #104072
brian_in_la
ParticipantHey Scott – did you peak at the tiered data? The low end in SD was down 3.5%. Ouch!
LA still not declining as sharply as SD. But, close to 2% declines in the low end here in LA as well. SD is 6-12 months ahead of us.
It is going to be a brutal winter.
November 27, 2007 at 12:41 PM #104011ParticipantHey Scott – did you peak at the tiered data? The low end in SD was down 3.5%. Ouch!
LA still not declining as sharply as SD. But, close to 2% declines in the low end here in LA as well. SD is 6-12 months ahead of us.
It is going to be a brutal winter.
November 27, 2007 at 12:41 PM #104023ParticipantHey Scott – did you peak at the tiered data? The low end in SD was down 3.5%. Ouch!
LA still not declining as sharply as SD. But, close to 2% declines in the low end here in LA as well. SD is 6-12 months ahead of us.
It is going to be a brutal winter.
November 27, 2007 at 12:41 PM #104050ParticipantHey Scott – did you peak at the tiered data? The low end in SD was down 3.5%. Ouch!
LA still not declining as sharply as SD. But, close to 2% declines in the low end here in LA as well. SD is 6-12 months ahead of us.
It is going to be a brutal winter.
November 27, 2007 at 1:44 PM #104102scott
ParticipantJust ran some of the tiered numbers: zing!
Tier LOW MID HIGH
MoM 3.56% 1.17% 1.54%
YoY 15.76% 10.31% 5.59%
Peak 16.43% 12.30% 7.22%Tier cusp change:
Low: -$7467
Mid: -$2657Kind of feels like I made an extra $7467 in September.
November 27, 2007 at 1:44 PM #104079ParticipantJust ran some of the tiered numbers: zing!
Tier LOW MID HIGH
MoM 3.56% 1.17% 1.54%
YoY 15.76% 10.31% 5.59%
Peak 16.43% 12.30% 7.22%Tier cusp change:
Low: -$7467
Mid: -$2657Kind of feels like I made an extra $7467 in September.
November 27, 2007 at 1:44 PM #104053ParticipantJust ran some of the tiered numbers: zing!
Tier LOW MID HIGH
MoM 3.56% 1.17% 1.54%
YoY 15.76% 10.31% 5.59%
Peak 16.43% 12.30% 7.22%Tier cusp change:
Low: -$7467
Mid: -$2657Kind of feels like I made an extra $7467 in September.
November 27, 2007 at 1:44 PM #104041ParticipantJust ran some of the tiered numbers: zing!
Tier LOW MID HIGH
MoM 3.56% 1.17% 1.54%
YoY 15.76% 10.31% 5.59%
Peak 16.43% 12.30% 7.22%Tier cusp change:
Low: -$7467
Mid: -$2657Kind of feels like I made an extra $7467 in September.
November 27, 2007 at 1:44 PM #103954ParticipantJust ran some of the tiered numbers: zing!
Tier LOW MID HIGH
MoM 3.56% 1.17% 1.54%
YoY 15.76% 10.31% 5.59%
Peak 16.43% 12.30% 7.22%Tier cusp change:
Low: -$7467
Mid: -$2657Kind of feels like I made an extra $7467 in September.
November 27, 2007 at 2:18 PM #104051TW
ParticipantCan someone briefly summarize (AGAIN) the exact C-S method.
I read a VOSD article that seemed to say the C-S method compares actual selling prices of homes that have sold versus what they sold before.
I thought it was based on the same set of houses being re-appraised over and over (regardless of whether they were actually for sale)?
TIA
November 27, 2007 at 2:18 PM #104063ParticipantCan someone briefly summarize (AGAIN) the exact C-S method.
I read a VOSD article that seemed to say the C-S method compares actual selling prices of homes that have sold versus what they sold before.
I thought it was based on the same set of houses being re-appraised over and over (regardless of whether they were actually for sale)?
TIA
November 27, 2007 at 2:18 PM #104110ParticipantCan someone briefly summarize (AGAIN) the exact C-S method.
I read a VOSD article that seemed to say the C-S method compares actual selling prices of homes that have sold versus what they sold before.
I thought it was based on the same set of houses being re-appraised over and over (regardless of whether they were actually for sale)?
TIA
November 27, 2007 at 2:18 PM #103964ParticipantCan someone briefly summarize (AGAIN) the exact C-S method.
I read a VOSD article that seemed to say the C-S method compares actual selling prices of homes that have sold versus what they sold before.
I thought it was based on the same set of houses being re-appraised over and over (regardless of whether they were actually for sale)?
TIA
November 27, 2007 at 2:18 PM #104089ParticipantCan someone briefly summarize (AGAIN) the exact C-S method.
I read a VOSD article that seemed to say the C-S method compares actual selling prices of homes that have sold versus what they sold before.
I thought it was based on the same set of houses being re-appraised over and over (regardless of whether they were actually for sale)?
TIA
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.