- This topic has 184 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 6 months ago by
4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 20, 2007 at 5:17 PM #60879June 20, 2007 at 6:05 PM #60864
Anonymous
GuestFurther, the “greedy ex-wife” is probably spending more every month on the kids than she is receiving.
Indeed.
One might even entertain the notion that children are responsibility of two parents, even financially.
June 20, 2007 at 6:05 PM #60899GuestFurther, the “greedy ex-wife” is probably spending more every month on the kids than she is receiving.
Indeed.
One might even entertain the notion that children are responsibility of two parents, even financially.
June 20, 2007 at 9:11 PM #60860NotCranky
Participant“…you libs have harsh anti-American views”
“Same as it ever was – same logic that get’s regurgitated by neo-cons everywhere. Demonize the enemy is the way to win any debates.”
“Libs” will never win the debate when the mandatory political response by their alleged representative politician is.
” I am every bit American as you are I served in Vietnam, Korea ect.I am Christian.I love Freedom”
The Dems know they are not for “Americans” and the Republicans know they are not for “Americans” so they publically swap hyperbole and share power/gross access to opportunity forever. The joke is on us folks and more so on the rest of the world,but we don’t really care because we are still making pretty good imperial money.As long as both parties promise us a pretty good standard of living we will vote for one and keep on idly bickering about the bullshit they feed us. As long as we persist in taking one side with them or the other we are all lame ducks as far as any higher “American” ideals go. That is, in part,why we are so fat and drug addicted.June 20, 2007 at 9:11 PM #60895Participant“…you libs have harsh anti-American views”
“Same as it ever was – same logic that get’s regurgitated by neo-cons everywhere. Demonize the enemy is the way to win any debates.”
“Libs” will never win the debate when the mandatory political response by their alleged representative politician is.
” I am every bit American as you are I served in Vietnam, Korea ect.I am Christian.I love Freedom”
The Dems know they are not for “Americans” and the Republicans know they are not for “Americans” so they publically swap hyperbole and share power/gross access to opportunity forever. The joke is on us folks and more so on the rest of the world,but we don’t really care because we are still making pretty good imperial money.As long as both parties promise us a pretty good standard of living we will vote for one and keep on idly bickering about the bullshit they feed us. As long as we persist in taking one side with them or the other we are all lame ducks as far as any higher “American” ideals go. That is, in part,why we are so fat and drug addicted.June 20, 2007 at 9:17 PM #60896Guestlk, yes, it is a slow time of month, economic data-wise. Yes, I’m just biding my time until the market crashes.
Melt down soon, Bear Stearns!
It’s fun throwing red meat before you libs. Man, you folks have sharp teeth, claws, and elbows.
June 20, 2007 at 9:17 PM #60932Guestlk, yes, it is a slow time of month, economic data-wise. Yes, I’m just biding my time until the market crashes.
Melt down soon, Bear Stearns!
It’s fun throwing red meat before you libs. Man, you folks have sharp teeth, claws, and elbows.
June 20, 2007 at 9:31 PM #60898ParticipantADVERTISEMENT
Link did not work: It was about how some guy Parnell wants to show everyone how he turned 33k into 700k. Just trying to get back on topic.
June 20, 2007 at 9:31 PM #60934ParticipantADVERTISEMENT
Link did not work: It was about how some guy Parnell wants to show everyone how he turned 33k into 700k. Just trying to get back on topic.
June 21, 2007 at 2:49 AM #60921lostkitty
ParticipantWell, there you go realestatefan, jg admits that this is just ‘fun’.
I, for one, did not find this site by doing a search for Republican-Bullying-Religious-CountryClubMooching-Instigators. I could do without hearing his views on those topics.
However, I’ll never let those socially irresposible comments of his stand unchallenged, even if he is ‘just joking around’ having “fun throwing red meat before you ‘libs'”.
