Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law
- This topic has 265 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by
bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 28, 2011 at 11:09 PM #660561January 29, 2011 at 5:56 AM #659467
SD Realtor
ParticipantMy answer is so what. The agent was lame and deserves what is coming to them. As I have said before a properly done PR will answer all those questions regarding liens and encumbrances. Agents do find this stuff out before the buyer spends a penny. Agents do ask their clients about this stuff when they take the listing. Any agent worth their salt already knows all of this information.
Don’t try to take one case and make it sound like the norm because it is not the norm. We have already been through this. You are sensationalizing and anamoly.
January 29, 2011 at 5:56 AM #659530SD Realtor
ParticipantMy answer is so what. The agent was lame and deserves what is coming to them. As I have said before a properly done PR will answer all those questions regarding liens and encumbrances. Agents do find this stuff out before the buyer spends a penny. Agents do ask their clients about this stuff when they take the listing. Any agent worth their salt already knows all of this information.
Don’t try to take one case and make it sound like the norm because it is not the norm. We have already been through this. You are sensationalizing and anamoly.
January 29, 2011 at 5:56 AM #660133SD Realtor
ParticipantMy answer is so what. The agent was lame and deserves what is coming to them. As I have said before a properly done PR will answer all those questions regarding liens and encumbrances. Agents do find this stuff out before the buyer spends a penny. Agents do ask their clients about this stuff when they take the listing. Any agent worth their salt already knows all of this information.
Don’t try to take one case and make it sound like the norm because it is not the norm. We have already been through this. You are sensationalizing and anamoly.
January 29, 2011 at 5:56 AM #660271SD Realtor
ParticipantMy answer is so what. The agent was lame and deserves what is coming to them. As I have said before a properly done PR will answer all those questions regarding liens and encumbrances. Agents do find this stuff out before the buyer spends a penny. Agents do ask their clients about this stuff when they take the listing. Any agent worth their salt already knows all of this information.
Don’t try to take one case and make it sound like the norm because it is not the norm. We have already been through this. You are sensationalizing and anamoly.
January 29, 2011 at 5:56 AM #660601SD Realtor
ParticipantMy answer is so what. The agent was lame and deserves what is coming to them. As I have said before a properly done PR will answer all those questions regarding liens and encumbrances. Agents do find this stuff out before the buyer spends a penny. Agents do ask their clients about this stuff when they take the listing. Any agent worth their salt already knows all of this information.
Don’t try to take one case and make it sound like the norm because it is not the norm. We have already been through this. You are sensationalizing and anamoly.
January 29, 2011 at 9:00 AM #659502CDMA ENG
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]My answer is so what. The agent was lame and deserves what is coming to them. As I have said before a properly done PR will answer all those questions regarding liens and encumbrances. Agents do find this stuff out before the buyer spends a penny. Agents do ask their clients about this stuff when they take the listing. Any agent worth their salt already knows all of this information.
Don’t try to take one case and make it sound like the norm because it is not the norm. We have already been through this. You are sensationalizing and anamoly.[/quote]
Ditto.
I am not a lawyer but I cannot see how this situation would not result in a lawsuit and judgement in favor of the plantiff.
CE
January 29, 2011 at 9:00 AM #659565CDMA ENG
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]My answer is so what. The agent was lame and deserves what is coming to them. As I have said before a properly done PR will answer all those questions regarding liens and encumbrances. Agents do find this stuff out before the buyer spends a penny. Agents do ask their clients about this stuff when they take the listing. Any agent worth their salt already knows all of this information.
Don’t try to take one case and make it sound like the norm because it is not the norm. We have already been through this. You are sensationalizing and anamoly.[/quote]
Ditto.
I am not a lawyer but I cannot see how this situation would not result in a lawsuit and judgement in favor of the plantiff.
CE
January 29, 2011 at 9:00 AM #660168CDMA ENG
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]My answer is so what. The agent was lame and deserves what is coming to them. As I have said before a properly done PR will answer all those questions regarding liens and encumbrances. Agents do find this stuff out before the buyer spends a penny. Agents do ask their clients about this stuff when they take the listing. Any agent worth their salt already knows all of this information.
Don’t try to take one case and make it sound like the norm because it is not the norm. We have already been through this. You are sensationalizing and anamoly.[/quote]
Ditto.
I am not a lawyer but I cannot see how this situation would not result in a lawsuit and judgement in favor of the plantiff.
CE
January 29, 2011 at 9:00 AM #660306CDMA ENG
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]My answer is so what. The agent was lame and deserves what is coming to them. As I have said before a properly done PR will answer all those questions regarding liens and encumbrances. Agents do find this stuff out before the buyer spends a penny. Agents do ask their clients about this stuff when they take the listing. Any agent worth their salt already knows all of this information.
Don’t try to take one case and make it sound like the norm because it is not the norm. We have already been through this. You are sensationalizing and anamoly.[/quote]
Ditto.
I am not a lawyer but I cannot see how this situation would not result in a lawsuit and judgement in favor of the plantiff.
CE
January 29, 2011 at 9:00 AM #660636CDMA ENG
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]My answer is so what. The agent was lame and deserves what is coming to them. As I have said before a properly done PR will answer all those questions regarding liens and encumbrances. Agents do find this stuff out before the buyer spends a penny. Agents do ask their clients about this stuff when they take the listing. Any agent worth their salt already knows all of this information.
Don’t try to take one case and make it sound like the norm because it is not the norm. We have already been through this. You are sensationalizing and anamoly.[/quote]
Ditto.
I am not a lawyer but I cannot see how this situation would not result in a lawsuit and judgement in favor of the plantiff.
CE
January 29, 2011 at 9:20 AM #659507SD Realtor
ParticipantI think that if anything is learned from this lawsuit it is that buyers should beware when they choose to work directly through a listing agent. I think that for buyers who are savvy and know what is going on then there may be some benefit as they can potentially try to gain position in a competitive bidding process. However if you are assuming your representation is going to be top notch then that is an incorrect assumption.
January 29, 2011 at 9:20 AM #659570SD Realtor
ParticipantI think that if anything is learned from this lawsuit it is that buyers should beware when they choose to work directly through a listing agent. I think that for buyers who are savvy and know what is going on then there may be some benefit as they can potentially try to gain position in a competitive bidding process. However if you are assuming your representation is going to be top notch then that is an incorrect assumption.
January 29, 2011 at 9:20 AM #660173SD Realtor
ParticipantI think that if anything is learned from this lawsuit it is that buyers should beware when they choose to work directly through a listing agent. I think that for buyers who are savvy and know what is going on then there may be some benefit as they can potentially try to gain position in a competitive bidding process. However if you are assuming your representation is going to be top notch then that is an incorrect assumption.
January 29, 2011 at 9:20 AM #660311SD Realtor
ParticipantI think that if anything is learned from this lawsuit it is that buyers should beware when they choose to work directly through a listing agent. I think that for buyers who are savvy and know what is going on then there may be some benefit as they can potentially try to gain position in a competitive bidding process. However if you are assuming your representation is going to be top notch then that is an incorrect assumption.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.
