Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Multiple-family mortgages
- This topic has 55 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 6, 2008 at 6:16 PM #12008
-
March 6, 2008 at 6:31 PM #165216
patb
Participantco owner is ahassle to operate but easier to qualify if there are more
people who have assets to back the play,-
March 6, 2008 at 6:41 PM #165221
surveyor
Participantdon’t
I don’t recommend it – too many hassles (and this is coming from someone who can handle hassles). You will need to basically write up a partnership agreement to make sure that everyone does their fair share, when you can buy each other out, etc. What if the other person loses their job, and then can’t make up their mortgage payment, you will have to pick up the slack, etc. Too many what if’s when you are by yourself and it gets worse when you involve other people, particularly friends and family (a good way to ruin relationships is to involve friends and family in money).
As for qualifying for it, it’s not too difficult if the property is less than 5 units. That will make it residential and the LTV ratios, income requirements, and other documentation are not that severe.
Honestly, I would recommend just trying to qualify for the property on your own and see where that gets you. Do the math, see what you can afford, etc.
Oh, and by the way, if you are thinking of buying anywhere in California, I doubt there are any four plexes or less that will work as good income properties right now (I’ve been seeing four plexes for around $650k and more. It needs to get around $500k before it starts working).
-
March 7, 2008 at 2:00 PM #165643
beanmaestro
ParticipantI’d certainly prefer to buy the place outright, and rent the units directly to our friends, but I’m curious how both options work. Let me know if the “common sense” is correct:
Single Owner: My wife and I would probably need to have X% down, plus 6+ months savings, and income about Y times greater than (annual PMI – Z% of annual rent for units we won’t live in). What are X, Y, and Z likely to be?
Partnership: Together, we have to put A% down with 6+ months savings, and prove income B times greater than PMI. What are A and B? And obviously, we have to be crazy enough to set up such a partnership.
-
March 7, 2008 at 4:36 PM #165748
EconProf
ParticipantBobS
RUN, don’t walk, away from all partnership proposals. The odds against them working in the long run are overwhelming. -
March 7, 2008 at 5:04 PM #165762
beanmaestro
ParticipantWe’d be likely to go single-owner anyway because my wife and I have the lion’s share of the down payment. We wouldn’t even consider the partnership option except the people involved would probably be me, my wife, my best friend, her best friend, and maybe our double-dating couple.
So, does anyone have any thoughts on the X,Y,Z,A,B above?
-
March 7, 2008 at 6:15 PM #165816
Coronita
ParticipantMoney is a great source for failed friendships.
Did you say you would be doing this with your best friend and your best friend's friend and two couples that aren't even married?
XYZAB…too many variables (no pun intended), especially you don't even know first hand one of them and the other two aren't even married,.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
March 8, 2008 at 9:25 AM #166001
kewp
ParticipantOdds are its a bad idea.
But if you must, consider incorporating first. Buy the property via the business then.
-
March 8, 2008 at 10:35 AM #166010
temeculaguy
ParticipantAnother RUN, don’t walk vote. The odds are about 50/50 that you and your wife will still be together in eight years, the odds that three or four young couples are all together and all still friends is staggering. Something always happens, a partner couple gets divorced or has a financial hardship and wants to sell or be bought out when you aren’t ready or can’t. I have seen many of these involving rentals or vacation homes, still have never met anyone where it worked out and have never heard anyone say “I’d love to do that again.”
-
March 9, 2008 at 11:21 AM #166253
beanmaestro
ParticipantIt sounds like I should move the financing questions to another thread where I forget to mention the circumstances… I think this thread is doomed to discuss the pitfalls of partnership purchases 🙂
-
March 9, 2008 at 1:06 PM #166313
SD Realtor
ParticipantBeanmaestro I would be in the same camp as the others about multiple party ownership. That said, a more direct answer to your question is how to structure your ownership. You and others can own the property as joint tenants or tenants in common… etc… If you are going into a situation like you describe it would be best to structure the ownership in a manner that would be…. easier to deal with should things go wrong. That said, my advice would be to talk to a real estate attorney to find out about different ownership options. Once you see what different ownership options you have then you can talk to someone about financing based on the type of ownership.
