- This topic has 51 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 12 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 29, 2007 at 3:41 PM #105236November 29, 2007 at 4:08 PM #105345BoratParticipant
In Kazakhstan it is better to buy than rent womens. For example, a woman of strong leg and backs with only 50% hair covering can be had for only 600000 Kazakhi kizbeks. That is about 47 dollars in U S of A. Tomorrow it will be only 45 dollars at exchange rate with Kazakhi inflation so maybe wait before buying is good idea.
Oh and you will probably want to buy cage to prevent womens from escaping. These are kind of expensive, maybe 75000 Kizbeks. But it is good insurance and most Kazakhi womens-owners have cage.
November 29, 2007 at 4:08 PM #105347BoratParticipantIn Kazakhstan it is better to buy than rent womens. For example, a woman of strong leg and backs with only 50% hair covering can be had for only 600000 Kazakhi kizbeks. That is about 47 dollars in U S of A. Tomorrow it will be only 45 dollars at exchange rate with Kazakhi inflation so maybe wait before buying is good idea.
Oh and you will probably want to buy cage to prevent womens from escaping. These are kind of expensive, maybe 75000 Kizbeks. But it is good insurance and most Kazakhi womens-owners have cage.
November 29, 2007 at 4:08 PM #105379BoratParticipantIn Kazakhstan it is better to buy than rent womens. For example, a woman of strong leg and backs with only 50% hair covering can be had for only 600000 Kazakhi kizbeks. That is about 47 dollars in U S of A. Tomorrow it will be only 45 dollars at exchange rate with Kazakhi inflation so maybe wait before buying is good idea.
Oh and you will probably want to buy cage to prevent womens from escaping. These are kind of expensive, maybe 75000 Kizbeks. But it is good insurance and most Kazakhi womens-owners have cage.
November 29, 2007 at 4:08 PM #105256BoratParticipantIn Kazakhstan it is better to buy than rent womens. For example, a woman of strong leg and backs with only 50% hair covering can be had for only 600000 Kazakhi kizbeks. That is about 47 dollars in U S of A. Tomorrow it will be only 45 dollars at exchange rate with Kazakhi inflation so maybe wait before buying is good idea.
Oh and you will probably want to buy cage to prevent womens from escaping. These are kind of expensive, maybe 75000 Kizbeks. But it is good insurance and most Kazakhi womens-owners have cage.
November 29, 2007 at 4:08 PM #105404BoratParticipantIn Kazakhstan it is better to buy than rent womens. For example, a woman of strong leg and backs with only 50% hair covering can be had for only 600000 Kazakhi kizbeks. That is about 47 dollars in U S of A. Tomorrow it will be only 45 dollars at exchange rate with Kazakhi inflation so maybe wait before buying is good idea.
Oh and you will probably want to buy cage to prevent womens from escaping. These are kind of expensive, maybe 75000 Kizbeks. But it is good insurance and most Kazakhi womens-owners have cage.
November 29, 2007 at 7:29 PM #105478KIBUParticipantBorat, that post kept me laughing for 15 minutes. You must be at least a relative of the guy Borat. You guys must come from the same village or something….
November 29, 2007 at 7:29 PM #105422KIBUParticipantBorat, that post kept me laughing for 15 minutes. You must be at least a relative of the guy Borat. You guys must come from the same village or something….
November 29, 2007 at 7:29 PM #105454KIBUParticipantBorat, that post kept me laughing for 15 minutes. You must be at least a relative of the guy Borat. You guys must come from the same village or something….
November 29, 2007 at 7:29 PM #105420KIBUParticipantBorat, that post kept me laughing for 15 minutes. You must be at least a relative of the guy Borat. You guys must come from the same village or something….
November 29, 2007 at 7:29 PM #105331KIBUParticipantBorat, that post kept me laughing for 15 minutes. You must be at least a relative of the guy Borat. You guys must come from the same village or something….
