- This topic has 165 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 18, 2009 at 8:39 PM #496345December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM #495483bsrsharmaParticipant
The article is very biased. Lots of people can’t afford private automobiles and live with that. Expecting society to turn a blind eye when motor vehicle laws are being violated is not asking for mercy. When a driver without insurance causes an accident, it is quite painful. It is better if those who can’t afford insurance don’t drive.
December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM #495637bsrsharmaParticipantThe article is very biased. Lots of people can’t afford private automobiles and live with that. Expecting society to turn a blind eye when motor vehicle laws are being violated is not asking for mercy. When a driver without insurance causes an accident, it is quite painful. It is better if those who can’t afford insurance don’t drive.
December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM #496022bsrsharmaParticipantThe article is very biased. Lots of people can’t afford private automobiles and live with that. Expecting society to turn a blind eye when motor vehicle laws are being violated is not asking for mercy. When a driver without insurance causes an accident, it is quite painful. It is better if those who can’t afford insurance don’t drive.
December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM #496109bsrsharmaParticipantThe article is very biased. Lots of people can’t afford private automobiles and live with that. Expecting society to turn a blind eye when motor vehicle laws are being violated is not asking for mercy. When a driver without insurance causes an accident, it is quite painful. It is better if those who can’t afford insurance don’t drive.
December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM #496350bsrsharmaParticipantThe article is very biased. Lots of people can’t afford private automobiles and live with that. Expecting society to turn a blind eye when motor vehicle laws are being violated is not asking for mercy. When a driver without insurance causes an accident, it is quite painful. It is better if those who can’t afford insurance don’t drive.
December 18, 2009 at 9:53 PM #495498scaredyclassicParticipantnational health and auto insurance, perhaps?
December 18, 2009 at 9:53 PM #495652scaredyclassicParticipantnational health and auto insurance, perhaps?
December 18, 2009 at 9:53 PM #496037scaredyclassicParticipantnational health and auto insurance, perhaps?
December 18, 2009 at 9:53 PM #496124scaredyclassicParticipantnational health and auto insurance, perhaps?
December 18, 2009 at 9:53 PM #496365scaredyclassicParticipantnational health and auto insurance, perhaps?
December 19, 2009 at 4:50 AM #495508ArrayaParticipantGood grief. This is not about traffic violations.
It is about:
1: What states are doing to make up shortfalls
2: Putting people in jail for debts
December 19, 2009 at 4:50 AM #495662ArrayaParticipantGood grief. This is not about traffic violations.
It is about:
1: What states are doing to make up shortfalls
2: Putting people in jail for debts
December 19, 2009 at 4:50 AM #496047ArrayaParticipantGood grief. This is not about traffic violations.
It is about:
1: What states are doing to make up shortfalls
2: Putting people in jail for debts
December 19, 2009 at 4:50 AM #496134ArrayaParticipantGood grief. This is not about traffic violations.
It is about:
1: What states are doing to make up shortfalls
2: Putting people in jail for debts
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.