- This topic has 331 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 18 years ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:16 PM #106723December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106585
sdrealtor
ParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106682sdrealtor
ParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106714sdrealtor
ParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106721sdrealtor
ParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106743sdrealtor
ParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106611waiting for bottom
ParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways.December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106707waiting for bottom
ParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways.December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106739waiting for bottom
ParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways.December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106746waiting for bottom
ParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways.December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106765waiting for bottom
ParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways.December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106621svelte
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you.December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106717svelte
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you.December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106749svelte
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you.December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106756svelte
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
