- This topic has 331 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:16 PM #106723December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106585sdrealtorParticipant
I have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106682sdrealtorParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106714sdrealtorParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106721sdrealtorParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106743sdrealtorParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106611waiting for bottomParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways.December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106707waiting for bottomParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways.December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106739waiting for bottomParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways.December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106746waiting for bottomParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways.December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106765waiting for bottomParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways.December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106621svelteParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you.December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106717svelteParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you.December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106749svelteParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you.December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106756svelteParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.