Now back to real estate, for at least a topic or two – thank you very much….June 21, 2007 at 2:49 AM #60958ParticipantWell, there you go realestatefan, jg admits that this is just ‘fun’.
I, for one, did not find this site by doing a search for Republican-Bullying-Religious-CountryClubMooching-Instigators. I could do without hearing his views on those topics.
However, I’ll never let those socially irresposible comments of his stand unchallenged, even if he is ‘just joking around’ having “fun throwing red meat before you ‘libs'”.
Now back to real estate, for at least a topic or two – thank you very much….June 21, 2007 at 11:50 AM #61031CardiffBaseball
ParticipantJG is like the one guy on here who posts a positive spin when people make asinine assumptions that most christians are either leading the charge on scamming, or else that most christians are trusting and gullible. I can’t figure out which one it is just yet. However since LK and others jump into the fray every time one of these things comes up, I’d rate the signal to noise ratio as about 5-1 the anti-american pro-frenchy (insert cuba, venezuela or whatever other flavor of the week) vs. the patriotic murricans.
So anyway JG resorts to name-calling because he says “anti-american”, but christians being either gullible or scammers…. No name-calling there.
June 21, 2007 at 11:50 AM #61069ParticipantJG is like the one guy on here who posts a positive spin when people make asinine assumptions that most christians are either leading the charge on scamming, or else that most christians are trusting and gullible. I can’t figure out which one it is just yet. However since LK and others jump into the fray every time one of these things comes up, I’d rate the signal to noise ratio as about 5-1 the anti-american pro-frenchy (insert cuba, venezuela or whatever other flavor of the week) vs. the patriotic murricans.
So anyway JG resorts to name-calling because he says “anti-american”, but christians being either gullible or scammers…. No name-calling there.
June 21, 2007 at 12:18 PM #61041PerryChase
ParticipantChristians are generally not anymore gullible or scammers than anyone else.
BUT the topic is relevant here because the core clients are using Christianity in their own defense.
Here’s a quote from their website:
“Coreclients Against Fraud are victims of an alleged Massive Real Estate/Mortgage/Currency Ponsi scheme spanning several states perpetrated by several people who claim to be ‘investment advisors’ and ‘real estate investors.’ They targeted active-duty/retired military, the church community, the retired and elderly, and the Filipino Community. They claimed that we would see financial independence in 3 years if we gave them control of our finances and trusted them (they claimed to be Christians).”In essence the core clients are saying that they trusted the scammers BECAUSE investors and scammers are Christians.
Rather than focusing on the scam itself, they use the fact that they are “active-duty/retired military, the church community, the retired and elderly, and the Filipino Community” to elicit sympathy.
It seems to me that the core client are admitting that they are “gullible” and that’s why they were easily duped because of religion. Would the core client have turned over their finances to the scammers if they were Muslim? I think not.
It’s not us, the libs, who are playing the religion card.
June 21, 2007 at 12:18 PM #61079ParticipantChristians are generally not anymore gullible or scammers than anyone else.
BUT the topic is relevant here because the core clients are using Christianity in their own defense.
Here’s a quote from their website:
“Coreclients Against Fraud are victims of an alleged Massive Real Estate/Mortgage/Currency Ponsi scheme spanning several states perpetrated by several people who claim to be ‘investment advisors’ and ‘real estate investors.’ They targeted active-duty/retired military, the church community, the retired and elderly, and the Filipino Community. They claimed that we would see financial independence in 3 years if we gave them control of our finances and trusted them (they claimed to be Christians).”In essence the core clients are saying that they trusted the scammers BECAUSE investors and scammers are Christians.
Rather than focusing on the scam itself, they use the fact that they are “active-duty/retired military, the church community, the retired and elderly, and the Filipino Community” to elicit sympathy.
It seems to me that the core client are admitting that they are “gullible” and that’s why they were easily duped because of religion. Would the core client have turned over their finances to the scammers if they were Muslim? I think not.
It’s not us, the libs, who are playing the religion card.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.