Menu

Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Most coveted zip code

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 166 total)
1 2 3 … 9 10 11 12
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 26, 2011 at 11:01 AM #714188
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=jpinpb]BG – I know your heart is in the right place and I appreciate it as we can be unrealtistic. Tough for me to actually not buy in PB, but I’m close enough now if I really want, I can have a nice walk to the bay. My DH is not going to drive 20 minutes. We have been there and know that eventually we just stop going. Now it is convenient at the last minute to say, “Let’s go,” and it not be a major project. He likes that. Though w/all our projects, we’ve had limited time to actually go to the bay. :([/quote]

    Oh, I wasn’t really serious 🙂 I understand that Clairemont and EC are apples and oranges. Yes, there IS the occasional cool breeze thru there in the summer, but the weather can’t compare with coastal and near-coastal communities. Lots of people don’t mind that and also don’t go to the beach very often, if at all. It is what it is (hotter and colder). That’s why you get a lot of “bang for your buck” out there :=]

    July 26, 2011 at 11:05 AM #712993
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1][quote=bearishgurl]

    Even though the 52 has a lunar landscape, I have to concede that it’s very convenient![/quote]

    That’s more like the natural So Cal landscape before we started importing plants and irrigating.[/quote]

    Absolutely agree that if SD did not have irrigation, it would look just like many areas of TJ. SD is a glorified, heavily irrigated desert … on the ocean. Nothing more.

    July 26, 2011 at 11:05 AM #713086
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1][quote=bearishgurl]

    Even though the 52 has a lunar landscape, I have to concede that it’s very convenient![/quote]

    That’s more like the natural So Cal landscape before we started importing plants and irrigating.[/quote]

    Absolutely agree that if SD did not have irrigation, it would look just like many areas of TJ. SD is a glorified, heavily irrigated desert … on the ocean. Nothing more.

    July 26, 2011 at 11:05 AM #713683
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1][quote=bearishgurl]

    Even though the 52 has a lunar landscape, I have to concede that it’s very convenient![/quote]

    That’s more like the natural So Cal landscape before we started importing plants and irrigating.[/quote]

    Absolutely agree that if SD did not have irrigation, it would look just like many areas of TJ. SD is a glorified, heavily irrigated desert … on the ocean. Nothing more.

    July 26, 2011 at 11:05 AM #713836
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1][quote=bearishgurl]

    Even though the 52 has a lunar landscape, I have to concede that it’s very convenient![/quote]

    That’s more like the natural So Cal landscape before we started importing plants and irrigating.[/quote]

    Absolutely agree that if SD did not have irrigation, it would look just like many areas of TJ. SD is a glorified, heavily irrigated desert … on the ocean. Nothing more.

    July 26, 2011 at 11:05 AM #714193
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1][quote=bearishgurl]

    Even though the 52 has a lunar landscape, I have to concede that it’s very convenient![/quote]

    That’s more like the natural So Cal landscape before we started importing plants and irrigating.[/quote]

    Absolutely agree that if SD did not have irrigation, it would look just like many areas of TJ. SD is a glorified, heavily irrigated desert … on the ocean. Nothing more.

    July 26, 2011 at 3:03 PM #713065
    faterikcartman
    Participant

    [quote=bearishgurl]Absolutely agree that if SD did not have irrigation, it would look just like many areas of TJ. SD is a glorified, heavily irrigated desert … on the ocean. Nothing more.[/quote]

    Wow, I actually agree. San Diego is, technically, a desert. And we average less rain per year than Tucson Arizona. We have only one native tree. It is very revealing to look at very old early pictures of San Diego.

    July 26, 2011 at 3:03 PM #713158
    faterikcartman
    Participant

    [quote=bearishgurl]Absolutely agree that if SD did not have irrigation, it would look just like many areas of TJ. SD is a glorified, heavily irrigated desert … on the ocean. Nothing more.[/quote]

    Wow, I actually agree. San Diego is, technically, a desert. And we average less rain per year than Tucson Arizona. We have only one native tree. It is very revealing to look at very old early pictures of San Diego.

    July 26, 2011 at 3:03 PM #713755
    faterikcartman
    Participant

    [quote=bearishgurl]Absolutely agree that if SD did not have irrigation, it would look just like many areas of TJ. SD is a glorified, heavily irrigated desert … on the ocean. Nothing more.[/quote]

    Wow, I actually agree. San Diego is, technically, a desert. And we average less rain per year than Tucson Arizona. We have only one native tree. It is very revealing to look at very old early pictures of San Diego.

    July 26, 2011 at 3:03 PM #713908
    faterikcartman
    Participant

    [quote=bearishgurl]Absolutely agree that if SD did not have irrigation, it would look just like many areas of TJ. SD is a glorified, heavily irrigated desert … on the ocean. Nothing more.[/quote]

    Wow, I actually agree. San Diego is, technically, a desert. And we average less rain per year than Tucson Arizona. We have only one native tree. It is very revealing to look at very old early pictures of San Diego.

    July 26, 2011 at 3:03 PM #714265
    faterikcartman
    Participant

    [quote=bearishgurl]Absolutely agree that if SD did not have irrigation, it would look just like many areas of TJ. SD is a glorified, heavily irrigated desert … on the ocean. Nothing more.[/quote]

    Wow, I actually agree. San Diego is, technically, a desert. And we average less rain per year than Tucson Arizona. We have only one native tree. It is very revealing to look at very old early pictures of San Diego.

    July 26, 2011 at 3:14 PM #713075
    faterikcartman
    Participant

    I don’t think $5M would get me my dream in 92091 or 92067 so I would probably just build on a lot I already own in 92064 and save part of it to hire a live-in housekeeper.

    I’m not sure zip code, by the way, tells the whole story. There are corners of some zips that some folks never see that are a world of their own; The Heritage in 92064, for example.

    July 26, 2011 at 3:14 PM #713168
    faterikcartman
    Participant

    I don’t think $5M would get me my dream in 92091 or 92067 so I would probably just build on a lot I already own in 92064 and save part of it to hire a live-in housekeeper.

    I’m not sure zip code, by the way, tells the whole story. There are corners of some zips that some folks never see that are a world of their own; The Heritage in 92064, for example.

    July 26, 2011 at 3:14 PM #713765
    faterikcartman
    Participant

    I don’t think $5M would get me my dream in 92091 or 92067 so I would probably just build on a lot I already own in 92064 and save part of it to hire a live-in housekeeper.

    I’m not sure zip code, by the way, tells the whole story. There are corners of some zips that some folks never see that are a world of their own; The Heritage in 92064, for example.

    July 26, 2011 at 3:14 PM #713918
    faterikcartman
    Participant

    I don’t think $5M would get me my dream in 92091 or 92067 so I would probably just build on a lot I already own in 92064 and save part of it to hire a live-in housekeeper.

    I’m not sure zip code, by the way, tells the whole story. There are corners of some zips that some folks never see that are a world of their own; The Heritage in 92064, for example.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 166 total)
1 2 3 … 9 10 11 12
  • The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.