- This topic has 90 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 1, 2010 at 10:08 AM #507669February 1, 2010 at 10:42 AM #507811briansd1Guest
[quote=CA renter]
Brian,
Do you really believe all the tripe you post about women, or are you trolling? π
[/quote]CA renter, of course I do believe it all — only in the context of the response to “Wifes values ‘roots/community’ more than money!!!”
A stereotypical post deserves a stereotypical response, just for fun.
[quote=CA renter]
Just so you know, the bubble blogs, this one included, are populated largely by women (perhaps 50% or so). Many of us were the ones who had to convince our husbands to rent instead of buy. You have some funny notions about women, men, and relationships.[/quote]There is hope after all. π We are making step by step progress. π
February 1, 2010 at 10:42 AM #508572briansd1Guest[quote=CA renter]
Brian,
Do you really believe all the tripe you post about women, or are you trolling? π
[/quote]CA renter, of course I do believe it all — only in the context of the response to “Wifes values ‘roots/community’ more than money!!!”
A stereotypical post deserves a stereotypical response, just for fun.
[quote=CA renter]
Just so you know, the bubble blogs, this one included, are populated largely by women (perhaps 50% or so). Many of us were the ones who had to convince our husbands to rent instead of buy. You have some funny notions about women, men, and relationships.[/quote]There is hope after all. π We are making step by step progress. π
February 1, 2010 at 10:42 AM #507664briansd1Guest[quote=CA renter]
Brian,
Do you really believe all the tripe you post about women, or are you trolling? π
[/quote]CA renter, of course I do believe it all — only in the context of the response to “Wifes values ‘roots/community’ more than money!!!”
A stereotypical post deserves a stereotypical response, just for fun.
[quote=CA renter]
Just so you know, the bubble blogs, this one included, are populated largely by women (perhaps 50% or so). Many of us were the ones who had to convince our husbands to rent instead of buy. You have some funny notions about women, men, and relationships.[/quote]There is hope after all. π We are making step by step progress. π
February 1, 2010 at 10:42 AM #508222briansd1Guest[quote=CA renter]
Brian,
Do you really believe all the tripe you post about women, or are you trolling? π
[/quote]CA renter, of course I do believe it all — only in the context of the response to “Wifes values ‘roots/community’ more than money!!!”
A stereotypical post deserves a stereotypical response, just for fun.
[quote=CA renter]
Just so you know, the bubble blogs, this one included, are populated largely by women (perhaps 50% or so). Many of us were the ones who had to convince our husbands to rent instead of buy. You have some funny notions about women, men, and relationships.[/quote]There is hope after all. π We are making step by step progress. π
February 1, 2010 at 10:42 AM #508316briansd1Guest[quote=CA renter]
Brian,
Do you really believe all the tripe you post about women, or are you trolling? π
[/quote]CA renter, of course I do believe it all — only in the context of the response to “Wifes values ‘roots/community’ more than money!!!”
A stereotypical post deserves a stereotypical response, just for fun.
[quote=CA renter]
Just so you know, the bubble blogs, this one included, are populated largely by women (perhaps 50% or so). Many of us were the ones who had to convince our husbands to rent instead of buy. You have some funny notions about women, men, and relationships.[/quote]There is hope after all. π We are making step by step progress. π
February 2, 2010 at 1:11 PM #508075urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=scaredycat]I don’t remember seeing articles on the frontpage of websites like this 5 years ago:
is this a trend indicator?[/quote]
So its not an original comment but I really think these articles should have been more common 5 years ago.
February 2, 2010 at 1:11 PM #508983urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=scaredycat]I don’t remember seeing articles on the frontpage of websites like this 5 years ago:
is this a trend indicator?[/quote]
So its not an original comment but I really think these articles should have been more common 5 years ago.
February 2, 2010 at 1:11 PM #508223urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=scaredycat]I don’t remember seeing articles on the frontpage of websites like this 5 years ago:
is this a trend indicator?[/quote]
So its not an original comment but I really think these articles should have been more common 5 years ago.
