- This topic has 200 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by Huckleberry.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 8, 2008 at 9:03 AM #14121October 8, 2008 at 9:19 AM #283253meadandaleParticipant
I agree. It’s nonsense. I don’t support either of them. Hopefully the next 4 years with Obama driving his socialist agenda is over quickly,.
October 8, 2008 at 9:19 AM #283537meadandaleParticipantI agree. It’s nonsense. I don’t support either of them. Hopefully the next 4 years with Obama driving his socialist agenda is over quickly,.
October 8, 2008 at 9:19 AM #283564meadandaleParticipantI agree. It’s nonsense. I don’t support either of them. Hopefully the next 4 years with Obama driving his socialist agenda is over quickly,.
October 8, 2008 at 9:19 AM #283580meadandaleParticipantI agree. It’s nonsense. I don’t support either of them. Hopefully the next 4 years with Obama driving his socialist agenda is over quickly,.
October 8, 2008 at 9:19 AM #283591meadandaleParticipantI agree. It’s nonsense. I don’t support either of them. Hopefully the next 4 years with Obama driving his socialist agenda is over quickly,.
October 8, 2008 at 9:31 AM #283258DWCAPParticipantI wanted to support him like I did back when it was him or the idiot cowboy. But I just cant. I have been having a crisis of voter confidence becauase I just CANT support this. I am looking for a 3rd part canadate, someone who actually deserves to be in office. I havnt found one yet, but maybe one more vote could be one more step to getting them federal funding and press exposure. I just really dont like voting AGAINST someone. The “I dont care who it is as long as it isnt him” voting scheme has way to many unforseen problems.
October 8, 2008 at 9:31 AM #283542DWCAPParticipantI wanted to support him like I did back when it was him or the idiot cowboy. But I just cant. I have been having a crisis of voter confidence becauase I just CANT support this. I am looking for a 3rd part canadate, someone who actually deserves to be in office. I havnt found one yet, but maybe one more vote could be one more step to getting them federal funding and press exposure. I just really dont like voting AGAINST someone. The “I dont care who it is as long as it isnt him” voting scheme has way to many unforseen problems.
October 8, 2008 at 9:31 AM #283569DWCAPParticipantI wanted to support him like I did back when it was him or the idiot cowboy. But I just cant. I have been having a crisis of voter confidence becauase I just CANT support this. I am looking for a 3rd part canadate, someone who actually deserves to be in office. I havnt found one yet, but maybe one more vote could be one more step to getting them federal funding and press exposure. I just really dont like voting AGAINST someone. The “I dont care who it is as long as it isnt him” voting scheme has way to many unforseen problems.
October 8, 2008 at 9:31 AM #283585DWCAPParticipantI wanted to support him like I did back when it was him or the idiot cowboy. But I just cant. I have been having a crisis of voter confidence becauase I just CANT support this. I am looking for a 3rd part canadate, someone who actually deserves to be in office. I havnt found one yet, but maybe one more vote could be one more step to getting them federal funding and press exposure. I just really dont like voting AGAINST someone. The “I dont care who it is as long as it isnt him” voting scheme has way to many unforseen problems.
October 8, 2008 at 9:31 AM #283596DWCAPParticipantI wanted to support him like I did back when it was him or the idiot cowboy. But I just cant. I have been having a crisis of voter confidence becauase I just CANT support this. I am looking for a 3rd part canadate, someone who actually deserves to be in office. I havnt found one yet, but maybe one more vote could be one more step to getting them federal funding and press exposure. I just really dont like voting AGAINST someone. The “I dont care who it is as long as it isnt him” voting scheme has way to many unforseen problems.
October 8, 2008 at 11:40 AM #283313poorgradstudentParticipantI’m eagerly awaiting for one of the candidates to say “Housing prices are too high, they need to fall to correct further and raise affordability”.
The McCain plan is the opposite of what I feel we need. Let the FBs lose their homes, and let’s start over.
October 8, 2008 at 11:40 AM #283597poorgradstudentParticipantI’m eagerly awaiting for one of the candidates to say “Housing prices are too high, they need to fall to correct further and raise affordability”.
The McCain plan is the opposite of what I feel we need. Let the FBs lose their homes, and let’s start over.
October 8, 2008 at 11:40 AM #283624poorgradstudentParticipantI’m eagerly awaiting for one of the candidates to say “Housing prices are too high, they need to fall to correct further and raise affordability”.
The McCain plan is the opposite of what I feel we need. Let the FBs lose their homes, and let’s start over.
October 8, 2008 at 11:40 AM #283641poorgradstudentParticipantI’m eagerly awaiting for one of the candidates to say “Housing prices are too high, they need to fall to correct further and raise affordability”.
The McCain plan is the opposite of what I feel we need. Let the FBs lose their homes, and let’s start over.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.