SD Realtor
-
March 11, 2008 at 7:25 PM #167780
Aecetia
ParticipantSounds like a sure way to become ex best friends to me.
-
March 11, 2008 at 7:25 PM #168107
Aecetia
ParticipantSounds like a sure way to become ex best friends to me.
-
March 11, 2008 at 7:25 PM #168111
Aecetia
ParticipantSounds like a sure way to become ex best friends to me.
-
March 11, 2008 at 7:25 PM #168142
Aecetia
ParticipantSounds like a sure way to become ex best friends to me.
-
March 11, 2008 at 7:25 PM #168208
Aecetia
ParticipantSounds like a sure way to become ex best friends to me.
-
March 9, 2008 at 1:06 PM #166633
SD Realtor
ParticipantBeanmaestro I would be in the same camp as the others about multiple party ownership. That said, a more direct answer to your question is how to structure your ownership. You and others can own the property as joint tenants or tenants in common… etc… If you are going into a situation like you describe it would be best to structure the ownership in a manner that would be…. easier to deal with should things go wrong. That said, my advice would be to talk to a real estate attorney to find out about different ownership options. Once you see what different ownership options you have then you can talk to someone about financing based on the type of ownership.
SD Realtor
-
March 9, 2008 at 1:06 PM #166641
SD Realtor
ParticipantBeanmaestro I would be in the same camp as the others about multiple party ownership. That said, a more direct answer to your question is how to structure your ownership. You and others can own the property as joint tenants or tenants in common… etc… If you are going into a situation like you describe it would be best to structure the ownership in a manner that would be…. easier to deal with should things go wrong. That said, my advice would be to talk to a real estate attorney to find out about different ownership options. Once you see what different ownership options you have then you can talk to someone about financing based on the type of ownership.
SD Realtor
-
March 9, 2008 at 1:06 PM #166672
SD Realtor
ParticipantBeanmaestro I would be in the same camp as the others about multiple party ownership. That said, a more direct answer to your question is how to structure your ownership. You and others can own the property as joint tenants or tenants in common… etc… If you are going into a situation like you describe it would be best to structure the ownership in a manner that would be…. easier to deal with should things go wrong. That said, my advice would be to talk to a real estate attorney to find out about different ownership options. Once you see what different ownership options you have then you can talk to someone about financing based on the type of ownership.
SD Realtor
-
March 9, 2008 at 1:06 PM #166734
SD Realtor
ParticipantBeanmaestro I would be in the same camp as the others about multiple party ownership. That said, a more direct answer to your question is how to structure your ownership. You and others can own the property as joint tenants or tenants in common… etc… If you are going into a situation like you describe it would be best to structure the ownership in a manner that would be…. easier to deal with should things go wrong. That said, my advice would be to talk to a real estate attorney to find out about different ownership options. Once you see what different ownership options you have then you can talk to someone about financing based on the type of ownership.
SD Realtor
-
March 9, 2008 at 11:21 AM #166573
beanmaestro
ParticipantIt sounds like I should move the financing questions to another thread where I forget to mention the circumstances… I think this thread is doomed to discuss the pitfalls of partnership purchases 🙂
-
March 9, 2008 at 11:21 AM #166580
beanmaestro
ParticipantIt sounds like I should move the financing questions to another thread where I forget to mention the circumstances… I think this thread is doomed to discuss the pitfalls of partnership purchases 🙂
-
March 9, 2008 at 11:21 AM #166582
beanmaestro
ParticipantIt sounds like I should move the financing questions to another thread where I forget to mention the circumstances… I think this thread is doomed to discuss the pitfalls of partnership purchases 🙂
-
March 9, 2008 at 11:21 AM #166674
beanmaestro
ParticipantIt sounds like I should move the financing questions to another thread where I forget to mention the circumstances… I think this thread is doomed to discuss the pitfalls of partnership purchases 🙂
-
March 8, 2008 at 10:35 AM #166328
temeculaguy
ParticipantAnother RUN, don’t walk vote. The odds are about 50/50 that you and your wife will still be together in eight years, the odds that three or four young couples are all together and all still friends is staggering. Something always happens, a partner couple gets divorced or has a financial hardship and wants to sell or be bought out when you aren’t ready or can’t. I have seen many of these involving rentals or vacation homes, still have never met anyone where it worked out and have never heard anyone say “I’d love to do that again.”
