Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Mira Mesa, Calle Cristobal house for under $500K
- This topic has 206 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
jimmyle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 25, 2008 at 4:33 PM #160150February 25, 2008 at 5:21 PM #159781
DWCAP
ParticipantNos, If i had to guess, it is because it is too much of a hassle to do. As was posted earlier in a different post the numbers being reported as NOD and NOT dont match those in the MLS. New code has sprung up to try to avoid those magic words which bring too many low ball offers. Code like “owner exempt from disclosure”, or similar. I see this alot in MM, clairmont and the “middle class” areas that are hosed. 6 months ago “short_sale” wasnt the bad word it is today.
February 25, 2008 at 5:21 PM #160079ParticipantNos, If i had to guess, it is because it is too much of a hassle to do. As was posted earlier in a different post the numbers being reported as NOD and NOT dont match those in the MLS. New code has sprung up to try to avoid those magic words which bring too many low ball offers. Code like “owner exempt from disclosure”, or similar. I see this alot in MM, clairmont and the “middle class” areas that are hosed. 6 months ago “short_sale” wasnt the bad word it is today.
February 25, 2008 at 5:21 PM #160094ParticipantNos, If i had to guess, it is because it is too much of a hassle to do. As was posted earlier in a different post the numbers being reported as NOD and NOT dont match those in the MLS. New code has sprung up to try to avoid those magic words which bring too many low ball offers. Code like “owner exempt from disclosure”, or similar. I see this alot in MM, clairmont and the “middle class” areas that are hosed. 6 months ago “short_sale” wasnt the bad word it is today.
February 25, 2008 at 5:21 PM #160097ParticipantNos, If i had to guess, it is because it is too much of a hassle to do. As was posted earlier in a different post the numbers being reported as NOD and NOT dont match those in the MLS. New code has sprung up to try to avoid those magic words which bring too many low ball offers. Code like “owner exempt from disclosure”, or similar. I see this alot in MM, clairmont and the “middle class” areas that are hosed. 6 months ago “short_sale” wasnt the bad word it is today.
February 25, 2008 at 5:21 PM #160175ParticipantNos, If i had to guess, it is because it is too much of a hassle to do. As was posted earlier in a different post the numbers being reported as NOD and NOT dont match those in the MLS. New code has sprung up to try to avoid those magic words which bring too many low ball offers. Code like “owner exempt from disclosure”, or similar. I see this alot in MM, clairmont and the “middle class” areas that are hosed. 6 months ago “short_sale” wasnt the bad word it is today.
February 25, 2008 at 5:53 PM #159798masayako
ParticipantSorry, this Mira Mesa house should not worth anything over $400k to begin with. Back in pre-bubble time, this house worth at most $250k. I am being serious. The house is small and not in a really good neighborhood.
February 25, 2008 at 5:53 PM #160091ParticipantSorry, this Mira Mesa house should not worth anything over $400k to begin with. Back in pre-bubble time, this house worth at most $250k. I am being serious. The house is small and not in a really good neighborhood.
February 25, 2008 at 5:53 PM #160108ParticipantSorry, this Mira Mesa house should not worth anything over $400k to begin with. Back in pre-bubble time, this house worth at most $250k. I am being serious. The house is small and not in a really good neighborhood.
February 25, 2008 at 5:53 PM #160113ParticipantSorry, this Mira Mesa house should not worth anything over $400k to begin with. Back in pre-bubble time, this house worth at most $250k. I am being serious. The house is small and not in a really good neighborhood.
February 25, 2008 at 5:53 PM #160190ParticipantSorry, this Mira Mesa house should not worth anything over $400k to begin with. Back in pre-bubble time, this house worth at most $250k. I am being serious. The house is small and not in a really good neighborhood.
February 25, 2008 at 6:14 PM #159817
CoronitaParticipantCan someone educate me on MM?
Where is it considered "good" and where is it considered "getto"?
Thanks.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
February 25, 2008 at 6:14 PM #160114CoronitaParticipantCan someone educate me on MM?
Where is it considered "good" and where is it considered "getto"?
Thanks.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
February 25, 2008 at 6:14 PM #160128CoronitaParticipantCan someone educate me on MM?
Where is it considered "good" and where is it considered "getto"?
Thanks.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
February 25, 2008 at 6:14 PM #160132CoronitaParticipantCan someone educate me on MM?
Where is it considered "good" and where is it considered "getto"?
Thanks.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.