- This topic has 115 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 9 months ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 7, 2013 at 9:14 AM #20509February 7, 2013 at 10:08 AM #758891
spdrun
ParticipantThe trigger-happy cretins who shot the innocent people would be strung up Iranian-style on the courthouse lawn in a just world. Good example for cops to be more careful in future and not engage in Crip-style drivebys.
As to the cop who set this thing off, he should be happy to know that they treat ex-cops reeeeealy well in the klink.
February 7, 2013 at 10:31 AM #758892no_such_reality
ParticipantHe isn’t going to the klink.
Looks like Point Loma may be the final stand. (If they’ve got the right ID)
Egads, I think I just saw the TV feed on the LATimes site and one of the newscaster is opining that if you have a dark truck you should think about taking an alternate vehicle today…
February 7, 2013 at 10:46 AM #758893ucodegen
ParticipantLooks like people have more to fear from crazed (ex)cops with guns than criminals with guns right now… (and you can add scared cops with guns who shoot first check second to that list as well — one of the two LA mistake shootings was done in the victims back)
February 7, 2013 at 10:55 AM #758894ParticipantLooks pretty hard to explain, IMHO. This is the women’s truck.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef017d40da0bf1970c-640wi
February 7, 2013 at 11:00 AM #758895Participant(and you can add scared cops with guns who shoot first check second to that list as well — one of the two LA mistake shootings was done in the victims back)
Scared cops? Trigger-happy baboons. Can’t handle the job, don’t take it. They deserve all of the lawsuits that are no doubt coming their way.
February 7, 2013 at 11:03 AM #758896Participant[quote=spdrun]
(and you can add scared cops with guns who shoot first check second to that list as well — one of the two LA mistake shootings was done in the victims back)
Scared cops? Trigger-happy baboons. Can’t handle the job, don’t take it. They deserve all of the lawsuits that are no doubt coming their way.[/quote]Both scared cops and trigger-happy baboons are a problem. The trigger-happy baboons don’t check second after shooting first.. they shoot second and third and then claim that they were scared for their life and that an unarmed person was threatening to their safety and looked like they were holding a weapon.
February 7, 2013 at 11:08 AM #758897ParticipantHopefully, a jury won’t agree and will bankrupt their sorry asses into homelessness. At least the area has a nice, warm, climate for sleeping under a bridge.
February 7, 2013 at 11:10 AM #758898Participant[quote=spdrun]Hopefully, a jury won’t agree and will bankrupt their sorry asses into homelessness. At least the area has a nice, warm, climate for sleeping under a bridge.[/quote]The problem is that the attorneys for the cops that shot the innocent people are paid for by citizens of California.. because it was done in the process of their normal job. Unless there is extreme negligence, which is rarely found, they are literally immune from prosecution.
February 7, 2013 at 11:17 AM #758899ParticipantNot immune from a relative of the people who were shot pumping a few rounds into their kneecaps after the whole thing is long forgotten. Just enough damage to cripple for life, not kill of course.
February 7, 2013 at 11:21 AM #758900Participant[quote=spdrun]Not immune from a relative of the people who were shot pumping a few rounds into their kneecaps after the whole thing is long forgotten. Just enough damage to cripple for life, not kill of course.[/quote]You forgot enhanced gun control.. If the relatives do not already have a firearm, do you think the background check will now allow them to purchase one? Particularly if you consider that they have a ‘grievance’ against the police.
If they already have one, don’t you think that there may be a ‘pretense’ to confiscate? California will confiscate your firearms if you are convicted of misdemeanor battery.
February 7, 2013 at 11:25 AM #758901ParticipantUh, if someone is bent on doing something illegal, do you think they’ll be so worried about buying a gun (or fire-axe, or iron pipe) legally? Come on.
Personally, I hope that the baboons get the book thrown at them legally, so it doesn’t come to someone resorting to vigilantism.
