Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law

[PCinSD]

Way to ignore most of my post. Even the appeals court would disagree with your characterization of a listing agent being allowed to withhold material facts. Existing law already takes care of that. The appeals court relied on existing case law when reaching their decision.

I agree it’s a good ruling for buyers. But again, like everyone has repeatedly pointed out, this is not a scenario that is rampant in the industry, and therefore will have little effect – no matter how much you scream it from the rooftops or bore us with it.

I don’t need to scour the internet to read random legal opinions. You do. Come talk to me after you pass law school, pass the bar exam, and actively represent buyers, sellers, agents and brokers in court in failure to disclose cases as I have.

Conning people out of $600 a pop to help them avoid foreclosure does not make you an expert. By the way, do you ever feel bad about that? You did it for several years and never once prevented a foreclosure, correct?

Why don’t you answer my question re the dual agency? Upon what do you base your assertion that the buyers were represented by the sellers agent? You’re very detail oriented, so I’m sure you can find it for us.

[SD Realtor]

I honestly keep asking myself why I am wasting my time but then I keep thinking that there may be some people on here who actually learn useful items from the site.

I recall many a post where people called out fraud on transactions only to be corrected when a little bit of actual legwork was done.

*********

Anyone who is a notch above a dimwit and has submitted an actual package for a short sale understands how accurate the estimated HUD should be. To get an accurate HUD you ask your escrow officer to call title and get a PR. The buyer has not yet spent a penny, and the contingency period has not started yet. Guess what, I JUST DID IT 10 DAYS AGO BEFORE I SUBMITTED A PACKAGE FOR A LISTING I HAVE.

Really, it is almost embarassing at this point okay?

Tell you what, go get your license, and start practicing. Then you can tell us all about the transactions you perform.

I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.

[SD Realtor]

I honestly keep asking myself why I am wasting my time but then I keep thinking that there may be some people on here who actually learn useful items from the site.

I recall many a post where people called out fraud on transactions only to be corrected when a little bit of actual legwork was done.

*********

Anyone who is a notch above a dimwit and has submitted an actual package for a short sale understands how accurate the estimated HUD should be. To get an accurate HUD you ask your escrow officer to call title and get a PR. The buyer has not yet spent a penny, and the contingency period has not started yet. Guess what, I JUST DID IT 10 DAYS AGO BEFORE I SUBMITTED A PACKAGE FOR A LISTING I HAVE.

Really, it is almost embarassing at this point okay?

Tell you what, go get your license, and start practicing. Then you can tell us all about the transactions you perform.

I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.

[SD Realtor]

I honestly keep asking myself why I am wasting my time but then I keep thinking that there may be some people on here who actually learn useful items from the site.

I recall many a post where people called out fraud on transactions only to be corrected when a little bit of actual legwork was done.

*********

Anyone who is a notch above a dimwit and has submitted an actual package for a short sale understands how accurate the estimated HUD should be. To get an accurate HUD you ask your escrow officer to call title and get a PR. The buyer has not yet spent a penny, and the contingency period has not started yet. Guess what, I JUST DID IT 10 DAYS AGO BEFORE I SUBMITTED A PACKAGE FOR A LISTING I HAVE.

Really, it is almost embarassing at this point okay?

Tell you what, go get your license, and start practicing. Then you can tell us all about the transactions you perform.

I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.

[SD Realtor]

I honestly keep asking myself why I am wasting my time but then I keep thinking that there may be some people on here who actually learn useful items from the site.

I recall many a post where people called out fraud on transactions only to be corrected when a little bit of actual legwork was done.

*********

Anyone who is a notch above a dimwit and has submitted an actual package for a short sale understands how accurate the estimated HUD should be. To get an accurate HUD you ask your escrow officer to call title and get a PR. The buyer has not yet spent a penny, and the contingency period has not started yet. Guess what, I JUST DID IT 10 DAYS AGO BEFORE I SUBMITTED A PACKAGE FOR A LISTING I HAVE.

Really, it is almost embarassing at this point okay?

Tell you what, go get your license, and start practicing. Then you can tell us all about the transactions you perform.

I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.

[SD Realtor]

I honestly keep asking myself why I am wasting my time but then I keep thinking that there may be some people on here who actually learn useful items from the site.

I recall many a post where people called out fraud on transactions only to be corrected when a little bit of actual legwork was done.

