- This topic has 936 replies, 29 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by Rich Toscano.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 18, 2008 at 2:10 PM #242262July 18, 2008 at 2:10 PM #242269AnonymousGuest
Allan, move on! Go home, make somebody happy.
July 18, 2008 at 2:12 PM #242065surveyorParticipantdebates
While admittedly annoying, I think that debating sharpens the mind and forces you to think through your answers carefully. You will always have to defend your point of views through fact, reasoning, and history. (That’s the theory anyways). That’s the beauty of this American system. I forgot the person who said this, he said the American election system is not perfect, but it is excellent. Having to debate the issues and the worst thing that happens is an occasional name-calling is a pretty fine system compared to the rest of the world. I mean, think about it – we are debating which person is best suited to lead the country. There is no such pretense in most other countries, believe me.
Marion: You’ve established pretty well that you’re an Obama supporter and you believe him to be the best man for the job. Exactly how did you come to that realization? Most of the arguments that I (and Allan for that matter) have seen for supporting Obama have boiled down to the following:
a) Bush sucks
b) Bush sucks a lot
c) Bush is a warmonger
d) Obama is not Bush
e) You’re a neocon!Any good points of Obama that make him to you the most qualified to be President that deviate from the above list would be helpful points to argue on.
As for me being Chancellor, thank you Allan, but I am at least knowledgeable enough of myself to know that I am nowhere near qualified or able to rule. Unlike Barack Obama…
July 18, 2008 at 2:12 PM #242204surveyorParticipantdebates
While admittedly annoying, I think that debating sharpens the mind and forces you to think through your answers carefully. You will always have to defend your point of views through fact, reasoning, and history. (That’s the theory anyways). That’s the beauty of this American system. I forgot the person who said this, he said the American election system is not perfect, but it is excellent. Having to debate the issues and the worst thing that happens is an occasional name-calling is a pretty fine system compared to the rest of the world. I mean, think about it – we are debating which person is best suited to lead the country. There is no such pretense in most other countries, believe me.
Marion: You’ve established pretty well that you’re an Obama supporter and you believe him to be the best man for the job. Exactly how did you come to that realization? Most of the arguments that I (and Allan for that matter) have seen for supporting Obama have boiled down to the following:
a) Bush sucks
b) Bush sucks a lot
c) Bush is a warmonger
d) Obama is not Bush
e) You’re a neocon!Any good points of Obama that make him to you the most qualified to be President that deviate from the above list would be helpful points to argue on.
As for me being Chancellor, thank you Allan, but I am at least knowledgeable enough of myself to know that I am nowhere near qualified or able to rule. Unlike Barack Obama…
July 18, 2008 at 2:12 PM #242211surveyorParticipantdebates
While admittedly annoying, I think that debating sharpens the mind and forces you to think through your answers carefully. You will always have to defend your point of views through fact, reasoning, and history. (That’s the theory anyways). That’s the beauty of this American system. I forgot the person who said this, he said the American election system is not perfect, but it is excellent. Having to debate the issues and the worst thing that happens is an occasional name-calling is a pretty fine system compared to the rest of the world. I mean, think about it – we are debating which person is best suited to lead the country. There is no such pretense in most other countries, believe me.
Marion: You’ve established pretty well that you’re an Obama supporter and you believe him to be the best man for the job. Exactly how did you come to that realization? Most of the arguments that I (and Allan for that matter) have seen for supporting Obama have boiled down to the following:
a) Bush sucks
b) Bush sucks a lot
c) Bush is a warmonger
d) Obama is not Bush
e) You’re a neocon!Any good points of Obama that make him to you the most qualified to be President that deviate from the above list would be helpful points to argue on.
As for me being Chancellor, thank you Allan, but I am at least knowledgeable enough of myself to know that I am nowhere near qualified or able to rule. Unlike Barack Obama…
July 18, 2008 at 2:12 PM #242267surveyorParticipantdebates
While admittedly annoying, I think that debating sharpens the mind and forces you to think through your answers carefully. You will always have to defend your point of views through fact, reasoning, and history. (That’s the theory anyways). That’s the beauty of this American system. I forgot the person who said this, he said the American election system is not perfect, but it is excellent. Having to debate the issues and the worst thing that happens is an occasional name-calling is a pretty fine system compared to the rest of the world. I mean, think about it – we are debating which person is best suited to lead the country. There is no such pretense in most other countries, believe me.
