Menu

Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › MM 3/2 SFR sub 300k

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 150 total)
1 2 3 4 5 … 8 9 10
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 6, 2008 at 4:15 PM #300457
    nostradamus
    Participant

    By my calculations with 20% down at 6% you’d be paying in the area of $1600/month just for P&I + taxes. I guess if you’re saying taxes + upkeep are canceled out by tax rebate, you can go with a lower monthly cost.

    I still have to agree with FLU on this one. IMO the price has a way to drop.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:15 PM #300815
    nostradamus
    Participant

    By my calculations with 20% down at 6% you’d be paying in the area of $1600/month just for P&I + taxes. I guess if you’re saying taxes + upkeep are canceled out by tax rebate, you can go with a lower monthly cost.

    I still have to agree with FLU on this one. IMO the price has a way to drop.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:15 PM #300823
    nostradamus
    Participant

    By my calculations with 20% down at 6% you’d be paying in the area of $1600/month just for P&I + taxes. I guess if you’re saying taxes + upkeep are canceled out by tax rebate, you can go with a lower monthly cost.

    I still have to agree with FLU on this one. IMO the price has a way to drop.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:15 PM #300839
    nostradamus
    Participant

    By my calculations with 20% down at 6% you’d be paying in the area of $1600/month just for P&I + taxes. I guess if you’re saying taxes + upkeep are canceled out by tax rebate, you can go with a lower monthly cost.

    I still have to agree with FLU on this one. IMO the price has a way to drop.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:15 PM #300891
    nostradamus
    Participant

    By my calculations with 20% down at 6% you’d be paying in the area of $1600/month just for P&I + taxes. I guess if you’re saying taxes + upkeep are canceled out by tax rebate, you can go with a lower monthly cost.

    I still have to agree with FLU on this one. IMO the price has a way to drop.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:19 PM #300462
    nostradamus
    Participant

    BTW I’m still very skeptical of sales prices I see “officially” listed. I see so many erroneous listings, what’s to say the sales price isn’t wrong?

    Look at this one. $1000 for a Calle Cristobal condo.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:19 PM #300820
    nostradamus
    Participant

    BTW I’m still very skeptical of sales prices I see “officially” listed. I see so many erroneous listings, what’s to say the sales price isn’t wrong?

    Look at this one. $1000 for a Calle Cristobal condo.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:19 PM #300828
    nostradamus
    Participant

    BTW I’m still very skeptical of sales prices I see “officially” listed. I see so many erroneous listings, what’s to say the sales price isn’t wrong?

    Look at this one. $1000 for a Calle Cristobal condo.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:19 PM #300844
    nostradamus
    Participant

    BTW I’m still very skeptical of sales prices I see “officially” listed. I see so many erroneous listings, what’s to say the sales price isn’t wrong?

    Look at this one. $1000 for a Calle Cristobal condo.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:19 PM #300896
    nostradamus
    Participant

    BTW I’m still very skeptical of sales prices I see “officially” listed. I see so many erroneous listings, what’s to say the sales price isn’t wrong?

    Look at this one. $1000 for a Calle Cristobal condo.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:51 PM #300502
    an
    Participant

    By no mean do I think we’re at the bottom in Mira Mesa. All I’m saying is, it’s not “expensive”. Not expensive is not equal to bottom. I think it’s at fair price. It’s not cheap, but not expensive either.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:51 PM #300859
    an
    Participant

    By no mean do I think we’re at the bottom in Mira Mesa. All I’m saying is, it’s not “expensive”. Not expensive is not equal to bottom. I think it’s at fair price. It’s not cheap, but not expensive either.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:51 PM #300868
    an
    Participant

    By no mean do I think we’re at the bottom in Mira Mesa. All I’m saying is, it’s not “expensive”. Not expensive is not equal to bottom. I think it’s at fair price. It’s not cheap, but not expensive either.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:51 PM #300884
    an
    Participant

    By no mean do I think we’re at the bottom in Mira Mesa. All I’m saying is, it’s not “expensive”. Not expensive is not equal to bottom. I think it’s at fair price. It’s not cheap, but not expensive either.

    November 6, 2008 at 4:51 PM #300936
    an
    Participant

    By no mean do I think we’re at the bottom in Mira Mesa. All I’m saying is, it’s not “expensive”. Not expensive is not equal to bottom. I think it’s at fair price. It’s not cheap, but not expensive either.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 150 total)
1 2 3 4 5 … 8 9 10
  • The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.