- This topic has 50 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 25, 2010 at 1:14 PM #518670February 25, 2010 at 9:46 PM #518038
SD Realtor
ParticipantWhy stop at real estate Brian? It is clearly your opinion that govt can run many essential functions with much “less margin” correct? If you feel the govt can do a better job lending, health care, running auto companies…etc… why stop there?
February 25, 2010 at 9:46 PM #518180ParticipantWhy stop at real estate Brian? It is clearly your opinion that govt can run many essential functions with much “less margin” correct? If you feel the govt can do a better job lending, health care, running auto companies…etc… why stop there?
February 25, 2010 at 9:46 PM #518613ParticipantWhy stop at real estate Brian? It is clearly your opinion that govt can run many essential functions with much “less margin” correct? If you feel the govt can do a better job lending, health care, running auto companies…etc… why stop there?
February 25, 2010 at 9:46 PM #518707ParticipantWhy stop at real estate Brian? It is clearly your opinion that govt can run many essential functions with much “less margin” correct? If you feel the govt can do a better job lending, health care, running auto companies…etc… why stop there?
February 25, 2010 at 9:46 PM #518960ParticipantWhy stop at real estate Brian? It is clearly your opinion that govt can run many essential functions with much “less margin” correct? If you feel the govt can do a better job lending, health care, running auto companies…etc… why stop there?
February 25, 2010 at 10:27 PM #518053briansd1
GuestThat is incorrect SD Realtor. In response to AN, I said that if the government left RE to market forces, the margins would be much thinner and the real estate folks would make much less money.
That should be a position that Republicans should support, I would think.
I believe that government action is necessary at times, when appropriate, because the government can do certain things very well (like health care).
Conservatives are the ones who claim that the government should get out of way. But they don’t really mean it.
February 25, 2010 at 10:27 PM #518195GuestThat is incorrect SD Realtor. In response to AN, I said that if the government left RE to market forces, the margins would be much thinner and the real estate folks would make much less money.
That should be a position that Republicans should support, I would think.
I believe that government action is necessary at times, when appropriate, because the government can do certain things very well (like health care).
Conservatives are the ones who claim that the government should get out of way. But they don’t really mean it.
February 25, 2010 at 10:27 PM #518628GuestThat is incorrect SD Realtor. In response to AN, I said that if the government left RE to market forces, the margins would be much thinner and the real estate folks would make much less money.
That should be a position that Republicans should support, I would think.
I believe that government action is necessary at times, when appropriate, because the government can do certain things very well (like health care).
Conservatives are the ones who claim that the government should get out of way. But they don’t really mean it.
February 25, 2010 at 10:27 PM #518722GuestThat is incorrect SD Realtor. In response to AN, I said that if the government left RE to market forces, the margins would be much thinner and the real estate folks would make much less money.
That should be a position that Republicans should support, I would think.
I believe that government action is necessary at times, when appropriate, because the government can do certain things very well (like health care).
Conservatives are the ones who claim that the government should get out of way. But they don’t really mean it.
February 25, 2010 at 10:27 PM #518975GuestThat is incorrect SD Realtor. In response to AN, I said that if the government left RE to market forces, the margins would be much thinner and the real estate folks would make much less money.
That should be a position that Republicans should support, I would think.
I believe that government action is necessary at times, when appropriate, because the government can do certain things very well (like health care).
Conservatives are the ones who claim that the government should get out of way. But they don’t really mean it.
February 25, 2010 at 10:45 PM #518063ParticipantOkay thank you for the correction.
For the record, real estate is one of the most socialized programs if not the most.
If the govt would butt out then the market itself would be substantially healthier with much lower pricing. I could not agree more. If there was a blanket policy that everyone had to come up with 20% down we would be in a much much better spot.
I do believe that veterans should be granted an easier path because of the sacrifice they make for the country. So I am in favor of 100% financing for Vets.
However everyone else, tough beans. My apologies for misreading your post.
February 25, 2010 at 10:45 PM #518205ParticipantOkay thank you for the correction.
For the record, real estate is one of the most socialized programs if not the most.
If the govt would butt out then the market itself would be substantially healthier with much lower pricing. I could not agree more. If there was a blanket policy that everyone had to come up with 20% down we would be in a much much better spot.
I do believe that veterans should be granted an easier path because of the sacrifice they make for the country. So I am in favor of 100% financing for Vets.
However everyone else, tough beans. My apologies for misreading your post.
February 25, 2010 at 10:45 PM #518638ParticipantOkay thank you for the correction.
For the record, real estate is one of the most socialized programs if not the most.
If the govt would butt out then the market itself would be substantially healthier with much lower pricing. I could not agree more. If there was a blanket policy that everyone had to come up with 20% down we would be in a much much better spot.
I do believe that veterans should be granted an easier path because of the sacrifice they make for the country. So I am in favor of 100% financing for Vets.
However everyone else, tough beans. My apologies for misreading your post.
February 25, 2010 at 10:45 PM #518732ParticipantOkay thank you for the correction.
For the record, real estate is one of the most socialized programs if not the most.
If the govt would butt out then the market itself would be substantially healthier with much lower pricing. I could not agree more. If there was a blanket policy that everyone had to come up with 20% down we would be in a much much better spot.
I do believe that veterans should be granted an easier path because of the sacrifice they make for the country. So I am in favor of 100% financing for Vets.
However everyone else, tough beans. My apologies for misreading your post.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