Lastly, why does it always seem to be a dept in California? From what I read, LAPD, Oakland, and BART-PD have 2x to 3x the officer-involved shooting rate of the NYPD.
February 7, 2013 at 11:36 AM #758902Participant[quote=spdrun]Uh, if someone is bent on doing something illegal, do you think they’ll be so worried about buying a gun (or fire-axe, or iron pipe) legally? Come on.[/quote]
True.. which is why I think the whole gun-control argument is stupid. If these people are law abiding, it is harder to get the weapons because they do not have the contacts into that ‘side’ of society.. but eventually they may develop them. Because they may not already have the contacts to purchase an illegal weapon, they may be trapped in a sting on illegal weapon purchases… almost like how people soliciting for murder are caught. (In a way, getting shafted twice)[quote=spdrun]Personally, I hope that the baboons get the book thrown at them legally, so it doesn’t come to someone resorting to vigilantism.[/quote]Ditto..
[quote=spdrun]Lastly, why does it always seem to be a dept in California? From what I read, LAPD, Oakland, and BART-PD have 2x to 3x the officer-involved shooting rate of the NYPD.[/quote]I don’t know about the numbers.. I have always heard that NYPDs rate is higher. Either way, any abuse of authority by law enforcement is extremely wrong and should be dealt with very severely.
February 7, 2013 at 11:50 AM #758903PCinSD
GuestFrom his manifesto:
“I will conduct DA operations to destroy, exploit and seize designated targets. If unsuccessful or unable to meet objectives in these initial small-scale offensive actions, I will reassess my BDA and re-attack until objectives are met. I have nothing to lose. My personal casualty means nothing. Just alike AAF’s, ACM’s, and AIF’s, you can not prevail against an enemy combatant who has no fear of death. An enemy who embraces death is a lose, lose situation for their enemy combatants.
Hopefully you analyst have done your homework. You are aware that I have always been the top shot, highest score, an expert in rifle qualifications in every unit I’ve been in. I will utilize every bit of small arms training, demolition, ordnance, and survival training I’ve been given.
Do you know why we are unsuccessful in asymmetrical and guerrilla warfare in CENTCOM theatre of operations? I’ll tell you. It’s not the inefficiency of our combatant commanders, planning, readiness or training of troops. Much like the Vietnam war, ACM, AAF, foreign fighters, Jihadist, and JAM have nothing to lose. They embrace death as it is a way of life. I simply don’t fear it. I am the walking exigent circumstance you created.
The Violence of action will be HIGH. I am the reason TAC alert was established. I will bring unconventional and asymmetrical warfare to those in LAPD uniform whether on or off duty. ISR is my strength and your weakness. You will now live the life of the prey. Your RD’s and homes away from work will be my AO and battle space. I will utilize every tool within INT collections that I learned from NMITC in Dam Neck. You have misjudged a sleeping giant.
There is no conventional threat assessment for me. JAM, New Ba’ath party, 1920 rev BGE, ACM, AAF, AQAP, AQIM and AQIZ have nothing on me. Do not deploy airships or gunships. SA-7 Manpads will be waiting. As you know I also own Barrett .50′s so your APC are defunct and futile.
You better have all your officers radio/phone muster (code 1) on or off duty every hour, on the hour.
Do not attempt to shadow or conduct any type of ISR on me. I have the inventory listing of all UC vehicles at Piper Tech and the home addresses of any INT analyst at JRIC and detachment locations. My POA is always POI and always true. This will be a war of attrition and a Pyrrhic and Camdean Victory for myself. You may have the resources and manpower but you are reactive and predictable in your op plans and TTP’s. I have the strength and benefits of being unpredictable, unconventional, and unforgiving. Do not waste your time with briefs and tabletops.”February 7, 2013 at 12:52 PM #758904moneymaker
Participant[quote=no_such_reality]Looks pretty hard to explain, IMHO. This is the women’s truck.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef017d40da0bf1970c-640wi%5B/quote%5D
Absolutely horrible groupings, they should be ashamed!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.