- This topic has 70 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by Bob.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 2, 2009 at 11:48 PM #15808June 3, 2009 at 2:08 AM #409452CA renterParticipant
Wow. Idiot Zandi thinks “everyone” will benefit, huh? What about all the responsible people who didn’t take on more debt than they could handle? What about the renters or first-time buyers? What about the taxpayers?
Not everyone thinks rising housing costs are a good thing.
These moronic buyers are not responsible for their own decisions in Mr. Zandi’s world, I suppose. Let’s just take some more of that money off the taxpayer money tree and give it to all the losers who speculated in housing. They’re all “victims”!
What a complete idiot!
June 3, 2009 at 2:08 AM #410150CA renterParticipantWow. Idiot Zandi thinks “everyone” will benefit, huh? What about all the responsible people who didn’t take on more debt than they could handle? What about the renters or first-time buyers? What about the taxpayers?
Not everyone thinks rising housing costs are a good thing.
These moronic buyers are not responsible for their own decisions in Mr. Zandi’s world, I suppose. Let’s just take some more of that money off the taxpayer money tree and give it to all the losers who speculated in housing. They’re all “victims”!
What a complete idiot!
June 3, 2009 at 2:08 AM #409999CA renterParticipantWow. Idiot Zandi thinks “everyone” will benefit, huh? What about all the responsible people who didn’t take on more debt than they could handle? What about the renters or first-time buyers? What about the taxpayers?
Not everyone thinks rising housing costs are a good thing.
These moronic buyers are not responsible for their own decisions in Mr. Zandi’s world, I suppose. Let’s just take some more of that money off the taxpayer money tree and give it to all the losers who speculated in housing. They’re all “victims”!
What a complete idiot!
June 3, 2009 at 2:08 AM #409937CA renterParticipantWow. Idiot Zandi thinks “everyone” will benefit, huh? What about all the responsible people who didn’t take on more debt than they could handle? What about the renters or first-time buyers? What about the taxpayers?
Not everyone thinks rising housing costs are a good thing.
These moronic buyers are not responsible for their own decisions in Mr. Zandi’s world, I suppose. Let’s just take some more of that money off the taxpayer money tree and give it to all the losers who speculated in housing. They’re all “victims”!
What a complete idiot!
June 3, 2009 at 2:08 AM #409691CA renterParticipantWow. Idiot Zandi thinks “everyone” will benefit, huh? What about all the responsible people who didn’t take on more debt than they could handle? What about the renters or first-time buyers? What about the taxpayers?
Not everyone thinks rising housing costs are a good thing.
These moronic buyers are not responsible for their own decisions in Mr. Zandi’s world, I suppose. Let’s just take some more of that money off the taxpayer money tree and give it to all the losers who speculated in housing. They’re all “victims”!
What a complete idiot!
June 3, 2009 at 2:09 AM #409696danthedartParticipantInherently fair?
What a joke. Take this example:
2 people bought a home in 2005 in the same neighborhood for the same price 600k lets say. It’s worth only 400k now.
Person A makes 300k a year and person B makes only 70k a year. Person B gets a principle reduction and person A does not under Zandi’s plan.
June 3, 2009 at 2:09 AM #410004danthedartParticipantInherently fair?
What a joke. Take this example:
2 people bought a home in 2005 in the same neighborhood for the same price 600k lets say. It’s worth only 400k now.
Person A makes 300k a year and person B makes only 70k a year. Person B gets a principle reduction and person A does not under Zandi’s plan.
June 3, 2009 at 2:09 AM #409942danthedartParticipantInherently fair?
What a joke. Take this example:
2 people bought a home in 2005 in the same neighborhood for the same price 600k lets say. It’s worth only 400k now.
Person A makes 300k a year and person B makes only 70k a year. Person B gets a principle reduction and person A does not under Zandi’s plan.
June 3, 2009 at 2:09 AM #409457danthedartParticipantInherently fair?
What a joke. Take this example:
2 people bought a home in 2005 in the same neighborhood for the same price 600k lets say. It’s worth only 400k now.
Person A makes 300k a year and person B makes only 70k a year. Person B gets a principle reduction and person A does not under Zandi’s plan.
June 3, 2009 at 2:09 AM #410155danthedartParticipantInherently fair?
What a joke. Take this example:
2 people bought a home in 2005 in the same neighborhood for the same price 600k lets say. It’s worth only 400k now.
Person A makes 300k a year and person B makes only 70k a year. Person B gets a principle reduction and person A does not under Zandi’s plan.
June 3, 2009 at 7:39 AM #409982kev374Participantthis makes no sense whatsoever, this guy is an absolute moron…but I am afraid the Obama administration may do just this!
June 3, 2009 at 7:39 AM #409497kev374Participantthis makes no sense whatsoever, this guy is an absolute moron…but I am afraid the Obama administration may do just this!
June 3, 2009 at 7:39 AM #410044kev374Participantthis makes no sense whatsoever, this guy is an absolute moron…but I am afraid the Obama administration may do just this!
June 3, 2009 at 7:39 AM #410195kev374Participantthis makes no sense whatsoever, this guy is an absolute moron…but I am afraid the Obama administration may do just this!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.