February 2, 2010 at 1:11 PM #508635urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=scaredycat]I don’t remember seeing articles on the frontpage of websites like this 5 years ago:
is this a trend indicator?[/quote]
So its not an original comment but I really think these articles should have been more common 5 years ago.
February 2, 2010 at 1:11 PM #508727urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=scaredycat]I don’t remember seeing articles on the frontpage of websites like this 5 years ago:
is this a trend indicator?[/quote]
So its not an original comment but I really think these articles should have been more common 5 years ago.
February 2, 2010 at 1:59 PM #509048DWCAPParticipantSo, is this a tact way of saying there is something to this formula? Cause 17 posts later I still dont see one of the standard ‘it is different here’ rationals being used to discredit this.
Best I can figure, Median SD income is right around 70k (http://www.sandag.org/resources/demographics_and_other_data/demographics/fastfacts/sand.htm)
And average interest rates are right around 5%. (http://signonsandiego.interest.com/)
SO….
70k*4.3466= 304262. Obviously this isnt perfect because interest rates move daily and layoffs/hires effect the job market, but add a +/- 5% so between 290k and 320k seem reasonable?
If so then we could, atleast in theory, compute what an interest rate surge would do to housing prices.
4.75% would =313k
5.50% would =288k
5.75% would =280k
6.00% would =272kBasically every .25% would be 8k in housing price movement.
February 2, 2010 at 1:59 PM #508794DWCAPParticipantSo, is this a tact way of saying there is something to this formula? Cause 17 posts later I still dont see one of the standard ‘it is different here’ rationals being used to discredit this.
Best I can figure, Median SD income is right around 70k (http://www.sandag.org/resources/demographics_and_other_data/demographics/fastfacts/sand.htm)
And average interest rates are right around 5%. (http://signonsandiego.interest.com/)
SO….
70k*4.3466= 304262. Obviously this isnt perfect because interest rates move daily and layoffs/hires effect the job market, but add a +/- 5% so between 290k and 320k seem reasonable?
If so then we could, atleast in theory, compute what an interest rate surge would do to housing prices.
4.75% would =313k
5.50% would =288k
5.75% would =280k
6.00% would =272kBasically every .25% would be 8k in housing price movement.
February 2, 2010 at 1:59 PM #508700DWCAPParticipantSo, is this a tact way of saying there is something to this formula? Cause 17 posts later I still dont see one of the standard ‘it is different here’ rationals being used to discredit this.
Best I can figure, Median SD income is right around 70k (http://www.sandag.org/resources/demographics_and_other_data/demographics/fastfacts/sand.htm)
And average interest rates are right around 5%. (http://signonsandiego.interest.com/)
SO….
70k*4.3466= 304262. Obviously this isnt perfect because interest rates move daily and layoffs/hires effect the job market, but add a +/- 5% so between 290k and 320k seem reasonable?
If so then we could, atleast in theory, compute what an interest rate surge would do to housing prices.
4.75% would =313k
5.50% would =288k
5.75% would =280k
6.00% would =272kBasically every .25% would be 8k in housing price movement.
February 2, 2010 at 1:59 PM #508140DWCAPParticipantSo, is this a tact way of saying there is something to this formula? Cause 17 posts later I still dont see one of the standard ‘it is different here’ rationals being used to discredit this.
Best I can figure, Median SD income is right around 70k (http://www.sandag.org/resources/demographics_and_other_data/demographics/fastfacts/sand.htm)
And average interest rates are right around 5%. (http://signonsandiego.interest.com/)
SO….
70k*4.3466= 304262. Obviously this isnt perfect because interest rates move daily and layoffs/hires effect the job market, but add a +/- 5% so between 290k and 320k seem reasonable?
If so then we could, atleast in theory, compute what an interest rate surge would do to housing prices.
4.75% would =313k
5.50% would =288k
5.75% would =280k
6.00% would =272kBasically every .25% would be 8k in housing price movement.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.