-
March 8, 2008 at 10:35 AM #166336
temeculaguy
ParticipantAnother RUN, don’t walk vote. The odds are about 50/50 that you and your wife will still be together in eight years, the odds that three or four young couples are all together and all still friends is staggering. Something always happens, a partner couple gets divorced or has a financial hardship and wants to sell or be bought out when you aren’t ready or can’t. I have seen many of these involving rentals or vacation homes, still have never met anyone where it worked out and have never heard anyone say “I’d love to do that again.”
-
March 8, 2008 at 10:35 AM #166338
temeculaguy
ParticipantAnother RUN, don’t walk vote. The odds are about 50/50 that you and your wife will still be together in eight years, the odds that three or four young couples are all together and all still friends is staggering. Something always happens, a partner couple gets divorced or has a financial hardship and wants to sell or be bought out when you aren’t ready or can’t. I have seen many of these involving rentals or vacation homes, still have never met anyone where it worked out and have never heard anyone say “I’d love to do that again.”
-
March 8, 2008 at 10:35 AM #166430
temeculaguy
ParticipantAnother RUN, don’t walk vote. The odds are about 50/50 that you and your wife will still be together in eight years, the odds that three or four young couples are all together and all still friends is staggering. Something always happens, a partner couple gets divorced or has a financial hardship and wants to sell or be bought out when you aren’t ready or can’t. I have seen many of these involving rentals or vacation homes, still have never met anyone where it worked out and have never heard anyone say “I’d love to do that again.”
-
March 8, 2008 at 9:25 AM #166318
kewp
ParticipantOdds are its a bad idea.
But if you must, consider incorporating first. Buy the property via the business then.
-
March 8, 2008 at 9:25 AM #166326
kewp
ParticipantOdds are its a bad idea.
But if you must, consider incorporating first. Buy the property via the business then.
-
March 8, 2008 at 9:25 AM #166329
kewp
ParticipantOdds are its a bad idea.
But if you must, consider incorporating first. Buy the property via the business then.
-
March 8, 2008 at 9:25 AM #166419
kewp
ParticipantOdds are its a bad idea.
But if you must, consider incorporating first. Buy the property via the business then.
-
March 7, 2008 at 6:15 PM #166133
Coronita
ParticipantMoney is a great source for failed friendships.
Did you say you would be doing this with your best friend and your best friend's friend and two couples that aren't even married?
XYZAB…too many variables (no pun intended), especially you don't even know first hand one of them and the other two aren't even married,.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
March 7, 2008 at 6:15 PM #166141
Coronita
ParticipantMoney is a great source for failed friendships.
Did you say you would be doing this with your best friend and your best friend's friend and two couples that aren't even married?
XYZAB…too many variables (no pun intended), especially you don't even know first hand one of them and the other two aren't even married,.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
March 7, 2008 at 6:15 PM #166145
Coronita
ParticipantMoney is a great source for failed friendships.
Did you say you would be doing this with your best friend and your best friend's friend and two couples that aren't even married?
XYZAB…too many variables (no pun intended), especially you don't even know first hand one of them and the other two aren't even married,.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
March 7, 2008 at 6:15 PM #166232
Coronita
ParticipantMoney is a great source for failed friendships.
Did you say you would be doing this with your best friend and your best friend's friend and two couples that aren't even married?
XYZAB…too many variables (no pun intended), especially you don't even know first hand one of them and the other two aren't even married,.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
March 7, 2008 at 5:04 PM #166078
beanmaestro
ParticipantWe’d be likely to go single-owner anyway because my wife and I have the lion’s share of the down payment. We wouldn’t even consider the partnership option except the people involved would probably be me, my wife, my best friend, her best friend, and maybe our double-dating couple.
So, does anyone have any thoughts on the X,Y,Z,A,B above?
-
March 7, 2008 at 5:04 PM #166085
beanmaestro
ParticipantWe’d be likely to go single-owner anyway because my wife and I have the lion’s share of the down payment. We wouldn’t even consider the partnership option except the people involved would probably be me, my wife, my best friend, her best friend, and maybe our double-dating couple.
So, does anyone have any thoughts on the X,Y,Z,A,B above?
