Home › Forums › Housing › Looks like some of the Carmel Valley Condo Crackheads are starting to sober (slightly)
- This topic has 35 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by Bugs.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 1, 2007 at 11:11 PM #9193June 1, 2007 at 11:41 PM #56064CoronitaParticipant
Duh, I meant attached townhomes…not detached townhomes.
June 1, 2007 at 11:41 PM #56083CoronitaParticipantDuh, I meant attached townhomes…not detached townhomes.
June 2, 2007 at 9:09 AM #56068LookoutBelowParticipantAnd NOW begins the "race to the bottom"….Recent buyers/flippers will experience a fiery re-entry back to reality……
June 2, 2007 at 9:09 AM #56087LookoutBelowParticipantAnd NOW begins the "race to the bottom"….Recent buyers/flippers will experience a fiery re-entry back to reality……
June 2, 2007 at 9:31 AM #56074barnaby33ParticipantIs there such a thing as a detached townhome? I just assume those are SFR’s.
Josh
June 2, 2007 at 9:31 AM #56093barnaby33ParticipantIs there such a thing as a detached townhome? I just assume those are SFR’s.
Josh
June 2, 2007 at 10:43 AM #56076temeculaguyParticipantActually there is something that can be referred to as a detached condo/townhome and they are becoming more prevelent. The lots are too small for SFR setback rules, the front yards are owned and sometimes maintained by the association, but they are not attached. A lot of alley homes/shared driveway homes are technically a condo or hybrid. If the lot is smaller than 4k sq. ft. the odds are it is a detached condo.
June 2, 2007 at 10:43 AM #56095temeculaguyParticipantActually there is something that can be referred to as a detached condo/townhome and they are becoming more prevelent. The lots are too small for SFR setback rules, the front yards are owned and sometimes maintained by the association, but they are not attached. A lot of alley homes/shared driveway homes are technically a condo or hybrid. If the lot is smaller than 4k sq. ft. the odds are it is a detached condo.
June 2, 2007 at 3:47 PM #56116CAwiremanParticipantFat lazy union,
The more of these I can show my wife, the better. Please keep these coming!
Yes, a friend of mine and his wife lived in new-ish detached
Town complex in Mira Mesa close to the 15 and Mira Mesa blvd.While better in terms of privacy than attached units, they were still pretty cozey.
Sincerely yours, HiggyBaby
June 2, 2007 at 3:47 PM #56135CAwiremanParticipantFat lazy union,
The more of these I can show my wife, the better. Please keep these coming!
Yes, a friend of mine and his wife lived in new-ish detached
Town complex in Mira Mesa close to the 15 and Mira Mesa blvd.While better in terms of privacy than attached units, they were still pretty cozey.
Sincerely yours, HiggyBaby
June 2, 2007 at 11:59 PM #56152CoronitaParticipantTemeculaguy, read my reply to myself (first entry). I corrected myself. I meant “attached” instead of “detached”. I would have corrected my initial post, but you can’t.
June 2, 2007 at 11:59 PM #56171CoronitaParticipantTemeculaguy, read my reply to myself (first entry). I corrected myself. I meant “attached” instead of “detached”. I would have corrected my initial post, but you can’t.
June 3, 2007 at 9:49 AM #56172SD RealtorParticipantfat_lazy –
Did you see the Crest listing for 540k? I went to a listing appt with this seller and recommended a much lower selling price. She did not list with me because she was told by her Zip Realty agent that she should have no problem getting 540k. If you look at the sales comps for that floorplan they do not come close to meeting that price.
SD Realtor
June 3, 2007 at 9:49 AM #56191SD RealtorParticipantfat_lazy –
Did you see the Crest listing for 540k? I went to a listing appt with this seller and recommended a much lower selling price. She did not list with me because she was told by her Zip Realty agent that she should have no problem getting 540k. If you look at the sales comps for that floorplan they do not come close to meeting that price.
SD Realtor
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.