- This topic has 20 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 30, 2008 at 8:58 PM #14327October 31, 2008 at 12:56 PM #295719DoofratParticipant
Looks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
October 31, 2008 at 12:56 PM #296057DoofratParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
October 31, 2008 at 12:56 PM #296079DoofratParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
October 31, 2008 at 12:56 PM #296090DoofratParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
October 31, 2008 at 12:56 PM #296131DoofratParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
October 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM #296150crParticipant[quote=doofrat]Looks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.[/quote]
Definately not. But…
[quote=scaredycat]Basically, the bank could take the highest bid, or leave it, or counter.[/quote]
It sounds like banks are still holding on to false hope that housing may turn around next year. What basis they have for that is beyond me, but I’m looking forward to when the consensus is housing will never trend upward again. Then I’ll buy.
It sounds like they did sell though, so that’s a good sign.
799k to 240k = ouch! 70% drop!
October 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM #296191crParticipant[quote=doofrat]Looks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.[/quote]
Definately not. But…
[quote=scaredycat]Basically, the bank could take the highest bid, or leave it, or counter.[/quote]
It sounds like banks are still holding on to false hope that housing may turn around next year. What basis they have for that is beyond me, but I’m looking forward to when the consensus is housing will never trend upward again. Then I’ll buy.
It sounds like they did sell though, so that’s a good sign.
799k to 240k = ouch! 70% drop!
October 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM #296139crParticipant[quote=doofrat]Looks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.[/quote]
Definately not. But…
[quote=scaredycat]Basically, the bank could take the highest bid, or leave it, or counter.[/quote]
It sounds like banks are still holding on to false hope that housing may turn around next year. What basis they have for that is beyond me, but I’m looking forward to when the consensus is housing will never trend upward again. Then I’ll buy.
It sounds like they did sell though, so that’s a good sign.
799k to 240k = ouch! 70% drop!
October 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM #296117crParticipant[quote=doofrat]Looks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.[/quote]
Definately not. But…
[quote=scaredycat]Basically, the bank could take the highest bid, or leave it, or counter.[/quote]
It sounds like banks are still holding on to false hope that housing may turn around next year. What basis they have for that is beyond me, but I’m looking forward to when the consensus is housing will never trend upward again. Then I’ll buy.
It sounds like they did sell though, so that’s a good sign.
799k to 240k = ouch! 70% drop!
October 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM #295778crParticipant[quote=doofrat]Looks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.[/quote]
Definately not. But…
[quote=scaredycat]Basically, the bank could take the highest bid, or leave it, or counter.[/quote]
It sounds like banks are still holding on to false hope that housing may turn around next year. What basis they have for that is beyond me, but I’m looking forward to when the consensus is housing will never trend upward again. Then I’ll buy.
It sounds like they did sell though, so that’s a good sign.
799k to 240k = ouch! 70% drop!
November 1, 2008 at 1:18 AM #295974barnaby33Participantcooprider, I believe he said that they *might* have sold. The bank could still keep shopping, because it wasn’t a real auction with a published reserve.
JoshNovember 1, 2008 at 1:18 AM #296313barnaby33Participantcooprider, I believe he said that they *might* have sold. The bank could still keep shopping, because it wasn’t a real auction with a published reserve.
JoshNovember 1, 2008 at 1:18 AM #296334barnaby33Participantcooprider, I believe he said that they *might* have sold. The bank could still keep shopping, because it wasn’t a real auction with a published reserve.
JoshNovember 1, 2008 at 1:18 AM #296345barnaby33Participantcooprider, I believe he said that they *might* have sold. The bank could still keep shopping, because it wasn’t a real auction with a published reserve.
Josh -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.