November 29, 2007 at 8:59 PM #105519AnonymousGuestMichael, you’ve either misunderstood why I posted my recent thread on here or this is your pitiful attempt at being humorous.
I’m not looking for a “sugar daddy”. That is why I went back to school so that I would never have to be in the position of needing a second income by a significant other to live well. By the way, the “hottie” in your post has nothing but her looks to fall back on. I have my education and earning potential.
That said, I’m not looking to “marry up”. Why? Let me explain: That perspective is never wise because money, in and of itself, will never make a normal, well-adjusted person happy. Understand? However, that doesn’t mean I don’t expect my ex-husband to own up to his responsibility concerning his children. That’s the law.
I can understand how that makes a number of you men bitter. But honestly, quit whining, be a man, and own up to your responsibility. Also, choose your mates more wisely if you want to avoid women like you posted about above. That comes about by thinking with your brain instead of…something else. It never fails to get the weaker and less intelligent of the male species into trouble. Live and learn!
November 29, 2007 at 8:59 PM #105370AnonymousGuestMichael, you’ve either misunderstood why I posted my recent thread on here or this is your pitiful attempt at being humorous.
I’m not looking for a “sugar daddy”. That is why I went back to school so that I would never have to be in the position of needing a second income by a significant other to live well. By the way, the “hottie” in your post has nothing but her looks to fall back on. I have my education and earning potential.
That said, I’m not looking to “marry up”. Why? Let me explain: That perspective is never wise because money, in and of itself, will never make a normal, well-adjusted person happy. Understand? However, that doesn’t mean I don’t expect my ex-husband to own up to his responsibility concerning his children. That’s the law.
I can understand how that makes a number of you men bitter. But honestly, quit whining, be a man, and own up to your responsibility. Also, choose your mates more wisely if you want to avoid women like you posted about above. That comes about by thinking with your brain instead of…something else. It never fails to get the weaker and less intelligent of the male species into trouble. Live and learn!
November 29, 2007 at 8:59 PM #105461AnonymousGuestMichael, you’ve either misunderstood why I posted my recent thread on here or this is your pitiful attempt at being humorous.
I’m not looking for a “sugar daddy”. That is why I went back to school so that I would never have to be in the position of needing a second income by a significant other to live well. By the way, the “hottie” in your post has nothing but her looks to fall back on. I have my education and earning potential.
That said, I’m not looking to “marry up”. Why? Let me explain: That perspective is never wise because money, in and of itself, will never make a normal, well-adjusted person happy. Understand? However, that doesn’t mean I don’t expect my ex-husband to own up to his responsibility concerning his children. That’s the law.
I can understand how that makes a number of you men bitter. But honestly, quit whining, be a man, and own up to your responsibility. Also, choose your mates more wisely if you want to avoid women like you posted about above. That comes about by thinking with your brain instead of…something else. It never fails to get the weaker and less intelligent of the male species into trouble. Live and learn!
November 29, 2007 at 8:59 PM #105462AnonymousGuestMichael, you’ve either misunderstood why I posted my recent thread on here or this is your pitiful attempt at being humorous.
I’m not looking for a “sugar daddy”. That is why I went back to school so that I would never have to be in the position of needing a second income by a significant other to live well. By the way, the “hottie” in your post has nothing but her looks to fall back on. I have my education and earning potential.
That said, I’m not looking to “marry up”. Why? Let me explain: That perspective is never wise because money, in and of itself, will never make a normal, well-adjusted person happy. Understand? However, that doesn’t mean I don’t expect my ex-husband to own up to his responsibility concerning his children. That’s the law.
I can understand how that makes a number of you men bitter. But honestly, quit whining, be a man, and own up to your responsibility. Also, choose your mates more wisely if you want to avoid women like you posted about above. That comes about by thinking with your brain instead of…something else. It never fails to get the weaker and less intelligent of the male species into trouble. Live and learn!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.