-
March 7, 2008 at 5:04 PM #166089
beanmaestro
ParticipantWe’d be likely to go single-owner anyway because my wife and I have the lion’s share of the down payment. We wouldn’t even consider the partnership option except the people involved would probably be me, my wife, my best friend, her best friend, and maybe our double-dating couple.
So, does anyone have any thoughts on the X,Y,Z,A,B above?
-
March 7, 2008 at 5:04 PM #166177
beanmaestro
ParticipantWe’d be likely to go single-owner anyway because my wife and I have the lion’s share of the down payment. We wouldn’t even consider the partnership option except the people involved would probably be me, my wife, my best friend, her best friend, and maybe our double-dating couple.
So, does anyone have any thoughts on the X,Y,Z,A,B above?
-
March 7, 2008 at 4:36 PM #166063
EconProf
ParticipantBobS
RUN, don’t walk, away from all partnership proposals. The odds against them working in the long run are overwhelming. -
March 7, 2008 at 4:36 PM #166070
EconProf
ParticipantBobS
RUN, don’t walk, away from all partnership proposals. The odds against them working in the long run are overwhelming. -
March 7, 2008 at 4:36 PM #166074
EconProf
ParticipantBobS
RUN, don’t walk, away from all partnership proposals. The odds against them working in the long run are overwhelming. -
March 7, 2008 at 4:36 PM #166162
EconProf
ParticipantBobS
RUN, don’t walk, away from all partnership proposals. The odds against them working in the long run are overwhelming. -
March 7, 2008 at 2:00 PM #165958
beanmaestro
ParticipantI’d certainly prefer to buy the place outright, and rent the units directly to our friends, but I’m curious how both options work. Let me know if the “common sense” is correct:
Single Owner: My wife and I would probably need to have X% down, plus 6+ months savings, and income about Y times greater than (annual PMI – Z% of annual rent for units we won’t live in). What are X, Y, and Z likely to be?
Partnership: Together, we have to put A% down with 6+ months savings, and prove income B times greater than PMI. What are A and B? And obviously, we have to be crazy enough to set up such a partnership.
-
March 7, 2008 at 2:00 PM #165965
beanmaestro
ParticipantI’d certainly prefer to buy the place outright, and rent the units directly to our friends, but I’m curious how both options work. Let me know if the “common sense” is correct:
Single Owner: My wife and I would probably need to have X% down, plus 6+ months savings, and income about Y times greater than (annual PMI – Z% of annual rent for units we won’t live in). What are X, Y, and Z likely to be?
Partnership: Together, we have to put A% down with 6+ months savings, and prove income B times greater than PMI. What are A and B? And obviously, we have to be crazy enough to set up such a partnership.
-
March 7, 2008 at 2:00 PM #165969
beanmaestro
ParticipantI’d certainly prefer to buy the place outright, and rent the units directly to our friends, but I’m curious how both options work. Let me know if the “common sense” is correct:
Single Owner: My wife and I would probably need to have X% down, plus 6+ months savings, and income about Y times greater than (annual PMI – Z% of annual rent for units we won’t live in). What are X, Y, and Z likely to be?
Partnership: Together, we have to put A% down with 6+ months savings, and prove income B times greater than PMI. What are A and B? And obviously, we have to be crazy enough to set up such a partnership.
-
March 7, 2008 at 2:00 PM #166057
beanmaestro
ParticipantI’d certainly prefer to buy the place outright, and rent the units directly to our friends, but I’m curious how both options work. Let me know if the “common sense” is correct:
Single Owner: My wife and I would probably need to have X% down, plus 6+ months savings, and income about Y times greater than (annual PMI – Z% of annual rent for units we won’t live in). What are X, Y, and Z likely to be?
Partnership: Together, we have to put A% down with 6+ months savings, and prove income B times greater than PMI. What are A and B? And obviously, we have to be crazy enough to set up such a partnership.
-
-
March 6, 2008 at 6:41 PM #165534
surveyor
Participantdon’t
I don’t recommend it – too many hassles (and this is coming from someone who can handle hassles). You will need to basically write up a partnership agreement to make sure that everyone does their fair share, when you can buy each other out, etc. What if the other person loses their job, and then can’t make up their mortgage payment, you will have to pick up the slack, etc. Too many what if’s when you are by yourself and it gets worse when you involve other people, particularly friends and family (a good way to ruin relationships is to involve friends and family in money).