*********

Anyone who is a notch above a dimwit and has submitted an actual package for a short sale understands how accurate the estimated HUD should be. To get an accurate HUD you ask your escrow officer to call title and get a PR. The buyer has not yet spent a penny, and the contingency period has not started yet. Guess what, I JUST DID IT 10 DAYS AGO BEFORE I SUBMITTED A PACKAGE FOR A LISTING I HAVE.

Really, it is almost embarassing at this point okay?

Tell you what, go get your license, and start practicing. Then you can tell us all about the transactions you perform.

I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.

[faterikcartman]

[quote=SD Realtor]I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.[/quote]

Freud is rolling on the floor with his mother’s slip laughing his arse off at that one. 😉

[faterikcartman]

[quote=SD Realtor]I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.[/quote]

Freud is rolling on the floor with his mother’s slip laughing his arse off at that one. 😉

[faterikcartman]

[quote=SD Realtor]I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.[/quote]

Freud is rolling on the floor with his mother’s slip laughing his arse off at that one. 😉

[faterikcartman]

[quote=SD Realtor]I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.[/quote]

Freud is rolling on the floor with his mother’s slip laughing his arse off at that one. 😉

[faterikcartman]

[quote=SD Realtor]I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.[/quote]

Freud is rolling on the floor with his mother’s slip laughing his arse off at that one. 😉

[bearishgurl]

FYI, I have been “licensed” since you were probably in grade school or jr high, SDR. Again, you are stating that a buyer must enter into an escrow before they can find out how much a property (that they are already in contract for) is encumbered. That is just all the more reason for why CA needs good consumer case law on the books (like Holmes).

You seem to be taking the outcome of this case personally, SDR. How so? If you are not concerned that it will change the way you handle your transactions as a listing agent, then what’s all the fuss about?? Why attack the messenger? Why do you think the CA Assn. of Realtors (CAR) decided to file a depublication request on this case at the 11th hour? They are not a party. Why do you think they were so INTERESTED, SDR? This was clearly an attempt to negate the Holmes case from being cited as good law. What were they WORRIED about? More to the point, what are YOU worried about??

[bearishgurl]

FYI, I have been “licensed” since you were probably in grade school or jr high, SDR. Again, you are stating that a buyer must enter into an escrow before they can find out how much a property (that they are already in contract for) is encumbered. That is just all the more reason for why CA needs good consumer case law on the books (like Holmes).

You seem to be taking the outcome of this case personally, SDR. How so? If you are not concerned that it will change the way you handle your transactions as a listing agent, then what’s all the fuss about?? Why attack the messenger? Why do you think the CA Assn. of Realtors (CAR) decided to file a depublication request on this case at the 11th hour? They are not a party. Why do you think they were so INTERESTED, SDR? This was clearly an attempt to negate the Holmes case from being cited as good law. What were they WORRIED about? More to the point, what are YOU worried about??

[bearishgurl]

FYI, I have been “licensed” since you were probably in grade school or jr high, SDR. Again, you are stating that a buyer must enter into an escrow before they can find out how much a property (that they are already in contract for) is encumbered. That is just all the more reason for why CA needs good consumer case law on the books (like Holmes).

You seem to be taking the outcome of this case personally, SDR. How so? If you are not concerned that it will change the way you handle your transactions as a listing agent, then what’s all the fuss about?? Why attack the messenger? Why do you think the CA Assn. of Realtors (CAR) decided to file a depublication request on this case at the 11th hour? They are not a party. Why do you think they were so INTERESTED, SDR? This was clearly an attempt to negate the Holmes case from being cited as good law. What were they WORRIED about? More to the point, what are YOU worried about??

[bearishgurl]

FYI, I have been “licensed” since you were probably in grade school or jr high, SDR. Again, you are stating that a buyer must enter into an escrow before they can find out how much a property (that they are already in contract for) is encumbered. That is just all the more reason for why CA needs good consumer case law on the books (like Holmes).

You seem to be taking the outcome of this case personally, SDR. How so? If you are not concerned that it will change the way you handle your transactions as a listing agent, then what’s all the fuss about?? Why attack the messenger? Why do you think the CA Assn. of Realtors (CAR) decided to file a depublication request on this case at the 11th hour? They are not a party. Why do you think they were so INTERESTED, SDR? This was clearly an attempt to negate the Holmes case from being cited as good law. What were they WORRIED about? More to the point, what are YOU worried about??

[Author]

Posts