Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › legal pot coming soon!
- This topic has 630 replies, 44 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by
sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2009 at 10:29 AM #356881February 27, 2009 at 10:33 AM #356304
Aecetia
ParticipantDefine old.
February 27, 2009 at 10:33 AM #356609ParticipantDefine old.
February 27, 2009 at 10:33 AM #356748ParticipantDefine old.
February 27, 2009 at 10:33 AM #356776ParticipantDefine old.
February 27, 2009 at 10:33 AM #356886ParticipantDefine old.
February 27, 2009 at 10:37 AM #356314afx114
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Why do you need to get high when you have achieved a pinnacle of success like that?[/quote]
Some would argue that you should ask a different question: Why not get high when you have achieved a pinnacle of success like that? Because he’ll win 4 or 7 golds next time instead of 8? If anything, he’s a perfect example of how smoking pot doesn’t necessarily turn you into a fat, lazy, munchie-craving retard. In many ways I think it is the Phleps incident that has re-ignited this whole debate. He has people are thinking, “well shit, that dude smokes pot and won 8 gold medals and is in peak physical condition and is on top of the world… it must not be so bad!”
February 27, 2009 at 10:37 AM #356619Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Why do you need to get high when you have achieved a pinnacle of success like that?[/quote]
Some would argue that you should ask a different question: Why not get high when you have achieved a pinnacle of success like that? Because he’ll win 4 or 7 golds next time instead of 8? If anything, he’s a perfect example of how smoking pot doesn’t necessarily turn you into a fat, lazy, munchie-craving retard. In many ways I think it is the Phleps incident that has re-ignited this whole debate. He has people are thinking, “well shit, that dude smokes pot and won 8 gold medals and is in peak physical condition and is on top of the world… it must not be so bad!”
February 27, 2009 at 10:37 AM #356758Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Why do you need to get high when you have achieved a pinnacle of success like that?[/quote]
Some would argue that you should ask a different question: Why not get high when you have achieved a pinnacle of success like that? Because he’ll win 4 or 7 golds next time instead of 8? If anything, he’s a perfect example of how smoking pot doesn’t necessarily turn you into a fat, lazy, munchie-craving retard. In many ways I think it is the Phleps incident that has re-ignited this whole debate. He has people are thinking, “well shit, that dude smokes pot and won 8 gold medals and is in peak physical condition and is on top of the world… it must not be so bad!”
February 27, 2009 at 10:37 AM #356785Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Why do you need to get high when you have achieved a pinnacle of success like that?[/quote]
Some would argue that you should ask a different question: Why not get high when you have achieved a pinnacle of success like that? Because he’ll win 4 or 7 golds next time instead of 8? If anything, he’s a perfect example of how smoking pot doesn’t necessarily turn you into a fat, lazy, munchie-craving retard. In many ways I think it is the Phleps incident that has re-ignited this whole debate. He has people are thinking, “well shit, that dude smokes pot and won 8 gold medals and is in peak physical condition and is on top of the world… it must not be so bad!”
February 27, 2009 at 10:37 AM #356896Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Why do you need to get high when you have achieved a pinnacle of success like that?[/quote]
Some would argue that you should ask a different question: Why not get high when you have achieved a pinnacle of success like that? Because he’ll win 4 or 7 golds next time instead of 8? If anything, he’s a perfect example of how smoking pot doesn’t necessarily turn you into a fat, lazy, munchie-craving retard. In many ways I think it is the Phleps incident that has re-ignited this whole debate. He has people are thinking, “well shit, that dude smokes pot and won 8 gold medals and is in peak physical condition and is on top of the world… it must not be so bad!”
February 27, 2009 at 10:56 AM #356324XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=Aecetia]Define old.[/quote]
Anyone who smoked a joint at a Grateful Dead in concert in the 60’s or 70’s.
February 27, 2009 at 10:56 AM #356629Participant[quote=Aecetia]Define old.[/quote]
Anyone who smoked a joint at a Grateful Dead in concert in the 60’s or 70’s.
February 27, 2009 at 10:56 AM #356768Participant[quote=Aecetia]Define old.[/quote]
Anyone who smoked a joint at a Grateful Dead in concert in the 60’s or 70’s.
February 27, 2009 at 10:56 AM #356795Participant[quote=Aecetia]Define old.[/quote]
Anyone who smoked a joint at a Grateful Dead in concert in the 60’s or 70’s.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.