As for qualifying for it, it’s not too difficult if the property is less than 5 units. That will make it residential and the LTV ratios, income requirements, and other documentation are not that severe.
Honestly, I would recommend just trying to qualify for the property on your own and see where that gets you. Do the math, see what you can afford, etc.
Oh, and by the way, if you are thinking of buying anywhere in California, I doubt there are any four plexes or less that will work as good income properties right now (I’ve been seeing four plexes for around $650k and more. It needs to get around $500k before it starts working).
-
March 6, 2008 at 6:41 PM #165546
surveyor
Participantdon’t
I don’t recommend it – too many hassles (and this is coming from someone who can handle hassles). You will need to basically write up a partnership agreement to make sure that everyone does their fair share, when you can buy each other out, etc. What if the other person loses their job, and then can’t make up their mortgage payment, you will have to pick up the slack, etc. Too many what if’s when you are by yourself and it gets worse when you involve other people, particularly friends and family (a good way to ruin relationships is to involve friends and family in money).
As for qualifying for it, it’s not too difficult if the property is less than 5 units. That will make it residential and the LTV ratios, income requirements, and other documentation are not that severe.
Honestly, I would recommend just trying to qualify for the property on your own and see where that gets you. Do the math, see what you can afford, etc.
Oh, and by the way, if you are thinking of buying anywhere in California, I doubt there are any four plexes or less that will work as good income properties right now (I’ve been seeing four plexes for around $650k and more. It needs to get around $500k before it starts working).
-
March 6, 2008 at 6:41 PM #165549
surveyor
Participantdon’t
I don’t recommend it – too many hassles (and this is coming from someone who can handle hassles). You will need to basically write up a partnership agreement to make sure that everyone does their fair share, when you can buy each other out, etc. What if the other person loses their job, and then can’t make up their mortgage payment, you will have to pick up the slack, etc. Too many what if’s when you are by yourself and it gets worse when you involve other people, particularly friends and family (a good way to ruin relationships is to involve friends and family in money).
As for qualifying for it, it’s not too difficult if the property is less than 5 units. That will make it residential and the LTV ratios, income requirements, and other documentation are not that severe.
Honestly, I would recommend just trying to qualify for the property on your own and see where that gets you. Do the math, see what you can afford, etc.
Oh, and by the way, if you are thinking of buying anywhere in California, I doubt there are any four plexes or less that will work as good income properties right now (I’ve been seeing four plexes for around $650k and more. It needs to get around $500k before it starts working).
-
March 6, 2008 at 6:41 PM #165635
surveyor
Participantdon’t
I don’t recommend it – too many hassles (and this is coming from someone who can handle hassles). You will need to basically write up a partnership agreement to make sure that everyone does their fair share, when you can buy each other out, etc. What if the other person loses their job, and then can’t make up their mortgage payment, you will have to pick up the slack, etc. Too many what if’s when you are by yourself and it gets worse when you involve other people, particularly friends and family (a good way to ruin relationships is to involve friends and family in money).
As for qualifying for it, it’s not too difficult if the property is less than 5 units. That will make it residential and the LTV ratios, income requirements, and other documentation are not that severe.
Honestly, I would recommend just trying to qualify for the property on your own and see where that gets you. Do the math, see what you can afford, etc.
Oh, and by the way, if you are thinking of buying anywhere in California, I doubt there are any four plexes or less that will work as good income properties right now (I’ve been seeing four plexes for around $650k and more. It needs to get around $500k before it starts working).
-
-
March 6, 2008 at 6:31 PM #165530
patb
Participantco owner is ahassle to operate but easier to qualify if there are more
people who have assets to back the play, -
March 6, 2008 at 6:31 PM #165541
patb
Participantco owner is ahassle to operate but easier to qualify if there are more
people who have assets to back the play, -
March 6, 2008 at 6:31 PM #165544
patb
Participantco owner is ahassle to operate but easier to qualify if there are more
people who have assets to back the play, -
March 6, 2008 at 6:31 PM #165631
patb
Participantco owner is ahassle to operate but easier to qualify if there are more
people who have assets to back the play,
-
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.