Marion: You’ve established pretty well that you’re an Obama supporter and you believe him to be the best man for the job. Exactly how did you come to that realization? Most of the arguments that I (and Allan for that matter) have seen for supporting Obama have boiled down to the following:
a) Bush sucks
b) Bush sucks a lot
c) Bush is a warmonger
d) Obama is not Bush
e) You’re a neocon!Any good points of Obama that make him to you the most qualified to be President that deviate from the above list would be helpful points to argue on.
As for me being Chancellor, thank you Allan, but I am at least knowledgeable enough of myself to know that I am nowhere near qualified or able to rule. Unlike Barack Obama…
July 18, 2008 at 2:12 PM #242274surveyorParticipantdebates
While admittedly annoying, I think that debating sharpens the mind and forces you to think through your answers carefully. You will always have to defend your point of views through fact, reasoning, and history. (That’s the theory anyways). That’s the beauty of this American system. I forgot the person who said this, he said the American election system is not perfect, but it is excellent. Having to debate the issues and the worst thing that happens is an occasional name-calling is a pretty fine system compared to the rest of the world. I mean, think about it – we are debating which person is best suited to lead the country. There is no such pretense in most other countries, believe me.
Marion: You’ve established pretty well that you’re an Obama supporter and you believe him to be the best man for the job. Exactly how did you come to that realization? Most of the arguments that I (and Allan for that matter) have seen for supporting Obama have boiled down to the following:
a) Bush sucks
b) Bush sucks a lot
c) Bush is a warmonger
d) Obama is not Bush
e) You’re a neocon!Any good points of Obama that make him to you the most qualified to be President that deviate from the above list would be helpful points to argue on.
As for me being Chancellor, thank you Allan, but I am at least knowledgeable enough of myself to know that I am nowhere near qualified or able to rule. Unlike Barack Obama…
July 18, 2008 at 2:13 PM #242071AnonymousGuestWait, this is too much! My leg Bony? LOL. Um, you would be in the minority with that opinion, dude. You have GOT to know that. You are really, really angry and bitter. I’m sorry, you are. Pablo, do you even like women?..
Poor, Pablo.
Pablo meet Nostradamus. Nostradamus meet Pablo.
July 18, 2008 at 2:13 PM #242210AnonymousGuestWait, this is too much! My leg Bony? LOL. Um, you would be in the minority with that opinion, dude. You have GOT to know that. You are really, really angry and bitter. I’m sorry, you are. Pablo, do you even like women?..
Poor, Pablo.
Pablo meet Nostradamus. Nostradamus meet Pablo.
July 18, 2008 at 2:13 PM #242216AnonymousGuestWait, this is too much! My leg Bony? LOL. Um, you would be in the minority with that opinion, dude. You have GOT to know that. You are really, really angry and bitter. I’m sorry, you are. Pablo, do you even like women?..
Poor, Pablo.
Pablo meet Nostradamus. Nostradamus meet Pablo.
July 18, 2008 at 2:13 PM #242272AnonymousGuestWait, this is too much! My leg Bony? LOL. Um, you would be in the minority with that opinion, dude. You have GOT to know that. You are really, really angry and bitter. I’m sorry, you are. Pablo, do you even like women?..
Poor, Pablo.
Pablo meet Nostradamus. Nostradamus meet Pablo.
July 18, 2008 at 2:13 PM #242279AnonymousGuestWait, this is too much! My leg Bony? LOL. Um, you would be in the minority with that opinion, dude. You have GOT to know that. You are really, really angry and bitter. I’m sorry, you are. Pablo, do you even like women?..
Poor, Pablo.
Pablo meet Nostradamus. Nostradamus meet Pablo.
July 18, 2008 at 2:16 PM #242075AnonymousGuestsurveyor, you forgot f) YOU are an idiot.
July 18, 2008 at 2:16 PM #242214AnonymousGuestsurveyor, you forgot f) YOU are an idiot.
July 18, 2008 at 2:16 PM #242223AnonymousGuestsurveyor, you forgot f) YOU are an idiot.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.